NCT03888885

Brief Summary

This project examines the effects of implementing sport education model in university required physical education lessons on perceived physical literacy and physical activity levels of the students.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
410

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 7, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2019

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 18, 2019

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 5, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

March 21, 2019

Results QC Date

August 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Physical EducationSport EducationPhysical LiteracyPhysical ActivityUniversity Students

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Self-report Physical Activity Levels

    The globally standardized and validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form was used to measure self-reported physical activity levels. Four generic items of vigorous, moderate, walking and sitting were included to obtain the physical activity levels from the participants. Example items included: During the last 7 days, on how many days did you do vigorous physical activities like heavy lifting, digging, aerobics, or fast bicycling (vigorous)? They are required to answer the total duration of different types of physical activity which was at least 10 uninterrupted minutes in the last 7 days. The following values continue to be used for the analysis: Walking = 3.3 METs, Moderate PA = 4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. The metabolic equivalent minutes/ week (MET-minutes/week) was calculated by this formula: 8 \* vigorous-intensity activity minutes \* days + 4 \* moderate-intensity activity minutes \* days + 3.3 \* walking-intensity activity minutes \* days.

    Change from Baseline Self-report Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)

  • Objective Physical Activity Levels

    The accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+) will be used in this study to measure the dynamic range from -6 to +6 with 3 axes and 3mg/ LSB of sensitivity. A sub-sample of 64 participants was randomly selected to wear accelerometers to measure their objective physical activity levels for at least 8 hours per day, in 7 consecutive days (ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA). The data will be uploaded onto the computer and analyzed by ActiLife 6 software. Only 47 of their data were analyzed because the participants met the eligibility of wearing at least 8 hours per day in at least 5 days. Participants' objective physical activity levels will be categorized as sedentary, light, moderate or vigorous. Accordingly, metabolic equivalents were calculated automatically in its software that a higher value represents a better outcome.

    Change from Baseline Objective Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Motivational Climate

    Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)

  • Situational Motivation

    Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)

  • Perceived Physical Literacy

    Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)

  • Physical Activity Enjoyment

    Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)

  • Fitness Instruction Time of Physical Education Lessons

    The 1st lesson (Baseline) to the 10th lesson (11th week)

Study Arms (2)

Sport Education Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants participated in the required physical education lessons which were delivered in a season of sport education model for 10 lessons.

Behavioral: Sport Education Model

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants received no intervention treatment. They were asked to attend in normal physical education classes for the same period of time.

Interventions

A total number of 25 lecturers participated in the 12-hour CPD workshop on Sport Education curriculum on June 2018. The content of the workshop focused on the development of a Sport Education season, the changing roles of teachers and students, the assessment of personal and social responsibility, and the application of sport education season and related pedagogies on handball, badminton, swimming and physical conditioning. The Sport Education courseware and class materials were then designed by the eligible lecturers. The intervention was lasted for 10-lesson, 1-day per week and the duration for each lesson was around 90 minutes. The specific five phases in Sport Education model of team selection, teacher-directed, pre-season, formal competition and cumulating event were included. The eligible lecturers led the lessons according to the designated course wares and lesson plans for each sport.

Sport Education Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physical education classes: universities in Hong Kong which are funded by the University Grants Committee and provides required PE lessons.
  • Lecturers: graduated from master's degree or above, more than 5 years of teaching experience, in addition with the attendance of 12-hour continuing professional development workshop on Sport Education curriculum.
  • Students: aged 18 or above, enrolled in 1-credit required physical education lessons and indicated all statements negatively in the self-screening Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2017).

You may not qualify if:

  • did not wish to participate;
  • have currently used their own wearable activity tracker;
  • indicated any major physical, psychiatric, or cardiovascular-related problems diagnosed by a physician.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Booth M. Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71 Suppl 2:114-20. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082794. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25680021BACKGROUND
  • Hastie, P., & Wallhead, T. (2015). Operationalizing physical literacy through sport education. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 132-138. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2015.04.001

    BACKGROUND
  • McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., & Nader, P. R. (1992). SOFIT: System for observing fitness instruction time. Journal of teaching in physical Education, 11(2), 195-205.

    BACKGROUND
  • Milton, D., Appleton, P. R., Bryant, A., & Duda, J. L. (2018). Initial Validation of the Teacher-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(4), 340-351.

    BACKGROUND
  • Motl RW, Dishman RK, Saunders R, Dowda M, Felton G, Pate RR. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00326-9.

    PMID: 11457630BACKGROUND
  • Sum RK, Ha AS, Cheng CF, Chung PK, Yiu KT, Kuo CC, Yu CK, Wang FJ. Construction and Validation of a Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Physical Education Teachers. PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155610. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27195664BACKGROUND
  • Sum RKW, Cheng CF, Wallhead T, Kuo CC, Wang FJ, Choi SM. Perceived physical literacy instrument for adolescents: A further validation of PPLI. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2018 Apr;16(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

    PMID: 30662489BACKGROUND
  • Whitehead, M. E. (2013). Stages in physical literacy journey. International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education Bulletin, 65, 51-55.

    BACKGROUND
  • Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.

    PMID: 12900694BACKGROUND
  • Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):247-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1.

    PMID: 22818937BACKGROUND
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.

    PMID: 11392867BACKGROUND
  • Sum, K. W. R., Wallhead, T., Ha, S., & Sit, H. (2018). Effects of physical education continuing professional development on teachers' physical literacy and self-efficacy and students' learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 1-8.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Sum Kim Wai Raymond
Organization
The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study Officials

  • Kim Wai Raymond Sum, EdD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Siu Ming Choi, PhD

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Student, Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2019

First Posted

March 25, 2019

Study Start

January 7, 2019

Primary Completion

April 18, 2019

Study Completion

April 18, 2019

Last Updated

July 18, 2022

Results First Posted

July 5, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The data will be provided after publication for 6 months.
Access Criteria
All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available publicly.

Locations