NCT03886064

Brief Summary

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. 17.5 million people died in 2012 due to CVD (31% of all causes of death). In Europe more than 50% of deaths are due to CVD. The CVD mortality rate is higher in the lower socio-economic levels. Three quarters of CVD deaths occur in developing countries (LDCs). According to estimates in 2030, CVD will be responsible for more deaths than the sum of infectious, nutritional, maternal and perinatal diseases in developing countries. The lack of an adequate primary care network in developing countries limits the screening and treatment of people with CVRF. As a result, these people do not benefit from appropriate prevention, are diagnosed late and remain disabled or die at a young age, resulting in significant additional costs for families but also at the macroeconomic level. Cardiovascular risk factor prevention measures (CVRF) have been shown to be effective. Interventions are possible on a large scale (policies against smoking and unfavorable eating habits, promoting physical activity, etc.). Actions are possible at the individual level, both in primary prevention (fight against the FDRCV) and secondary, where many treatments have proven their effectiveness. These interventions are effective and profitable from a macroeconomic point of view. It has been estimated that the cost for such interventions would not exceed 4% of health expenditure in developing countries and 1-2% in rich countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses the importance of the triad composed by the patient and his family, the community and health professionals. Results are possible only when these three components work together for the same purpose. Many studies show the benefit of people's involvement in care in rich and developing countries. SPICES project builds on progress in HIV / AIDS treatment in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and chronic disease management through the Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC Framework), WHO plan. With regard to HIV treatment, these interventions have proven to be effective and cost-effective in many SSA countries, both in terms of disease control and adherence. These data on communicable and infectious diseases seem to be transferable to non-communicable diseases. These projects were born from the observation that the model of care of the rich countries (individual approach of the patient, centered on the hospital and the specialist with a regular clinical and paraclinical follow-up) could not be transposed to the developing countries, because the limitation of human, technical and financial resources. But also that this model was becoming more and more difficult to maintain in developed countries or resources become limited. New approaches need to be developed to increase the effectiveness of health systems. A paradigm shift is needed to improve the control of CVD with greater cost-effectiveness. The SPICES project incorporates the most up-to-date knowledge to improve the prevention and control of CVD in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Rich countries and developing countries are therefore involved in the study. The selected sites are France, United Kingdom, Belgium, South Africa and Uganda. Some main axes of the ICCC Framework will be developed in SPICES:

  • improve the efficiency of health professionals through the delegation of skills and appropriate training,
  • center care around the patient and his family and more generally his caregivers,
  • simplify the monitoring and treatment protocols,
  • support patients in their community and emphasize prevention, information and patient education. A first step of observation in the various countries made it possible to make an inventory of fixtures and to target the most adapted interventions. The following steps are the implementation of these interventions (delegation of skills, information campaign and screening, improve the availability of treatments, measure of strengthening of compliance, etc. ..) and their evaluation. This study, carried out in France and integrated into the SPICES project, will test the best non-pharmacological interventions selected in the community and by the community.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
583

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 22, 2019

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 16, 2019

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 5, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 5, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 15, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of the non laboratory Interheart risk score

    Comparison of the Non Laboratory Interheart risk average score between the two arms at 24 months. This scale is used to predict incident cardiovascular disease.This score is summed and is calculated from questions about family history, type of diet and sports activities.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Measurement of the quality of life

    24 months

  • BMI

    24 months

  • Evaluation of the level of smoking

    24 months

  • Improvement of the diet

    24 months

  • Level of physical activity

    24 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Only measurement of clinical endpoints at time zero, then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and minimal counseling.

Interventional group

OTHER

Measurement of clinical endpoints at time zero, then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and minimal counseling followed by multi-behavioral intervention adapted to local resources.

Other: Multi-behavioral intervention

Interventions

The interventional group will then meet regularly under the aegis of the trainer to work on modifying each person's risk factors. The one-hour sessions will be scheduled every two weeks for two months and then every month for two months and then every three months until the end of the study (13 sessions). These sessions will be behavior change sessions, focused on goal setting, action planning, and problem solving. Trainers will facilitate these sessions and use motivational interviewing techniques

Interventional group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Within the general population, all persons over 18 years of age living or working in the country Center Bretagne (including Pays Pays Ouest Bretagne, Pleyben and Callac) with a moderate cardiovascular risk score based on the Interheart clinical risk score (score 9-15).

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Age under 18 years old
  • Patient in secondary cardiovascular prevention
  • Nobody living or working in Central Brittany (Pays Center Ouest Bretagne and Pays de Pleyben and Callac)
  • Low (\<9) or high cardiovascular risk score by Interheart score (\> 15).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

LE GOFF

La Forest-Landerneau, France

Location

LE RESTE

Lanmeur, 29260, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Le Goff D, Aerts N, Odorico M, Guillou-Landreat M, Perraud G, Bastiaens H, Musinguzi G, Le Reste JY, Barais M. Practical dietary interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease suitable for implementation in primary care: an ADAPTE-guided systematic review of international clinical guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 28;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01463-9.

  • Le Goff D, Barais M, Perraud G, Derriennic J, Aujoulat P, Guillou-Landreat M, Le Reste JY. Innovative cardiovascular primary prevention population-based strategies: a 2-year hybrid type 1 implementation randomised control trial (RCT) which evaluates behavioural change conducted by community champions compared with brief advice only from the SPICES project (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and sub-Saharan Africa). BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;21(1):1422. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11443-y.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Posted

March 22, 2019

Study Start

April 16, 2019

Primary Completion

January 5, 2022

Study Completion

January 5, 2022

Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Data will be available beginning five years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion
Access Criteria
Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

Locations