Implementation of Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders.
IFIP
Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
460
1 country
15
Brief Summary
This study will develop and evaluate a complex intervention to implement guidelines on family involvement for patients with psychotic disorders (F20-29 in International Classification of Diseases ICD-10) in community mental health centres, by using a cluster randomised design. Fifteen Norwegian outpatient units participate in the study, and each of them constitutes a single cluster, except for two collaborating clinics who are considered one cluster. Of the fourteen clusters, half will receive implementation support and training immediately, whereas the other half will receive it one and a half year later. The study will assess both service level outcomes, by measuring fidelity scores, and selected outcomes for patients and relatives, by collecting questionnaires and data from central health registers and patient records. In addition, qualitative interviews will be performed with patients, relatives and health care personnel. The study will also include a cost-effectiveness analysis and a political economy analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2022
CompletedJanuary 4, 2023
January 1, 2023
2.7 years
February 28, 2019
January 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Implementation study: Fidelity to the intervention model - Family psychoeducation 1
Change in score on fidelity scale for performance and content of family psychoeducation. Rated from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months in the intervention arm. Baseline and 18 months in the control arm.
Implementation study: Fidelity to the intervention model - Family psychoeducation 2
Change in score on fidelity scale for penetration rate and general organisation of family psychoeducation. Rated from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months in the intervention arm. Baseline and 18 months in the control arm.
Implementation study: Fidelity to the intervention model - Family involvement and support 1
Change in total fidelity measured by the fidelity scale for family involvement and support. Rated from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months in the intervention arm. Baseline and 18 months in the control arm.
Implementation study: Fidelity to the intervention model - Family involvement and support 2
Change in penetration rate, measured by the fidelity scale for family involvement and support. Rated from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months in the intervention arm. Baseline and 18 months in the control arm.
Implementation study: Fidelity to the intervention model - Family involvement and support 3
Change in content, structure and implementation, measured by the scale for family involvement and support. Rated from 1 (low) to 5 (high).
Baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months in the intervention arm. Baseline and 18 months in the control arm.
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Patient quantitative sub-study: Patient experiences of their own mental health and functioning.
0, 6 and 12 months.
Patient quantitative sub-study and economic sub-study: Quality of life
0, 6 and 12 months.
Patient quantitative sub-study: General satisfaction.
0, 6 and 12 months.
Patient quantitative sub-study: Experienced burden of mental health problems.
0, 6 and 12 months.
Patient quantitative sub-study: Perceived warmth and criticism from relative.
0, 6 and 12 months.
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Patient quantitative sub-study: Alcohol abuse
0 months - baseline screening only
Patient quantitative sub-study: Drug abuse
0 months - baseline screening only
Patient quantitative sub-study and implementation study: Exposure to family psychoeducation.
Baseline screening, then 6 and 12 months
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention arm
OTHERClusters (psychiatric outpatient clinics) in the intervention arm receives a comprehensive implementation support program during the trial period.
Control arm
NO INTERVENTIONClusters (psychiatric outpatient clinics) in the control arm receives no implementation support during the trial period.
Interventions
The IFIP intervention consists of the following elements: I. Clinical interventions 1.1 A basic level of family involvement and support 1.2 Family psychoeducation in single-family groups II. Implementation interventions 2.1 Training and guidance of health care personnel 2.2 A family coordinator 2.3 Other implementation measures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To have an established psychotic disorder (F20-29 in ICD-10) or a tentative diagnosis of psychotic disorder, certain enough to begin treatment. This need not be the patient's primary diagnosis.
You may not qualify if:
- To be sentenced to psychiatric treatment.
- Not being competent to consent to participation in research.
- Having completed more than five joint sessions of family psychoeducation in single-family groups (patient and relative together) or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
- Not having any relatives or next of kin.
- Being a relative of a patient with a diagnosis as described above.
- Having completed more than five joint sessions (patient and relative together) of family psychoeducation in single-family groups or more than ten joint sessions (multiple families together) in multiple-family groups, or a similarly structured family intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oslolead
- Oslo Metropolitan Universitycollaborator
- University Hospital, Akershuscollaborator
- Helse Fonnacollaborator
- Diakonhjemmet Hospitalcollaborator
- Vestre Viken Hospital Trustcollaborator
- Oslo University Hospitalcollaborator
- Sykehuset i Vestfold HFcollaborator
- Sykehuset Telemarkcollaborator
- The Research Council of Norwaycollaborator
- Helse Sor-Ostcollaborator
Study Sites (15)
Asker DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Asker, Norway
Drammen DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Drammen, Norway
Ringerike DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Hønefoss, Norway
Kongsberg DPS - Vestre Viken HF
Kongsberg, Norway
DPS poliklinikk Vestmar/stathelle - Sykehuset Telemark
Kragerø, Norway
Vestfold DPS - Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Larvik, Norway
Nedre Romerike DPS - Akershus Universitetssykehus HF
Lillestrøm, Norway
Groruddalen DPS - Akershus Universitetssykehus HF
Oslo, Norway
Søndre Oslo DPS - Oslo Universitetssykehus HF
Oslo, Norway
Voksenpsykiatrisk avdeling Vinderen - Diakonhjemmet Sykehus
Oslo, Norway
DPS poliklinikk Porsgrunn - Sykehuset Telemark
Porsgrunn, Norway
Bærum DPS -Vestre Viken HF
Sandvika, Norway
DPS poliklinikk Seljord - Sykehuset Telemark
Seljord, Norway
DPS poliklinikk Skien - Sykehuset Telemark
Skien, Norway
Vestfold DPS - Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Tønsberg, Norway
Related Publications (28)
Eisen SV, Normand SL, Belanger AJ, Spiro A 3rd, Esch D. The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): reliability and validity. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1230-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010.
