NCT03910140

Brief Summary

To validate the tumor response rate: in the previous study, the investigators showed that TILA-TACE achieved 100% tumor response rate. However, as the study sample size was 40, the investigators need to validate the tumor response rate using a larger sample size; To validate the overall survival: in the previous study, the investigators showed that TILA-TACE significantly prolonged the overall survival of the patients with large and massive tumor. Again, the sample size was small, the investigators need to validate the data using a large sample size.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
2,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2019

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6.2 years

First QC Date

February 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The response to treatment

    Viable tumors were assessed by MRI according to EASL criteria. The enhanced and non-enhanced areas represent viable and necrotic tumors. At least 2 radiologists evaluate the approximate viable tumor residues (%) of total tumor volume (Total tumor volume was the sum of viable and necrotic volume). The response to treatment is defined by the Viable Tumor Residues (%) as below: complete response (CR), no obvious viable residuals; near complete response (NCR), viable residuals \<10%; partial response (PR), viable residuals \>10% but \< 50%; stable disease (SD), viable tumor residuals between \>50% but ≤100%; and progressive disease (PD), viable tumors \> 100%.

    1 month after therapy

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Lifetime (months)

    6 months once after therapy

Study Arms (1)

TILA-TACE group

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: TILA-TACE treatment

Interventions

TACE was performed through the transfemoral route using a 5-Fr catheter (Shepherd-hook modified Angiographic Catheter, HANACO Medical, Tian Jin, China ) that was advanced from celiac artery to common hepatic artery, proper hepatic artery, hepatic artery and ultimately to tumor feeding arteries which are defined by angiography. Then, a coaxial microcatheter (2.8 Fr Marguerite II, ASAHI INTECC GMA CO., LTD, Nagoya, Japan) was selectively inserted through a 5-Fr catheter into the tumor feeding artery, into which, 5% sodium bicarbonate was infused alternatively with doxorubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Finally, the artery was embolized with PVA (Embosphere®, BioSphere Medical, Paris, France) and microcoil ( Tornado ®, COOK Medical, USA).

Also known as: 3D-CRT, SBRT, SIRT
TILA-TACE group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma is confirmed by tissue pathology or in accordance with clinical diagnosis standard;
  • ECOG score 0-1;
  • HCC BCLC grading 0, A, B, C;
  • Child-Pugh score prior to therapy A and B;
  • As judged by investigators, the patient can comply with the study protocol;
  • Patient voluntarily participates in this study, understands the process of the study, and is willing to sign the written consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • HCC BCLC grading D;
  • Child-Pugh score prior to therapy C.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Second affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Radiotherapy, ConformalSirtuins

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapyTherapeuticsGroup III Histone DeacetylasesHistone DeacetylasesAmidohydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesADP Ribose TransferasesPentosyltransferasesGlycosyltransferasesTransferasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2019

First Posted

April 10, 2019

Study Start

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations