Vehicle Automation Impact on Drivers
AUTODRIVE
On the Highway to Autonomous Driving: How is Automation Changing Humans: Investigations of Drivers' Behaviors, Representations and Neural Processes
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the context of ever-increasing automation in surface vehicles, automation impact on drivers will be investigated through three complementary research axes undertaken under simulated driving: Axe 1 (Cognitive ergonomics), how automation is impacting driving behaviors and visual explorations? Axe 2 (Experimental psychology), how automation is impacting drivers' mental representations of their own driving abilities? Axe 3 (Neuroimaging), how automation is modifying the car driving neural network? And what are drivers' mental representations neural bases? The project tackle both applied and basic research issues using an original experimental neuro ergonomics approach. AUTODRIVE will bring original data on human-machine cooperation, mental representations, cognitive control and brain processes depending on the characteristics of the automation used over a significant period of time (six weeks) on a large sample (N=120) of experienced and inexperienced drivers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 8, 2023
CompletedJuly 13, 2021
July 1, 2021
3.8 years
March 8, 2019
July 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
BOLD effect
Functional magnetic resonance imaging measures brain activity by detecting changes associated with blood flow This technique relies on the fact that cerebral blood flow and neuronal activation are coupled. When an area of the brain is in use, blood flow to that region also increases. The primary form of fMRI uses the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast in response to an experimental condition (Ogawa, Lee, Kay, \& Tank, 1990), allowing researchers to track changes in oxygen consumption on the brain, and therefore brain activity. BOLD effect is computed by assessing the different relaxation times (T1 and T2) in the brain, as T1 and T2 are different in function of regional cerebral blood flows. The outcome will be a change between mean BOLD effect oven session 1 versus session 2 versus session 3.
Repetition Time (TR) :every 3 seconds, during the 3 fMRI sessions of respectively 1 hour, 0,75 hour and 0,75 hour. fMRI session 2 occurs 3 weeks after fMRI session 1 and 3 weeks before fMRI session 3.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Behavioral changes
Two experimental sessions of an hour, one before and one after the six weeks of automated driving. Plus six driving sessions of 0,5 hour, one driving session the first day of each experimental week.
Study Arms (6)
UnAssisted (UA)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to driving a vehicle manually without any vehicle automation technology. It will serve as a baseline concerning behaviors, representations and neural results associated with unassisted automobile driving.
Assisted (A)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to driving with warning technology which upon activation sounds an a warning when the vehicle is too close to the edge of the road (off-road warning , Navarro, Mars, \& Hoc, 2007; Suzuki \& Jansson, 2003) or too close to the vehicle in front of it (anti-collision warning; Lee, McGehee, Brown, \& Reyes, 2002).
Shared Control (SC)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to shared tactical control between the driver and the automated assistive technology, both working simultaneously on the physical trajectory of the vehicle, laterally (Griffiths \& Gillespie, 2005; Mulder, Abbink, \& Boer, 2012) as well as longitudinal (Adell, Várhelyi, \& Hjälmdahl, 2008).
Partly Autonomous (PA)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to a situation where the lateral and longitudinal control of the driving are delegated to the automated assistive technology. It consists of a level of automatisation that today is possible to put into application and which often is referred to by the name "Highly Automated Driving" (Navarro, 2018). In this case, the driver is no longer the one who physically ensures the lateral and longitudinal control of the vehicle, but instead supervises the actions of the automated assistive technology.
Fully Autonomous (FA)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to a completely automated driving experience. The on-board technologies take over all the driving tasks for any driving situation.
Any Automation (AA)
EXPERIMENTALThis term refers to a situation where the drivers can choose the automation device of their choice among the five types presented above and can change it whenever they think it is good to do so.
Interventions
From no automation of the vehicle to full automation through warnings, shared control and partly automated automation levels.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be between the ages of 22 and 45 years old
- Having given an informed consent for the study
- Being registered with the French Social Security System
- No driving license for 60 participants
- Driving license for 4 years or more for 60 participants
You may not qualify if:
- No signature on the consent form
- Inability to read or write French.
- Substance intake ( taking psychoactive medications or recreational drugs) on the day of the experiment
- Noise intolerance
- Need of vision glasses to drive
- Persons under curators or deprived of civil rights or deprived of their freedom
- Unable to fill a questionnaire (severe cognitive troubles)
- Subjects must not have metallic or electronic implants in the body : pacemakers or pacemaker wires, open heart surgery, artificial heart valve, brain aneurysm surgery, middle ear implant, hearing aid, braces or extensive dental work, cataract surgery or lens implant, implanted mechanical or electrical device, or artificial limb or joint o foreign metallic objects in the body (bullets, BBs, pellets, shrapnel, or metalwork fragments) or current or past employment as machinists, welders or metal workers, tattoos near the head or neck regions, permanent makeup
- Claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC)
Bron, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jordan Navarro, MD
: Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC) -Université Lumière Lyon 2
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2019
First Posted
March 27, 2019
Study Start
October 8, 2019
Primary Completion
July 8, 2023
Study Completion
July 8, 2023
Last Updated
July 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07