NCT03888378

Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two strengths of HY02 Ointment versus Vehicle administered twice daily for twelve weeks in subjects with a diagnosis of Inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
270

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

20 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 2, 2019

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 18, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Minocycline TopicalTetracyclineDoxycyclineMGDMeibomian Gland DisorderAnti-Bacterial AgentAnti-imflammatory AgentMinocycline

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change from baseline in Vascular Engorgement in 1% HY02 Ointment compared to vehicle at week 12

    Changes in Vascular Engorgement at the study eyelid margin are graded on a 5-point scale (0-4) with 0 representing minimal vascular engorgement and 4 representing maximal vascular engorgement. A lower score represents a better outcome for the subject.

    12 Weeks

  • Change from baseline in Eye Discomfort Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at week 12 in the 1% HY02 Ointment arm compared to vehicle

    Eye discomfort will be evaluated on a subject reported visual analog scale. The scores range from 0 (no discomfort) to 100 (maximal discomfort). Lower score indicate a better outcome for the subject.

    12 Weeks

  • Change from baseline in Vascular Engorgement in 0.3% HY02 Ointment compared to vehicle at week 12

    Changes in Vascular Engorgement at the study eyelid margin are graded on a 5-point scale (0-4) with 0 representing minimal vascular engorgement and 4 representing maximal vascular engorgement. A lower score represents a better outcome for the subject.

    12 Weeks

  • Change from baseline in Eye Discomfort Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at week 12 in the 0.3% HY02 Ointment arm compared to vehicle

    Eye discomfort will be evaluated on a subject reported visual analog scale. The scores range from 0 (no discomfort) to 100 (maximal discomfort). Lower score indicate a better outcome for the subject.

    12 Weeks

Study Arms (3)

0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical administration of 0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

Drug: 0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment

1% Topical Minocycline Ointment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical administration of 1% Topical Minocycline Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

Drug: 1% Topical Minocycline Ointment

Topical Vehicle Ointment

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Topical administration of Topical Vehicle Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

Other: Topical Vehicle Ointment

Interventions

0.3% Topical Minocycline ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 0.3%
0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment

1% Topical Minocycline ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 1%
1% Topical Minocycline Ointment

Topical vehicle ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 0%
Topical Vehicle Ointment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At Visit 1, individuals of any gender or any race will be eligible for study participation if they:
  • Have provided written informed consent prior to any study procedures.
  • Are 18 years of age or above.
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe MGD and who meet the following criteria, in a qualifying eyelid, at both Visit 1 (Screening) and Visit 2 (Randomization) examinations:
  • Clinical sign severity score of at least 2 (moderate) on vascular engorgement at the eyelid margin and
  • Clinical sign severity score of at least 2 (moderate) on plugging of the meibomian glands.
  • Eye Discomfort Symptom score of ≥ 40 using VAS (0-100 point scale)
  • Fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) total score ≥ 3 in the inferior, central, and nasal region combined score (NEI/Industry Workshop sections 1, 4 and 5 with 0-9 scale)
  • Schirmer score of \>7 mm without topical anesthesia
  • Are willing and able to follow instructions and can be present for the required study visits for the duration of the study.
  • Have a BCVA, using corrective lenses if necessary, in both eyes of at least +0.7 as assessed by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or modified ETDRS.
  • If female, are non-pregnant, non-lactating and women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an acceptable method of birth control \[e.g., an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD) with a failure rate of \<1%, hormonal contraceptives, or a barrier method\] for the duration of the study. If a female subject is currently abstinent, they must agree to use one of the acceptable methods of birth control before they become sexually active.

You may not qualify if:

  • In order for subjects to be eligible at Visit 1 they may not:
  • Have presence of inflammation and/or active structural change in the iris or anterior chamber.
  • Have lid structural abnormalities such as entropion or ectropion.
  • Subjects with ocular inflammatory conditions (e.g., conjunctivitis, keratitis, anterior blepharitis, etc.) not related to MGD.
  • Subjects who have FCS total score = 15 or a score = 3, in either eye, in the superior region NEI/Industry Workshop scale or subjects who have FCS with diffuse confluent staining, filaments or frank epithelial defects.
  • Have suspected ocular fungal, viral or bacterial infection.
  • Have had penetrating intraocular surgery in the past 90 days or require penetrating intraocular surgery during the study.
  • Have had ocular surface surgery within 12 months of Visit 1 (e.g., LASIK, refractive, pterygium removal).
  • Subjects who within the past 90 days have had cauterization of the punctum or changes to the status (insertion or removal) of punctal plug(s) before the Screening Visit.
  • Have used topical ocular or oral antibiotics within 30 days of the study or expect to use during the study.
  • Have used LipiFlow or hypochlorous acid spray within 30 days of the study or expect to use during the study.
  • If using inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids, unable to maintain a stable dose for the duration of the study.
  • Have ever used isotretinoin.
  • If using Omega-3 supplements, dose must be stable for 3 months prior to Visit 1 and for the duration of the study.
  • Have used topical cyclosporine within 30 days of the study or during the study.
  • +17 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (20)

Clinical site - 4

Azusa, California, 91702, United States

Location

Clinical site - 16

Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States

Location

Clinical site - 12

Inglewood, California, 90301, United States

Location

Clinical site - 13

Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States

Location

Clinical site 10

Rancho Cordova, California, 95670, United States

Location

Clinical site - 15

Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States

Location

Clinical Site - 18

Largo, Florida, 33773, United States

Location

Clinical site - 6

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States

Location

Clinical site - 20

New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States

Location

Clinical site - 19

Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States

Location

Clinical site - 3

St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States

Location

Clinical site - 9

St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States

Location

Clinical site - 7

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89145, United States

Location

Clinical site - 5

Asheville, North Carolina, 28803, United States

Location

Clinical site - 11

Mason, Ohio, 45040, United States

Location

Clinical site - 2

Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States

Location

Clinical site - 14

Cedar Park, Texas, 78613, United States

Location

Clinical Site - 1

El Paso, Texas, 79902, United States

Location

Clinical site - 8

League City, Texas, 77573, United States

Location

Clinical site - 17

Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunctioncyclopia sequence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eyelid DiseasesEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • George Magrath, MD

    Hovione Scientia Limited

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Care provider is a designated dosing coordinator who will be unblinded for this study. Both participant and investigator will be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2019

First Posted

March 25, 2019

Study Start

April 2, 2019

Primary Completion

September 18, 2020

Study Completion

February 1, 2021

Last Updated

March 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations