Comparison of Patient-reported Pain After Initial Archwire Placement
Archwires
Archwires
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Study Start
May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 1, 2028
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Three different types of 'archwires' can be used in Orthodontic treatment, wire choice is decided by treating Orthodontist based on professional preference since research shows that all types are equally effective. It is possible that one type of wire engenders more patient discomfort. This study will compare the discomfort levels engendered by the three wire types to determine if there is one that induces the least amount.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 1, 2028
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 19, 2019
Actual (reported)April 8, 2019
Actual (reported)May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)June 1, 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
June 1, 2028
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Pain score via Visual Analogue Score
The primary outcome is the change in pain experienced by the study participant over the first week of therapy after insertion of the archwire. Pain is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of pain being experienced. The left end of the line is no pain where the right end is maximum (unimaginable) pain. The specific pain indicated is in the number of millimeters from the left end of the line. This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number the more intense the pain. The difference in VAS pain scores from the initial VAS after archwire insertion (1 hour) to each measurement time (4 hour, 24 hour, 4 day and 7 day) over 7 days will indicate the change pain experience for each study participant. For each time point the mean and standard deviation of the change in VAS pain scores for the experimental groups will be calculated and compared for statistically significant differences.
1 hour, 4 hour, 24 hour, 4 day and 7 day
0.016" Nitinol (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) archwire to be tied to the fixed orthodontic brackets at the initial bonding appointment.
0.016" Ormco 27oC NiTi (Ormco, Glendora, CA) archwire to be tied to the fixed orthodontic brackets at the initial bonding appointment.
0.016" Ormco 35oC NiTi (Ormco, Glendora, CA) archwire to be tied to the fixed orthodontic brackets at the initial bonding appointment.
Placement of 3M Unitek 0.016 archwire for orthodontic treatment
Placement of 0.016" Ormco 27oC NiTi orthodontic archwire
University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Cioffi I, Piccolo A, Tagliaferri R, Paduano S, Galeotti A, Martina R. Pain perception following first orthodontic archwire placement--thermoelastic vs superelastic alloys: a randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int. 2012 Jan;43(1):61-9.
Graf M, Alhammouri Q, Vieregge C, Lorenz B. The Bruckner transillumination test: limited detection of small-angle esotropia. Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):2504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.016.
First Submitted
March 19, 2019
First Posted
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neuromodulation in the Control of Chronic Orofacial Pain
Placement of 0.016" Ormco 35oC NiTi orthodontic archwire
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: from causes to management--a review. Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):170-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl081.
Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
April 8, 2019
Study Start
May 10, 2019
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 1, 2028
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
May 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
The COMIRB approval and the consent forms specify that we cannot share PHI except as mandated by law. Therefore we do not intend to share any IPD to other researchers.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: