NCT03870789

Brief Summary

Given the implementation of the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) and the use of capnography by paramedics, this study will involve a large multi-site retrospective evaluation (before vs after implementation) of the HEWS score and comparison of the HEWS to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis Related Organ failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) when applied retrospectively for the identification of sepsis in the prehospital setting.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 11, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 8, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 8, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

sepsis, septic shock, early warning scores, infecion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of HEWS

    To determine the accuracy of the HEWS score, compared to qSOFA, and SIRS for early sepsis recognition when used in the prehospital setting by paramedics for the identification of patients with sepsis or suspected sepsis.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Evaluate the addtion of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) values

    1 year

  • Evaluate sepsis alert program

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Retrospective

The Investigators will examine data from 1-year prior to paramedic implementation of the Hamilton Early Warning Score tool.

Prospective

The Investigators will examine data from 1-year after paramedic implementation of the Hamilton Early Warning Score tool.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults with suspected infection.

You may qualify if:

  • Any patient to which paramedics apply the Hamilton Early Warning Score or patients who arrive to the Emergency Department (ED) by ambulance without a pre-alert and meet the definition of sepsis in the ED will also be included, and patient is ≥ 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is an inter-facility transfer, or patients with absent vital signs are absent, or death before blood can be drawn in the Emergency Department, or the patient fits the criteria for another prehospital alert (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular vascular accident, or trauma)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Paramedic Education and Research, Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, L8E 5E3, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

    PMID: 26903338BACKGROUND
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. In Focus: A National Look at Sepsis.; 2009. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HSMR_Sepsis2009_e.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002.

    PMID: 11445675BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, Septic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Study Officials

  • Michelle Wellsford, MD

    Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Natasha Clayton, CRA, RA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2019

First Posted

March 12, 2019

Study Start

December 11, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

March 12, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations