Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Severe Ptosis Correction
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Main research purposes of this research is to compare the therapeutic effect and safety of the superior levator muscle shortening combined with the tarsus resection and the traditional frontal muscle flap in the correction of severe ptosis. Aside of above we also tend to explore the dose-effect relationship between the amount of levator muscle shortened/ tarsus resection and postoperative ptosis correction amount.So as to develop a more critical and specific guidelines for clinical treatment of ptosis. So during the research we will recruiting patients with severe ptosis and randomly divide them into levator muscle and tarsus group and frontal muscle flap group, and follow up those patient 6 months post operation so as to evaluate the amount of correction and the side-symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedApril 16, 2019
April 1, 2019
2 years
April 8, 2019
April 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
levator muscle's strength
Measuring the muscle strength: let the patient look straight ahead, the examiner presses the eyebrow arch horizontally with the thumb, interrupting the connection between the frontal muscle and the upper eyelids, and ask patient to look down. Then ask the patient to look up as much as they can, and the scale of this movement is the levator muscle strength. When a normal person does not use the frontal muscle, the average scale of the upper eye lids movement is 13.37±2.55mm. The muscle strength of the upper eye lids is generally divided into three levels. The good upper eye lids movement scale is 8mm, the medium is 4\~7mm, and the weak one is 0\~3mm.
6 months post the treatment
width of eyes
Measure the width of eyes while doctor shall make sure patient avoid looking up or using the frontal muscle to lift eyelids.
6 months post the treatment
MRD (margin reflex distance)
Measure the distance from the upper temporal margin to the point of reflection at the center of the cornea, while doctor shall make sure patient avoid looking up or using the frontal muscle to lift eyelids.
6 months post the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Numbers of patients not completely corrected
6 months post the treatment
Numbers of patients having dry eye syndrome
6 months post the treatment
Numbers of patients having corneal injury
6 months post the treatment
Numbers of patients having orbital insufficiency
6 months post the treatment
Numbers of patients having conjunctival prolapse;
6 months post the treatment
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Levator muscle and tarsus resection
EXPERIMENTALFrontal muscle flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Shortening the levator muscle with resection of tarsus to correct severe ptosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- unilateral ptosis patient
- the levator muscle strength less than 4mm
- primary surgery
- older than 3 years
- ocular rectus muscle of good strength;
You may not qualify if:
- patients who had undergone ptosis correction surgery
- patients with neurological ptosis, senile ptosis or pseudo ptosis
- patients with abnormal ocular function
- patients with Marcus-Gunn syndromes
- patients with severe systemic disease or intolerant to general anesthesia
- patients or their parents cannot finish follow-up due to educational level or various other reasons.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Affliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jun Yang, MD, Phd
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Affliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People'sHospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
April 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share