NCT03882359

Brief Summary

Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres, Lantheus Medical Imaging) is an ultrasound contrast indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border. MVT-100 (the investigational pharmaceutical) is similar to Definity, with the exception of the removal of one lipid in the lipid blend and substitution of another lipid. This study is intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MVT-100 using a single ascending dose design in healthy volunteers. Patients are randomized to receive either MVT-100 or Definity and undergo echocardiograms after receiving either MVT-100 or Definity via bolus or IV infusion administration. The primary endpoints evaluated are safety and endocardial border delineation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 25, 2019

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 9, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

echoechocardiogramHealthy VolunteersDefinity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • QT Interval

    The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

    Day of study

  • Blood Pressure

    The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

    Day of study

  • Heart Rate

    The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

    Day of study

  • Oxygen Saturation

    The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

    Day of study

  • Other Symptoms

    The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)

    Day of study

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO)

    Day of Study

  • Cardiac Segment Visualization

    Day of Study

Study Arms (2)

Definity

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of DEFINITY® 100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.

Diagnostic Test: EchocardiogramDrug: Definity

MVT-100

EXPERIMENTAL

Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of MVT-100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.

Diagnostic Test: EchocardiogramDrug: MVT-100

Interventions

EchocardiogramDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (\<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (\<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (\<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (\<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3.

DefinityMVT-100

After randomization, MVT-100, the experimental drug, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.

MVT-100

After randomization, Definity, the active comparator, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.

Definity

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult subjects 19 years of age or older, male or female
  • Female subjects must no longer have child-bearing potential (\>1-year post menopause or surgically sterilized), or must
  • have a negative urine pregnancy test, and
  • be using and continue to use for 30 days after the study a medically effective method of contraception
  • Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, as defined by:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
  • Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L
  • Plasma creatinine\< 1.5 x ULN
  • Total bilirubin within normal limits (\< 2.5 x ULN if Gilbert's syndrome)
  • Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) \< 2.5 x ULN
  • Subject must be willing and able to understand the study and provide written Informed Consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Myocardial infarction within six months prior to enrollment
  • Unstable angina, NYHA Class II or greater congestive heart failure
  • EKG evidence of uncontrolled arrhythmia or history of clinically significant arrhythmia within the past six months
  • Clinically significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or other pulmonary condition that is not controlled by medication or requires oxygen frequently or continuously
  • A history of pulmonary emboli
  • Known hypersensitivity to perflutren, DEFINITY® or other echo contrast agent
  • Inability to remain supine for 60 minutes
  • Oxygen saturation \< 95% on room air
  • History of allergic reaction attributed to compounds of similar chemical composition to MVT-100 or DEFINITY® or soy or egg allergies (see Investigator's Brochure)
  • Subject has received any investigational drug within thirty (30) days prior to enrollment into the study
  • Inability to comply with study procedures
  • Subjects with any medical condition deemed by the investigator to make the subject inappropriate for participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States

Location

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960.

    PMID: 22692172BACKGROUND
  • Platts DG, Luis SA, Roper D, Burstow D, Call T, Forshaw A, Pascoe R. The safety profile of perflutren microsphere contrast echocardiography during rest and stress imaging: results from an Australian multicentre cohort. Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Dec;22(12):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.637. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

    PMID: 23764145BACKGROUND
  • Weissman, Neil J., Warren J. Manning, and Brian C. Downey. Contrast echocardiography: clinical applications. Waltham, MA : UpToDate, 2013.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lantheus Medical Imaging. Definity Package Insert. Definity Imaging. [Online] http://www.definityimaging.com/pdf/DEFINITY_US_PI_515987-0117.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Sep;20(9):1021-41. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17765820BACKGROUND
  • Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25085408BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Diseases

Interventions

Echocardiographyperflutren

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisUltrasonographyHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The interpreter of echocardiograms in the trial is blinded to the drug which was administered, MVT-100 or Definity.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Ascending dose comparison in healthy volunteers
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2019

First Posted

March 20, 2019

Study Start

April 25, 2019

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

May 6, 2025

Last Updated

May 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations