Evaluation of Potential Development of Photoallergic Skin Reaction After Use of MC2-01 Cream
A 6-Week, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Potential of MC2-01 Cream to Induce Photoallergic Skin Reaction in Healthy Subjects, Using a Controlled Photopatch Test Design
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial is a 6-week, Randomized study evaluating the potential of MC2-01 Cream to induce a photoallergic skin reaction in Healthy subjects, using a controlled photopatch test design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 5, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2020
CompletedMarch 11, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 months
March 20, 2019
February 24, 2020
February 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated. MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another naive test site was untreated. 24 hours after product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle) + the untreated site were irradiated. Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 5 test sites 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study. The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.
24 hours
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated. MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another two naive test sites were untreated. 24 hours of product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and untreated) were irradiated. Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 6 test sites, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study. The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.
48 hours
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated. MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another two naive test sites were untreated. 24 hours of product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and untreated) were irradiated. Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 6 test sites, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study. The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.
72 hours
Study Arms (9)
Induction:MC2-01 Cream, irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplications with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation
Induction: MC2-01 Cream, no irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplications with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation
Induction: MC2-01 vehicle, irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplications with MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation
Induction: MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplications with MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Challenge: MC2-01 Cream, irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplication with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation
Challenge: MC2-01 Cream, No irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplication with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation
Challenge: MC2-01 vehicle, irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplication with MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation
Challenge: MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
EXPERIMENTALApplication with MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Challenge: Control, irradiation
EXPERIMENTALNo application, but irradiation
Interventions
Repeated applications of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 Cream, CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 cream, followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Single application of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Single application of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Single application of MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Single application of MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
No application, but irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is a healthy male or female
- Is 18 years of age or older
- Agree not to participate in any clinical or patch test studies at Day 1 through study completion
- Females or childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of contraception for one month prior to Screening and until the end of study visit has been performed
- In the case of a female of childbearing potential, has a negative urine pregnancy test on Day 1 prior to randomization and are willing to submit to a urine pregnancy test at the end of study
- In the case of a female of childbearing potential, has had a hysterectomy or is postmenopausal
- Is free of any systemic or dermatological disorder, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study results or increase the risk of AEs.
- Has uniformly-colored skin on the intrascapular region of the back which will allow discernment of erythema, and has Fitzpatrick skin types I, II or III
- Complete a medical screening procedure
- Read, understand and sign an informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Has a history of photosensitivity or photoallergy
- Has any visible skin disease at the application site which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the evaluation of the test site reaction
- Current or past history of hypercalcemia, vitamin D toxicity, severe renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disorders
- Is using systemic/topical corticosteroids within 3 weeks prior to and/or during the study or systemic/topical antihistamines 72 hours prior to and during the study
- Is not willing to refrain from using systemic/topical anti-inflammatory analgesics (81 mg aspirin and occasional use of acetaminophen will be permitted)
- Are taking medication known to cause phototoxic reaction
- Is using medication which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study results
- Is unwilling or unable to refrain from the use of sunscreens, cosmetics, creams, ointments, lotions or similar products on the back during the study
- Has psoriasis and/or atopic dermatitis/eczema
- Has a known sensitivity or allergy to constituents of the materials being evaluated
- Is a female who is pregnant, plans to become pregnant during the study, or is breast feeding a child
- Has damaged skin in or around the test sites, including sunburn, excessively deep tans, uneven skin tones, tattoos, scars excessive hair, numerous freckles or other disfigurations of the test site
- Has received treatment for any type of internal cancer within 5 years prior to study entry
- Has a history of, or are currently being treated for skin cancer and/or hepatitis
- Has a history or, or is currently being treated for diabetes
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MC2 Therapeuticslead
Study Sites (1)
TKL Research Inc.
Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 07410, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Birgitte Vestbjerg
- Organization
- MC2 Therapeutics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan S Dosik, MD
TKL Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The tests sites (M2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle, control) will not be blinded to the site staff involved in the preparation/application and removal of treatments. The subjects and the trained assessor will be blinded to the IPs and treatment allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2019
First Posted
April 2, 2019
Study Start
February 13, 2019
Primary Completion
April 5, 2019
Study Completion
April 5, 2019
Last Updated
March 11, 2020
Results First Posted
March 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Single site study