NCT03912584

Brief Summary

The study evaluates the image quality between two OCT devices.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2019

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 29, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 23, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 23, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 day

First QC Date

April 9, 2019

Results QC Date

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Qualitative B-Scan Assessment

    Scores will be based on a 4 point grading scale (0 to 3), with 0 corresponding to failure, 1 is poor, 2 is fair, and 3 is good. The four point scale is defined as follows: 0 indicates the scan is a failure, and contains no clinically useful information. No relevant structures are visible in the scan. 1. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is poor, and it contains very limited clinical utility. 2. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is fair or average. It contains some useful clinical information and therefore provides adequate clinical utility. 3. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is good. It contains useful clinical information. The clinical utility is high or good.

    1 day (start: April 29, 2019 - completed: April 30, 2019)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    1 day

Study Arms (1)

Optical Coherence Tomographer

OTHER
Device: P200TEDevice: P200TxE

Interventions

P200TEDEVICE

The P200TE Ophthalmoscope provides widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) fundus imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging in one device.

Optical Coherence Tomographer
P200TxEDEVICE

The P200TxE Ophthalmoscope provides widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) fundus imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging in one device.

Optical Coherence Tomographer

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects 22 years of age or older who have full legal capacity to volunteer on the date the informed consent is signed;
  • Subjects who can follow the instructions by the clinical staff at the clinical site,
  • Subjects who agree to participate in the study;
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with glaucoma in the study eye as confirmed by the investigator;

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging;
  • Subjects with ocular media not sufficiently clear to obtain acceptable OCT images;
  • Subjects with any clinically significant ocular pathology except glaucoma, as determined by self-report and/or investigator assessment on the day of the study visit;
  • Subjects who are not reliably tested with at least one Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field (24-2 or 30-2, white on white) measured on the day of the study visit or within the previous year from the study visit, defined as fixation losses \> 20% or false positives \> 33%, or false negatives \> 33%;
  • Subjects with history of dementia or multiple sclerosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates

San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michael Sinai, PhD
Organization
Optos

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2019

First Posted

April 11, 2019

Study Start

April 29, 2019

Primary Completion

April 30, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

September 23, 2022

Results First Posted

September 23, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Locations