Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and Pulse Contour Analysis in Renal Transplantation Patients
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemodynamics monitoring using non-invasive transthoracic electrical bioimpedance ICON are compatible with standard invasive monitoring using pulse contour analysis EV1000
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2019
CompletedJune 18, 2019
June 1, 2019
1 month
March 26, 2019
June 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hemodynamic correlation
Correlation between hemodynamic measured between devices: cardiac index, stroke volume index, systemic vascular resistance index, stroke volume index
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Changes in hemodynamic profiles: Cardiac Index
Intraoperative
Changes in hemodynamic profiles: Stroke Volume Index
Intraoperative
Changes in hemodynamic profiles: Systemic Vascular Resistance Index
Intraoperative
Changes in hemodynamic profiles: Stroke Volume Variation
Intraoperative
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients planned to undergo elective kidney transplantation surgery as recipient
You may qualify if:
- BMI 18.5 - 35 kg/m\^2
You may not qualify if:
- Heart function abnormalities (arrhythmia, AV block, using pacemaker, severe aorta stenosis)
- Morbid obesity
- Bradycardia (\< 50 bpm)
- Tachycardia (\> 110 bpm)
- refuse to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
Related Publications (27)
Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, Payen D, Perel A, Hoeft A, Romagnoli S, Ranieri VM, Ichai C, Forget P, Della Rocca G, Rhodes A. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015 May 8;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7.
PMID: 25953531BACKGROUNDJoosten A, Huynh T, Suehiro K, Canales C, Cannesson M, Rinehart J. Goal-Directed fluid therapy with closed-loop assistance during moderate risk surgery using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: A pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):886-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev002. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
PMID: 25690834BACKGROUNDPearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305.
PMID: 24842135BACKGROUNDHamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1392-402. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
PMID: 20966436BACKGROUNDSinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):909-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.909.
PMID: 9361539BACKGROUNDEdison E, Pearse R. Goal directed therapy in the perioperative setting: What is the evidence? In: Paradise Lost and the Cosmological Revolution. 2014.
BACKGROUNDAya HD, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Apr;42(2):56-65. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.2220141. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
PMID: 27366392BACKGROUNDSaugel B, Cecconi M, Wagner JY, Reuter DA. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):562-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu447. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PMID: 25596280BACKGROUNDAlhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):214. doi: 10.1186/cc9996. Epub 2011 Mar 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 21457508BACKGROUNDAllaria B, Poli DM CD. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring: invasive vs. non-invasive. In: Anesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - APICE. Italy: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 291-9.
BACKGROUNDBoyd O, Jackson N. How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management? Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):390-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3057. Epub 2005 Feb 9.
PMID: 16137389BACKGROUNDGoldfarb D, Poggio E. Etiology, pathogenesis, and management of renal failure. In: Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A, Peters C, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 1226-53.
BACKGROUNDAngelotti T, Lemmens H. Liver/Kidney/Pancreas transplantation. In: Jaffe R, Schmiesing C, Golianu B, editors. Anesthesiologist's Manual of Surgical Procedures. 5th editio. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014. p. 1097-100.
BACKGROUNDDarovic G. Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive and noninvasive clinical applications. 3rd ed. Darovic G, editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002. 191-260 p.
BACKGROUNDBendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, Simon TP, Geisen M, Hoeft A, Siegenthaler N, Hofer CK. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):573-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet116. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
PMID: 23625132BACKGROUNDKiefer N, Hofer CK, Marx G, Geisen M, Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Hoeft A, Bendjelid K, Rex S. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. Crit Care. 2012 May 30;16(3):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc11366.
PMID: 22647561BACKGROUNDMarque S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc7884. Epub 2009 May 19.
PMID: 19454009BACKGROUNDConnor C. Commonly used monitoring techniques. In: Barash P, Cullen B, Stoelting R, Cahalan M, Stock C, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2013. p. 712-20.
BACKGROUNDMehta Y, Arora D. Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring. World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):1022-9. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.1022.
PMID: 25276302BACKGROUNDPorhomayon J, El-Solh A, Papadakos P, Nader ND. Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review. Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0738-9. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
PMID: 22147648BACKGROUNDChamos C, Vele L, Hamilton M, Cecconi M. Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013 Sep 17;2(1):19. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-19.
PMID: 24472443BACKGROUNDPeyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1220-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130.
PMID: 20881596BACKGROUNDFrolich M. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Butterworth J, Mackey D, Wasnick J, editors. Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013. p. 87-122.
BACKGROUNDSuttner S, Schollhorn T, Boldt J, Mayer J, Rohm KD, Lang K, Piper SN. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Dec;32(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0409-x. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
PMID: 17039348BACKGROUNDFellahi JL, Caille V, Charron C, Deschamps-Berger PH, Vieillard-Baron A. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1553-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819cd97e.
PMID: 19372335BACKGROUNDSodolski T, Kutarski A. Impedance cardiography: A valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. Cardiol J. 2007;14(2):115-26.
PMID: 18651447BACKGROUNDMonnet X, Teboul JL. Minimally invasive monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.002.
PMID: 25435477BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Anesthesiologist Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2019
First Posted
March 28, 2019
Study Start
March 12, 2019
Primary Completion
April 12, 2019
Study Completion
May 12, 2019
Last Updated
June 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06