NCT03896191

Brief Summary

It is unclear why 20% of patients with total knee replacements (TKR) are dissatisfied. Few studies have specifically assessed the way people walk ('gait') with an 'unhappy' or unstable knee or following re-do ('revision') TKR surgery. The investigators conjecture that people having re-do TKR surgery because their knee is unstable will have altered walking patterns (for example, less bending of the knee) before and after surgery, and that these changes are related to how satisfied the patient is with their knee. The investigators will also examine whether there are differences in the way people walk with an unstable knee replacement or with a stable knee replacement, in comparison to people who do not have a knee replacement. This exploratory project will use 3D infrared cameras to analyse differences in walking patterns and whether there is associated change in patient satisfaction. If an association exists, the data from this study may help to develop alternative measures of outcomes, in order to guide treatment decisions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2019

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 21, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Total knee replacementRevision knee surgeryKnee instabilityGait analysisPatient reported outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from preoperative maximum knee flexion during swing.

    Maximum knee flexion angle during the swing phase of gait.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • Change from preoperative maximum knee flexion during swing.

    Maximum knee flexion angle during the swing phase of gait.

    1 year after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Change from preoperative maximum knee flexion during stance.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • Change from preoperative maximum knee flexion during stance.

    1 year after surgery.

  • Change from preoperative knee sagittal plane range of movement.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • Change from preoperative knee sagittal plane range of movement.

    1 year after surgery.

  • Change from preoperative knee coronal plane range of movement.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Statistical parametric mapping of sagittal plane knee kinematics.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • Statistical parametric mapping of sagittal plane knee kinematics.

    1 year after surgery.

  • Statistical parametric mapping of coronal plane knee kinematics.

    8-12 weeks after surgery.

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Stable, satisfied primary TKR

Participants who have a stable TKR (as assessed by the surgical team) and are satisfied with their knee replacement (as assessed by a questionnaire).

Other: No intervention.

Unstable, dissatisfied primary TKR

Participants who are dissatisfied with their TKR, with instability (including instability due to aseptic loosening) and consequently awaiting revision TKR.

Procedure: Revision TKR surgery

Interventions

This study will follow the cohort of patients who have an unstable primary TKR with which they are dissatisfied. They will be assessed before and after their revision TKR surgery.

Unstable, dissatisfied primary TKR

This study will also make a case-control comparison between patients with a stable primary TKR and an unstable primary TKR.

Stable, satisfied primary TKR

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients attending orthopaedic knee clincs at a tertiary referral hospital.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients awaiting revision TKR due to instability:
  • Patients who have a primary total knee replacement.
  • Patients who have an unstable knee replacement, as determined by the surgical team.
  • Patients who are being listed for a revision total knee replacement.
  • Primary TKR without instability:
  • Patients with a primary total knee replacement.
  • Patients at least one year after their primary total knee replacement operation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients awaiting revision TKR due to instability:
  • Patients who have suspected infection of the TKR.
  • Patients who are awaiting a two-stage revision procedure.
  • Patients who can walk less than one minute at a time.
  • Patients who can walk for less than five minutes with rests.
  • Patient who are not able to give informed consent.
  • Primary TKR without instability:
  • Patients who have had a previous revision of the total knee replacement.
  • Patients who have an unstable knee replacement, as determined by the surgical team.
  • Patients who have aseptic loosening or wear, as determined by the surgical team.
  • Patients who are not satisfied with their TKR (as determined by the study specific questionnaire).
  • Patients who can walk for less than one minute at a time.
  • Patients who can walk for less than five minutes with rests.
  • Patient who are not able to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Southmead Hospital

Bristol, BS161RJ, United Kingdom

Location

Study Officials

  • David J Bruce, BA, BMBCh

    University of Bath

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2019

First Posted

March 29, 2019

Study Start

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 21, 2022

Study Completion

February 21, 2022

Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The final anonymised raw and processed datasets will be made available for future research, as specified in the University of Bath's data management guidelines.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
Anonymised data will be made openly available to other researchers one year after completion of the study, or from the first publication using data from the study. The data will be stored on the Bath research archive for a period of at least 10 years.
Access Criteria
Anonymised data will be made available to bona fide researchers who will need to request access via the University of Bath research archive (https://researchdata.bath.ac.uk/).

Locations