A Feasibility Study of Virtopsy With Tissue Sampling in Besancon University Hospital
VIRTOPSY+
1 other identifier
observational
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this project is to assess the feasibility of a new local post mortem procedure at Besançon University Hospital : Virtopsy+, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with tissue sampling of the fetus and newborns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2020
CompletedOctober 5, 2020
October 1, 2020
1 year
March 14, 2019
October 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of virtopsy made completely
Number of virtopsy made completely (from death until clinical report).
month 12
Eligibility Criteria
* stillbirth and fetal deaths over 21 weeks of gestation * termination of pregnancy over 21 weeks of gestation * neonatal death
You may qualify if:
- stillbirth and fetal deaths over 21 weeks of gestation
- termination of pregnancy over 21 weeks of gestation
- neonatal death
- patient having read the letter of information and signed the consent.
You may not qualify if:
- legal incapacity
- limited ability to consent
- lack of parental consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Besancon
Besançon, 25030, France
Related Publications (10)
Addison S, Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S. Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. Br J Radiol. 2014 Apr;87(1036):20130621. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130621.
PMID: 24288400BACKGROUNDBrookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet. 1996 Oct 26;348(9035):1139-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02287-8.
PMID: 8888168BACKGROUNDBreeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Cross JJ, Lomas DJ, Hackett GA, Joubert I, Lees CC. Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;37(3):317-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.8844.
PMID: 20878677BACKGROUNDKang X, Cannie MM, Arthurs OJ, Segers V, Fourneau C, Bevilacqua E, Cos Sanchez T, Sebire NJ, Jani JC. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3542-3553. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4725-4. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
PMID: 28116518BACKGROUNDCannie M, Votino C, Moerman P, Vanheste R, Segers V, Van Berkel K, Hanssens M, Kang X, Cos T, Kir M, Balepa L, Divano L, Foulon W, De Mey J, Jani J. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;39(6):659-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.10079. Epub 2012 May 22.
PMID: 21919100BACKGROUNDGriffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH. Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet. 2005 Apr 2-8;365(9466):1271-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74816-9.
PMID: 15811461BACKGROUNDSebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S, Mushtaq I, Taylor A, Chitty LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination ("keyhole autopsy"): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 May;25(5):513-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.601368. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PMID: 21740313BACKGROUNDWoodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, Kennedy A. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jan;168(1):41-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976917.
PMID: 8976917BACKGROUNDThayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah A, Saunders DE, Owens CM, Chong WK, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol). BMC Pediatr. 2011 Dec 22;11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-120.
PMID: 22192497BACKGROUNDD'Hondt A, Cassart M, De Maubeuge R, Soto Ares G, Rommens J, Avni EF. Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? Insights Imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):591-598. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PMID: 29869137BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marion AUBER LENOIR, MD
CHU Besançon
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2019
First Posted
March 18, 2019
Study Start
February 28, 2019
Primary Completion
March 6, 2020
Study Completion
March 6, 2020
Last Updated
October 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share