Attention Control Training (ACT) and Very Preterm Infants
ACT
A Feasibility Study of the Attention Control Training (ACT) Intervention Among Very Preterm (VP) Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Infants' attention control, defined as the ability to select what to pay attention to, is a fundamental building block for developing learning abilities and behaviour self-regulation. Infants born before term (\<37 weeks gestation) display delays in attention control, and these delays cause cascade effects that include learning difficulties and behaviour problems. Infants born before 32 weeks of gestation, known as very preterm (VP), are particularly at risk of persistent difficulties in attention. A ground-breaking early intervention, the Attention Control Training (ACT), targets infants' attention control. The novelty of the ACT lies in engaging young infants in "brain-training" using a computer interface, which tracks infants' gaze direction and presents training visual stimuli appropriate to the infants' ability level. Results demonstrate ACT improves attention of typically developing infants, contributing to improvements in other cognitive abilities (e.g. memory), but ACT has not been tested in clinical populations such as VP infants. The investigators are running a feasibility study of the ACT intervention amongst VP infants aged 1 year (corrected age for prematurity). This feasibility study is necessary in order to adapt the ACT material and presentation to VP infants, and in particular to investigate the acceptability of a Randomised Trial and its training schedule by parents of VP infants. The proposed study will allow the investigators to identify solutions to problems, ensuring the ACT material and delivery are customised for VP infants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 11, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 25, 2023
CompletedJuly 25, 2023
September 1, 2022
1.3 years
March 27, 2019
December 3, 2021
September 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recruitment and Retention
Recruitment as a percentage of the eligible families approached who agreed to take part in the study and were randomised, and retention, defined as the percentage of randomised participants for whom data are available at baseline and post-test.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Training/Control Sessions Attended by Infants
1 year
Percentage of Training/Control Sessions Completed by Infants
1 year
Duration of Tasks Administered to Infants During Training/Control Sessions
1 year
Percentage of Tasks Completed at Post-test
1 year
Quality of Eye-tracker Data Collected During Baseline and Post-test Attention Assessments
1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ACT
EXPERIMENTALControl
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Infants watch interactive cartoons that respond to infants' direction of gaze. An eye-tracker records the infant's eye movements in real time, relaying this information to the computer. These presentations trigger motivating stimuli (cartoon animations with child-friendly sounds) every time the infant fulfills the demands of a task (e.g. when the infant looks at a character on the screen avoiding to be distracted by other objects moving across the screen). The length of training sessions varies depending on infants' engagement with stimuli and time criteria.
The control procedure involves presentation of cartoons on a screen, while infants' gaze direction is recorded using the same eye-tracker and camera. The crucial difference is that the cartoons in this case are not interactive, thus do not change depending on infants' gaze direction. To ensure presentations in the control procedure are similar in length to those of the intervention group, infants in the control group are matched infant-by-infant and visit-by-visit with participants in the ACT treatment group: Infants in the control group see a replay of the session of the matched treated infant. Therefore, while the presentation is exactly the same (i.e. same length and same stimuli) for the treated and the control child, in the latter case the presentation is not interactive (i.e. not generated contingently on the infants' visual behaviour).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants born very preterm (gestational age 28 to less than 32 weeks);
- Infant's family residing in Northern Ireland;
- Infant's age 12 months (+/- 1 month) at the start of the study, corrected for prematurity
You may not qualify if:
- Significant visual and/or hearing disabilities;
- Congenital anomalies that may impact on their cognitive and sensory-motor development;
- A diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy;
- Infant taking part in a trial (or have recently taken part in a trial) which may interfere with this study (e.g. by affecting concentration abilities or representing a significant burden for the family).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Queen's University, Belfastlead
- Public Health Agency, Health and Social Care Research and Developmentcollaborator
- TinyLifecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Queen's University Belfast
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Perra O, Wass S, McNulty A, Sweet D, Papageorgiou K, Johnston M, Patterson A, Bilello D, Alderdice F. Training attention control of very preterm infants: protocol for a feasibility study of the Attention Control Training (ACT). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 10;6:17. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-0556-9. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32055404BACKGROUNDPerra O, Alderdice F, Sweet D, McNulty A, Johnston M, Bilello D, Papageorgiou K, Wass S. Attention and social communication skills of very preterm infants after training attention control: Bayesian analyses of a feasibility study. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0273767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273767. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36137090DERIVEDPerra O, Wass S, McNulty A, Sweet D, Papageorgiou KA, Johnston M, Bilello D, Patterson A, Alderdice F. Very preterm infants engage in an intervention to train their control of attention: results from the feasibility study of the Attention Control Training (ACT) randomised trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 12;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00809-z.
PMID: 33712090DERIVED
Related Links
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Oliver Perra
- Organization
- Queen's University Belfast
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2019
First Posted
April 1, 2019
Study Start
March 11, 2018
Primary Completion
June 28, 2019
Study Completion
March 11, 2020
Last Updated
July 25, 2023
Results First Posted
July 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share