NCT03886259

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether a 12-week neuromuscular rehabilitation program (NEMEX-TJR) combined with pain neuroscience education (PNE) provides greater pain relief, improvement in physical function and quality of life than PNE alone in a population of patients with chronic pain after primary total knee arthroplasty. Hypothesis: Rehabilitation involving neuromuscular training and PNE will provide greater pain relief, improved function and improved quality of life compared to PNE alone at the primary endpoint, which is follow-up 12months after the start of the treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 22, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 21, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 8, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic PainTotal Knee ArthroplastyPain Neuroscience EducationNeuromuscular exercise (NEMEX-TJR)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score4 (KOOS4) from baseline to 12months follow-up

    The average score for four of the five KOOS subscales, covering pain, symptoms, difficulties in functions of daily living, and quality of life (KOOS4), with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Between group comparisons of treatment effect (change in KOOS4 from baseline to 1 year follow-up) will be performed.

    Baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Change in all five subscales of the KOOS

    Baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Rating of Global Perceived Effect

    3, 6 and 12 months

  • Change in maximal pain intensity during rest (day and night), stair climbing, and walking on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Change in use of Pain Medication

    Baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months

  • Number of adverse events related to interventions

    3 months

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Exercise and pain neuroscience education

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects with chronic pain after total knee replacement will receive 24 sessions of neuromuscular exercise therapy, supervised by a physiotherapist, and two sessions of pain neuroscience education, conducted by a physiotherapist

Other: Neuromuscular exercises (NEMEX-TJR) and pain neuroscience education

Pain neuroscience education

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects with chronic pain after total knee replacement will receive two sessions of pain neuroscience education, conducted by a physiotherapist

Other: Pain neuroscience education

Interventions

60min. of neuromuscular exercises (NEMEX-TJR) training two times a week for 3 months (12 weeks, 24 sessions). Physiotherapists will instruct and supervise the participants during the neuromuscular exercises. The aim of the neuromuscular exercise program is to restore normal movement, improve sensorimotor control, re-establishing normal motor program strategies and muscle activation. 60min. of pain neuroscience education at the beginning of intervention period and after 6 weeks. Both sessions will take 60min. and will be conducted by physiotherapists. The aim of the pain neuroscience education is to increase the pain neuroscience knowledge of the patients leading to a better understanding of their chronic pain and thereby engaging the patients in the treatment of their chronic pain and impaired function.

Exercise and pain neuroscience education

60min. of pain neuroscience education at the beginning of intervention period and after 6 weeks. Both sessions will take 60min. and will be conducted by physiotherapists. The aim of the pain neuroscience education is to increase the pain neuroscience knowledge of the patients leading to a better understanding of their chronic pain and thereby engaging the patients in the treatment of their chronic pain and impaired function.

Pain neuroscience education

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) between 19-40
  • Subjects with primary total knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis ≥ 12 months post-operatively
  • For the index knee, duration of knee pain \> 6 months
  • For the index knee, the average daily pain score ≥ 4 (moderate-to-severe pain) over the last week prior to visit on a numeric rating scale

You may not qualify if:

  • Specific reasons for chronic pain, such as loosening of implant, which requires revision surgery
  • Secondary causes of arthritis to the knee, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis
  • Surgery (including arthroscopy) of the index knee within 3 months prior to visit
  • Injury to the index knee within 12 months prior to visit
  • Recent history of acute pain affecting the lower limb and/or trunk
  • Participation in other pain trials two weeks prior to this study
  • Pregnancy
  • Drug and alcohol abuse
  • Previous neurologic illnesses or primary pain area other than knee, e.g. lower back, upper extremity pain or rheumatoid arthritis
  • Lack of ability to adhere to protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Department of Occupational and Physiotherapy, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, 9000, Denmark

Location

Department of Occupational- and Physiotherapy, Aalborg University Hospital

Farsø, 9640, Denmark

Location

Department of Occupational- and Physiotherapy, Aalborg University Hospital

Thisted, 7700, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.91.

    PMID: 11156538BACKGROUND
  • Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):965-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71086-2.

    PMID: 15766999BACKGROUND
  • Davidson D, de Steiger R, Graves S, Tomkins A et al. Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. annual report. Adelaide:AOA;2010. . 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

    PMID: 22398175BACKGROUND
  • Bhave A, Mont M, Tennis S, Nickey M, Starr R, Etienne G. Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip and knee joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:9-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00628. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16326719BACKGROUND
  • Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID. Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee. 2007 Dec;14(6):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

    PMID: 17596949BACKGROUND
  • Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. Print 2012.

    PMID: 22357571BACKGROUND
  • Wylde V, Dennis J, Beswick AD, Bruce J, Eccleston C, Howells N, Peters TJ, Gooberman-Hill R. Systematic review of management of chronic pain after surgery. Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1293-1306. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10601. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

    PMID: 28681962BACKGROUND
  • Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R. Interventions for the prediction and management of chronic postsurgical pain after total knee replacement: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2015 May 12;5(5):e007387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007387.

    PMID: 25967998BACKGROUND
  • Larsen JB, Skou ST, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O, Madeleine P. Neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education compared with pain neuroscience education alone in patients with chronic pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for the NEPNEP randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 24;21(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4126-5.

    PMID: 32197629BACKGROUND
  • Larsen JB, Skou ST, Laursen M, Bruun NH, Arendt-Nielsen L, Madeleine P. Exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients With Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12179.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Pascal Madeleine, Dr.Scient

    Aalborg University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Søren T Skou, PhD

    University of Southern Denmark and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Ole Simonsen, Dr.Med

    Aalborg University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Dr.Med

    Aalborg University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Jesper B Larsen, M.Sc.

    Aalborg University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mogens B Laursen, PhD

    Aalborg University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors will be blinded towards group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD-student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Posted

March 22, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 21, 2023

Study Completion

April 8, 2024

Last Updated

May 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual subject data that underlie the results reported in the publication will be shared after deidentification (text, tables, figures, appendices)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months following publication. No end date.
Access Criteria
Researchers that provide a methodologically sound plan

Locations