Transdiagnostic Treatment for Anxiety Disorders in Two Cities of México
Effectiveness of the Transdiagnostic Treatment in the Population of Tijuana and Juarez With Anxiety and Electrophysiological Correlation Measurements. A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of The Unified Transdiagnostic Protocol, a psychological treatment for the intervention of a broad range of anxiety disorders. It is compared the effectiveness of the treatment with the changes of the same participants before and after the treatment and a control group. The changes are being assessed through subjective measures such as psychometrics and objective measures such as Electroencelophalography.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 6, 2020
CompletedJuly 7, 2020
July 1, 2020
11 months
April 8, 2019
July 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Decrease in the scores of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale
The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale is a 17-item structured interview. The severity over the last 2 weeks of each item on the PSS is rated by the interviewer using a 4-point scale: 0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, and 3 = very much. The maximum possible score is 51 (severely affected) and the minimum possible score is 0 (total absence of the symptoms). The total severity score is calculated as the sum of the severity ratings for the 17 items. The diagnosis of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale is made when at least 1 re-experiencing, 3 avoidance and 2 arousal symptoms are endorsed on the scale by individuals who were traumatized at least one month prior to the assessment. It is expected a statistical significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in the patients suffering from this disorder.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Decrease in the score of Anxiety symptoms
The State Trait Anxiety Inventory consists of two subscales of 20 items each that measure anxiety as a transient state of tension (Scale A-State), and as a characteristic of the personality relatively stable over time (Scale B -trait). The items are composed by an assertion to which the subject responds indicating their degree of identification. In the case of state anxiety, the scale goes from 1 (not at all), 2 (somewhat), 3 (moderately), 4 (very much), while in the trait anxiety it ranges from 1 (almost never), 2 (sometimes), 3 (often), 4 (almost always). In both, a percentage of the items evaluates well-being or absence of anxiety, while the rest of the items to the presence of anxiety. Scores range from 20 to 80, in each subscale, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety. It is expected a statistical significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the anxiety symptoms.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Decrease in the symptoms of depression
The Beck Depression Inventory is a self-report that provides a measure of the presence and severity of depression. Contains 21 items indicative of symptoms such as sadness, crying, loss of pleasure, feelings of failure and guilt, suicidal thoughts or desires, pessimism, etc. Each item is answered on a 4-point scale, from 0 to 3, where each number is identified different for each item, in all of them 0 means absence and 3 full presence (e.g. sadness), except for items 16 (changes in the sleep pattern) and 18 (changes in appetite) that contain 7 categories. The minimum and maximum scores in the test are 0 and 63. Cut-off points ha that allow to classify those evaluated in one of the following four groups: 0-13, minimum depression; 14-19, mild depression; 20-28, moderate depression; and 29-63, severe depression. It is expected a statistical significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the depression symptoms.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Decrease in the symptoms of General Anxiety Disorder
On the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale subjects are asked how often, during the last 2 weeks, they have been bothered by each of the 7 core symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder. Response options are "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day," scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Therefore, GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 21, with scores of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 representing mild, moderate, and severe anxiety symptom levels, respectively. It is expected a statistical significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the General Anxiety symptoms.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Decrease in gamma rhythm measures
Decrease in the gamma rhythm trough the EEG measure. The decrease will be shown comparing the participants in the intervention group within their own results in the pre to post measures, and comparing the participants in the control group vs. the intervention group.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Decrease is Obsessive Compulsive symptoms
The Yale-BrownObsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is composed of 10 items: 5 related to obsessions and the other 5, to compulsions, having an answer option from 0 to 4 (from not presenting a symptom until presenting extreme symptoms). The diagnostic classification is based on the points of cut where 0 to 7 represents "without clinical manifestations", 8 to 15, "mild", 16 to 23, "moderate", 24 to 31 as "severe" and 32 to 40 as "extreme". It is expected a statistical significant decrease (P \< 0.05) in the Obsesive Compulsive symptoms.
3 to 4.5 months, depending on the development of the patient and the sessions needed, 11 to 17.
Study Arms (2)
Transdiagnostic Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive from 11 to 17 sessions of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants in this group will not receive the treatment, just waiting list. They will be measured one time and then a second time 3 months after. Calculating when 3 months corresponding to 11-12 sessions will take place in the intervention group.