PMID: 15550803BACKGROUNDKeetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Taylor Buck E, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T, Barkham M. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10.
PMID: 29433611BACKGROUNDElwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
PMID: 23768763BACKGROUNDPriebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999 Spring;45(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/002076409904500102.
PMID: 10443245BACKGROUNDSzmukler GI, Burgess P, Herrman H, Benson A, Colusa S, Bloch S. Caring for relatives with serious mental illness: the development of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;31(3-4):137-48. doi: 10.1007/BF00785760.
PMID: 8766459BACKGROUNDBrouwer WB, van Exel NJ, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006 Aug;15(6):1005-21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-5994-6.
PMID: 16900281BACKGROUNDWiedemann G, Rayki O, Feinstein E, Hahlweg K. The Family Questionnaire: development and validation of a new self-report scale for assessing expressed emotion. Psychiatry Res. 2002 Apr 15;109(3):265-79. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00023-9.
PMID: 11959363BACKGROUNDQuirk, A., Smith, S., Hamilton, S., Lamping, D., Lelliot, P., Stahl, D., Pinfold, V & Andiappan, M. (2012). Development of the carer well-being and support (CWS) questionnaire. Mental Health Review Journal 17:128-38.doi:10.1108/13619321211287184
BACKGROUNDWing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172:11-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.1.11.
PMID: 9534825BACKGROUNDBerman AH, Bergman H, Palmstierna T, Schlyter F. Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(1):22-31. doi: 10.1159/000081413.
PMID: 15608468BACKGROUNDSaunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
PMID: 8329970BACKGROUNDKarterud S, Pedersen G, Løvdal H, Friis S. S-GAF: Global Funsjonsskåring - Splittet Versjon [Global Assessment of Functioning - Split version]. Bakgrunn og skåringsveiledning. Klinikk for psykiatri, Ullevål sykehus, Oslo, 1998.
BACKGROUNDHooley JM, Teasdale JD. Predictors of relapse in unipolar depressives: expressed emotion, marital distress, and perceived criticism. J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):229-35. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.3.229.
PMID: 2768657BACKGROUNDPharoah F, Mari J, Rathbone J, Wong W. Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;(12):CD000088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub2.
PMID: 21154340BACKGROUNDYesufu-Udechuku A, Harrison B, Mayo-Wilson E, Young N, Woodhams P, Shiers D, Kuipers E, Kendall T. Interventions to improve the experience of caring for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):268-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147561.
PMID: 25833867BACKGROUNDHelsedirektoratet. (2013). Utredning, behandling og oppfølging av personer med psykoselidelser. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from https://helsedirektoratet.no/Lists/Publikasjoner/Attachments/326/Nasjonal-faglig-retningslinje-for-utredning-behandling-og-oppfolging-av-personer-med-psykoselidelser-IS-1957.pdf.
BACKGROUNDHelsedirektoratet. (2017). Veileder om pårørende i helse- og omsorgstjenesten. Retrieved March 22, 2018, from https://helsedirektoratet.no/Retningslinjer/Pårørendeveileder.pdf
BACKGROUNDMcHugo GJ, Drake RE, Whitley R, Bond GR, Campbell K, Rapp CA, Goldman HH, Lutz WJ, Finnerty MT. Fidelity outcomes in the National Implementing Evidence-Based Practices Project. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.10.1279.
PMID: 17914003BACKGROUNDVermeulen, B., Lauwers, H., Spruytte, N., Van Audenhove, C., Magro, C., Saunders, J. & Jones, K. (2015). Experiences of family caregivers for persons with severe mental illness: an international exploration. Leuven: LUCAS KU Leuven/EUFAMI.
BACKGROUNDTorrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, Burns BJ, Flynn L, Rush AJ, Clark RE, Klatzker D. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jan;52(1):45-50. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.45.
PMID: 11141527BACKGROUNDCampbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
PMID: 22951546BACKGROUNDNorheim I, Pedersen R, Selle ML, Rossberg JI, Hestmark L, Heiervang KS, Ruud T, Asholt VM, Hansson KM, Moller P, Fosse R, Kjus SHH, Romoren M. Effectiveness of implementing family involvement on patient outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Dec 4;25(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07501-z.
PMID: 41345598DERIVEDNorheim I, Pedersen R, Selle ML, Rossberg JI, Hestmark L, Heiervang KS, Ruud T, Asholt VM, Hansson KM, Moller P, Fosse R, Romoren M. Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives' outcomes and family interventions received. Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 24;15:1381007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1381007. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38855639DERIVEDHestmark L, Romoren M, Heiervang KS, Hansson KM, Ruud T, Saltyte Benth J, Norheim I, Weimand B, Pedersen R. Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 May;50(3):520-533. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01255-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
PMID: 36797515DERIVEDHansson KM, Romoren M, Weimand B, