Study Comparing the P200TE and the P200TxE in Glaucoma Patients
Qualitative OCT Image Grading Study Comparing the P200TE and the P200TxE in Glaucoma Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study evaluates the image quality between two OCT devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 23, 2022
CompletedSeptember 23, 2022
September 1, 2022
1 day
April 9, 2019
June 21, 2021
September 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Qualitative B-Scan Assessment
Scores will be based on a 4 point grading scale (0 to 3), with 0 corresponding to failure, 1 is poor, 2 is fair, and 3 is good. The four point scale is defined as follows: 0 indicates the scan is a failure, and contains no clinically useful information. No relevant structures are visible in the scan. 1. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is poor, and it contains very limited clinical utility. 2. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is fair or average. It contains some useful clinical information and therefore provides adequate clinical utility. 3. indicates the condition of the structure or feature being assessed is good. It contains useful clinical information. The clinical utility is high or good.
1 day (start: April 29, 2019 - completed: April 30, 2019)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
1 day
Study Arms (1)
Optical Coherence Tomographer
OTHERInterventions
The P200TE Ophthalmoscope provides widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) fundus imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging in one device.
The P200TxE Ophthalmoscope provides widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) fundus imaging and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging in one device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects 22 years of age or older who have full legal capacity to volunteer on the date the informed consent is signed;
- Subjects who can follow the instructions by the clinical staff at the clinical site,
- Subjects who agree to participate in the study;
- Subjects who have been diagnosed with glaucoma in the study eye as confirmed by the investigator;
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging;
- Subjects with ocular media not sufficiently clear to obtain acceptable OCT images;
- Subjects with any clinically significant ocular pathology except glaucoma, as determined by self-report and/or investigator assessment on the day of the study visit;
- Subjects who are not reliably tested with at least one Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field (24-2 or 30-2, white on white) measured on the day of the study visit or within the previous year from the study visit, defined as fixation losses \> 20% or false positives \> 33%, or false negatives \> 33%;
- Subjects with history of dementia or multiple sclerosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Optos, PLClead
Study Sites (1)
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Sinai, PhD
- Organization
- Optos
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2019
First Posted
April 11, 2019
Study Start
April 29, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2019
Study Completion
April 30, 2019
Last Updated
September 23, 2022
Results First Posted
September 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09