Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare skin closure via subcuticular suture versus tissue adhesive (Dermabond) in urogynecological robotic surgeries. The primary outcome is incision cosmesis at the 12 week follow up visit. Secondary outcome is the operative time between the two methods of closure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2019
CompletedApril 4, 2019
April 1, 2019
10 months
March 18, 2018
April 2, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incision Cosmesis
Our primary outcome measure is to compare incision cosmesis between the two closure methods at the 12 week postoperative visit. The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation scale is used. A point is awarded in each of the following categories: width, height, color, hatch/suture marks, overall appearance. Poorer cosmesis is indicated by a lower score. Highest score possible is 5 points.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incision closure time
30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Tissue Adhesives Only
EXPERIMENTALFor the tissue adhesive, we will use Dermabond, which was FDA approved for skin closure in 1998. We will record the length of time of each closure method for comparison, and have patients follow-up at two, six and 12 weeks. At the 12 week visit we will score the appearance of the incision.
Subcuticular Suture Closure Method Only
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the suture arm we will only close the subcuticular layer. We will record the length of time of each closure method for comparison, and have patients follow-up at two, six and 12 weeks. At the 12 week visit we will score the appearance of the incision.
Interventions
We will only close the subcuticular layer with suture
No subcuticular closure will be done. Only tissue adhesives applied to the approximated skin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women, ages 18 years and older, undergoing any urogynecologic robotic procedure at St. John Hospital and Medical Center from March 19, 2018 - November 30, 2018.
You may not qualify if:
- We will exclude women with active skin infections as they may contribute to poor wound healing and infections. We will also exclude procedures that are converted to laparotomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The evaluators of cosmesis will be blind to the group assignment. The person who will evaluate the scars will be a nurse or medical assistant.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2018
First Posted
March 26, 2019
Study Start
March 20, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04