Interventions
The Unified Transdiagnostic Protocol (PUT) is a cognitive-behavioral treatment focused on emotions. "The PUT was developed to be applicable to anxiety disorders, mood disorders, as well as other disorders in which anxiety and emotional dysregulation play an important role, such as many somatoform and dissociative disorders". The PUT proposal includes 8 modules, of which 5 are nuclear, it is recommended to give these modules between 11 to 17 sessions with a duration of one hour each.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptoms of General Anxiety Disorder and/or Panic Disorder and/or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and/or Social Anxiety Disorder and / or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
You may not qualify if:
- Consuming drugs
- To receive another psychological treatment in the same period of the study
- To be consuming medicines to treat symptoms of anxiety or depression
- To show comorbidity with a psychiatric disorder
- Moderate to high score in the suicide scale
- Recent attempt of suicide (3 months) measured with the Scale of Beck's Suicidal Ideation (Beck, Steer and Ranieri, 1988).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez
Juárez, Chihuahua, 32300, Mexico
Autonomous University of Baja California
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22427, Mexico
Related Publications (14)
Beck AT, Steer, RA, Brown, GK. Manual for Beck Depression Inventory-II. (1996) San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA, Ranieri WF. Scale for Suicide Ideation: psychometric properties of a self-report version. J Clin Psychol. 1988 Jul;44(4):499-505. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198807)44:43.0.co;2-6.
PMID: 3170753BACKGROUNDBrown TA, Di Nardo PA, Lehman CL, Campbell LA. Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for the classification of emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):49-58. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.49.
PMID: 11261399BACKGROUNDEllard KK, Fairholme CP, Boisseau CL, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Protocol Development and Initial Outcome Data. Cogn Behav Pract. 2010 Feb;17(1):88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.06.002. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
PMID: 33762811BACKGROUNDFoa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, Perry K. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The posttraumatic diagnostic scale. Psychol Assess 1997;9(4):445-451.
BACKGROUNDGoodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, Heninger GR, Charney DS. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1006-11. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007.
PMID: 2684084BACKGROUNDJohn OP, Naumann LP, Soto CJ. Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). 2008 New York, NY: Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDKennedy KA, Barlow DH. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: An introduction. In Farchione TJ, Barlow, DH (Eds.), Applications of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press. 2017
BACKGROUNDOathes DJ, Ray WJ, Yamasaki AS, Borkovec TD, Castonguay LG, Newman MG, Nitschke J. Worry, generalized anxiety disorder, and emotion: evidence from the EEG gamma band. Biol Psychol. 2008 Oct;79(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
PMID: 18499328BACKGROUNDSpielberger C, Diaz-Guerrero R. IDARE: Inventario de Ansiedad Rasgo-Estado. México: Manual Moderno. 1975
BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDYacila GA, Cook-del Aguila L, Sanchez-Castro AE, Reyes-Bossio M, Tejada RA. Traducción y adaptación cultural del Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) para trastornos obsesivos compulsivos Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of Yale- Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Acta Médica Peruana. 2016. 33 (3):253-255.
BACKGROUNDLowe B, Decker O, Muller S, Brahler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.
PMID: 18388841BACKGROUNDHishinuma ES, Miyamoto RH, Nishimura ST, Nahulu LB, Andrade NN, Makini GK Jr, Yuen NY, Johnson RC, Kim SP, Goebert DA, Guerrero AP. Psychometric properties of the state-trait anxiety inventory for Asian/Pacific-islander adolescents. Assessment. 2000 Mar;7(1):17-36. doi: 10.1177/107319110000700102.
PMID: 10668003BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, PhD
Autonomous University of Baja California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The patients are not aware that there is an intervention group and a control group, the participants are not related and do not know each other. The conditions of the study are only known by the researcher, the therapists and the bioethics committee of the Autonomous University of Baja California. The participants are assigned randomly to the intervention or control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full time professor of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
February 4, 2019
Primary Completion
January 6, 2020
Study Completion
January 6, 2020
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- This data will be available approximately in January 2020 and it will be permanently available. It wil be shared in the databases of the journal where the article(s) will be published
- Access Criteria
- Through the servers of the journal(s) where we will publish the articles.
The information will be available in a private server or in a server of the journal(s) that we will publish the articles that will be the result of this study. The protocol of the study is currently in progress to be published, in this article will be included such study protocol, statistical analysis plan and the informed consent is already shared in the register of clinical trials.