Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Local Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Low back pain can be seen in every period of life. More than 80 percent of the society complain of low back pain at any time of life. Although the frequency of applying to a health institution due to low back pain varies from one society to the other, it takes place in the first three places in each community. Low back pain should be differentiated as new (acute) and long-term (chronic). In the treatment of chronic low back pain, rest, education, pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, painful point injections, surgical interventions, kinesio taping can be applied. The most frequently used physical therapy modalities for treatment of chronic low back pain are superficial and deep heat modalities (hot pack, infrared, ultrasound, microwave diathermy radar) and analgesic effective electrotherapy (TENS, interferential flows) modalities. One of the most important treatments is exercise therapy. In cases where conventional treatment of chronic low back pain is insufficient, that is, the patient's pain is still ongoing and functional recovery is insufficient, some alternative methods are also applied. These treatments include ozone, prolotherapy injection applications, dry needling, acupuncture, phytotherapy, balneotherapy, kinesio taping and so on. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of painful point injection and kinesio taping treatments in lumbar region in patients with chronic low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 2, 2020
CompletedApril 13, 2021
March 1, 2021
2 months
March 28, 2019
May 30, 2020
March 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain
day 0 (before intervention)
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain
day 16 (after 6th application)
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain
1 month after intervention
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
visual analog scale: minimum score: 0 maximum score: 10. Higher scores reflect more severe pain
3 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index
day 0 (before intervention)
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
day 16 (after 6th application)
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
1 month after intervention
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
3 months after intervention
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning
day 0 (before intervention)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
kinesio taping
EXPERIMENTALtwo 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally
sham kinesio taping
PLACEBO COMPARATORtwo 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally but without stretching
local anesthetic
EXPERIMENTAL18-20 cc %0.5 lidocaine subcutaneous injection
local serum physiologic
PLACEBO COMPARATOR18-20 cc % 0.09 NaCl subcutaneous injection
Interventions
two 15 cm I type kinesio tape applied longitudinally
local anesthetic: 18-20 cc %0.5 lidocaine subcutaneous injection
serum physiologic : 18-20 cc % 0.09 NaCl subcutaneous injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Under 18 years of age under 75 years
- Chronic mechanic (decreased with resting and resting) for at least 3 months
- Visual Analogue Scale score of at least 60-
You may not qualify if:
- Having mental problems
- Having the disease affecting the peripheral and central nervous system
- Have received physical therapy in the lumbar region within the last 3 months
- Injection into the lumbar region within the last 3 months
- Having a history of waist region surgery
- Low motor dysfunction in lower extremity in physical examination
- Needle phobia
- Is allergic to lidocaine
- Kinesio tape allergy
- Wound, infection, burn, allergic lesions in the application area
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sultan 2.Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Eyalet/Yerleşke, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Eyalet/Yerleşke, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Adem Erbirol
- Organization
- SultanAbdulhamid
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
ADEM ERBİROL
sultan abdulhamid han
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2019
First Posted
March 29, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 13, 2021
Results First Posted
July 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
other researchers would get information from the main researcher. therefore it was not shared.