TOF-18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Suspected Pancreatic Cancer
TOF-P
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of TOF-18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Suspected Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
174
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim of the prospective study is a better differentiation of benign and malignant lesions in the pancreas in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer using images 30 and 90 min p.i. (post injectionen) and a diagnostic CT (computed tomography) scan of the abdomen within the Time of Flight (TOF)-18F-FDG-PET/CT and thus an improvement of the quality of PET/CT findings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Started Feb 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 13, 2020
CompletedMay 29, 2020
May 1, 2020
4.9 years
April 2, 2019
March 30, 2020
May 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
SUVmax (Maximal Standard Uptake Value) Measurement 30 and 90 Min p.i. (Post Injection)
Quantitative measurement of regional tracer uptake by SUVmax in the TOF-PET/CT and standard PET/CT images over the FDG-accumulating lesions in the pancreas 30 and 90min p.i. The histopathological findings (malignant or benign) were assigned to the corresponding SUVmax values of the pancreatic lesions for the calculation of AUC values in ROC analysis. Then AUC values with and without TOF were compared with the DeLong-test to analyze if there is a significant difference in characterization of pancreatic lesions with TOF.
2 hours
Participants With Increased Tracer Uptake Over the Pancreatic Lesion With and Without TOF
The number of participants with increased tracer uptake over the pancreatic lesion, i.e. the number of pancreatic lesions with increased tracer uptake with and without TOF. One pancreatic lesion per patient was measured.
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Lesion Size
2 hours
Study Arms (1)
PET/CT results with TOF/without TOF
OTHER* Diagnostic CT of the abdomen or upper abdomen (in case of already performed diagnostic CT of the abdomen \< 2 weeks ago) with 2 phases, 1 - 4 mSv, ca. 20 sec., 1 x * Contrast medium (Iodixanol 550 mg/ml) 1 x 1.4 ml/kg body weight i.v. for 40 sec, 1 x if creatinine, GFR, and TSH levels are within the normal range * 1 x 500 ml water oral, 1 x * Biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration) or operation of the pancreas
Interventions
Diagnostic CT of the abdomen or upper abdomen with parenteral contrast medium (Visipaque=Iodixanol) if creatinine, GFR, and TSH levels are within the normal range and oral (water) contrast medium within TOF-18F-FDG PET/CT. In the case of elevated creatine or decreased GFR or TSH levels a diagnostic CT of the abdomen or upper abdomen without contrast medium is performed. Biopsy or FNA or operation of the pancreas.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with suspected pancreatic cancer
You may not qualify if:
- persons under 18 years of age
- patients with blood glucose level ≥160 mg/dl at the time of the PET/CT examination
- patients who will not be operated or biopsied and in which thus there are no histopathological findings of the pancreas
- pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Santhosh S, Mittal BR, Bhasin D, Srinivasan R, Rana S, Das A, Nada R, Bhattacharya A, Gupta R, Kapoor R. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the characterization of pancreatic masses: experience from tropics. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Feb;28(2):255-61. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12068.
PMID: 23278193BACKGROUNDNagamachi S, Nishii R, Wakamatsu H, Mizutani Y, Kiyohara S, Fujita S, Futami S, Sakae T, Furukoji E, Tamura S, Arita H, Chijiiwa K, Kawai K. The usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI fusion image in diagnosing pancreatic tumor: comparison with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;27(6):554-63. doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0719-3. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
PMID: 23580090BACKGROUNDStacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almen T, Aspelin P, Bellin MF, Clement O, Heinz-Peer G; Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2527-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2225-0. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
PMID: 21866433RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The actual discontinuation rate was higher than expected/anticipated. Therefore, the analysis of the primary outcome measure, a difference between AUC values with and without TOF in ROC-analysis, was underpowered.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Susanne Stanzel
- Organization
- Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susanne Stanzel, MD
Medical University of Graz, Austria
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- All parties involved in the clinical trial have knowledge of the interventions assigned to the individual participants.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
February 7, 2014
Primary Completion
January 17, 2019
Study Completion
March 5, 2019
Last Updated
May 29, 2020
Results First Posted
May 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available apart from the principle investigator only to the statistician who carries out the statistical evaluation of the study.