Motivational Strategies in Batterer Intervention Programs for Offenders With Alcohol/Drug Abuse Problems (IMP-ADAPs)
IMP-ADAPs
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alcohol and/or drug abuse problems (ADAPs) have been consistently identified in the scientific literature as a risk factor of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). Around 50% of IPVAW offenders referred to batterer intervention programs (BIPs) have ADAPs. ADAPs are also one of the main predictors of BIPs dropout. In Spain, the majority of BIPs do not fit the intervention to specific needs or characteristics of IPVAW offenders, such as those with ADAPs. The aim of this research is to assess the effectiveness of a new motivational strategy adapted to IPVAW offenders with ADAPs, aiming to increase treatment adherence and to improve BIPs outcomes. The motivational strategy will include an individualized motivational plan (IMP) developed for each participant with ADAPs (IMP-ADAPs). In these IMPs one of the main aims will be to reduce alcohol and/or drug consumption. The current study will use a randomized control trial. Participants with ADAPs will be allocated to one of two treatment conditions: experimental condition: Standard batterer intervention program (SBIP) plus individualized motivational plan focused in ADAPs (SBIP+ ADAPs-IMP), and control condition: Standard batterer intervention program plus individualized motivational plan (SBIP+IMP). Primary/final outcomes will be recidivism and ADAPs reduction. Secondary/proximal outcomes will include treatment adherence related variables, violence related attitudes and attributions, self-control and psychological adjustment. Outcome variables will be assessed at baseline, at the end of the intervention, and at six months after the intervention will be finished.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedDecember 6, 2023
December 1, 2023
6.7 years
February 5, 2019
December 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in alcohol abuse problems
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Saunders, Aasland, Babor, De la Fuente, \& Grant, 1993. Total scale range: 0-20 (Higher values indicate worse outcome).
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Change in cannabis abuse problems
Severity Dependence Scale. Gossop et al., 1995. Total scale range: 0-15 (Higher values indicate worse outcome).
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Change in cocaine abuse problems
Severity Dependence Scale. Gossop et al., 1995. Total scale range: 0-15 (Higher values indicate worse outcome).
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Change in self-reported physical intimate partner violence against women
Self-reported physical violence sub-scale from the Conflict Tacticts Scale. Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy y Sugarman, 1996. Total scale range: 0-72 (Higher values indicate worse outcome).
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Change in self-reported psychological intimate partner violence against women
Self-reported psychological violence sub-scale from the Conflict Tacticts Scale. Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy y Sugarman, 1996. Total scale range: 0-72 (Higher values indicate worse outcome).
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Change in risk of recidivism
The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment. SARA; Kropp y Hart, 2000. Total scale range: 0-40 (Higher values indicate worse outcome)
At baseline, at 12 months (end of intervention), and at 18 months (follow-up)
Police-reported recidivism
Ministry of Home Affairs' monitoring system for IPV. This system includes information on further incidents of violence by individuals convicted of IPV and reported by any of the institutions involved in victim protection services. Recidivism will be considered to have occurred when this information appear in the system in the 6 months after completing the intervention.
At 18 months (follow-up)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Therapeutic alliance
4 weeks after the first session of the intervention
Change in motivation
At baseline, at 6 months, and at 12 months (end of intervention)
Change in impulsivity
At baseline and at 12 months (end of intervention)
Change in depressive symptomatology
At baseline and at 12 months (end of intervention)
Change in self-esteem
At baseline and at 12 months (end of intervention)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SBIP+ ADAPs-IMP
EXPERIMENTALExperimental condition: Standard batterer intervention program (SBIP) plus individualized motivational plan (IMP) focused in alcohol and/or drugs abuse problems (ADAPs).
SBIP+IMP
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl condition: Standard batterer intervention program plus individualized motivational plan (SBIP+IMP)
Interventions
Standard batterer intervention program plus Individualized Motivational Plans adapted to alcohol and/or drug abuse problems. The SBIP consist of 70 hr of a cognitive-behavioral intervention including discussion topics such as sexism, sex roles, and gender equality. The intervention phase consisted of six modules in which different intervention techniques were applied (i.e., group dynamics, roleplaying, videos, training in cognitive restructuring, emotion management skills). The IMP included a set of motivational strategies to increase treatment compliance and motivation for change and had four main strategies: (a) five individual motivational interviews, to identify IPV related personal goals and follow up their achievement (in this case, one of the goals has to be related to ADAPs); (b) three group sessions where participants share their goals; (c) therapists follow-up and reinforcement of participants' goals; and (d) use of retention techniques.
Standard batterer intervention program plus Individualized Motivational Plans. The SBIP consist of 70 hr of a cognitive-behavioral intervention including discussion topics such as sexism, sex roles, and gender equality. The intervention phase consist of six modules in which different intervention techniques are applied (i.e., group dynamics, roleplaying, videos, training in cognitive restructuring, emotion management skills). The IMP include a set of motivational strategies to increase treatment compliance and motivation for change and has four main strategies: (a) five individual motivational interviews, to identify IPV related personal goals and follow up their achievement; (b) three group sessions where participants share their goals, explain their progress to the group, and receive feedback, support and advice from the group; (c) therapists follow-up and reinforcement of participants' goals; and (d) use of retention techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males convicted of IPV against their partner or ex-partner
- Alcohol and/or drugs abuse problems
You may not qualify if:
- No current severe psychological disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Psychology
Valencia, 46010, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marisol Lila, PhD
University of Valencia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2019
First Posted
March 21, 2019
Study Start
March 4, 2019
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share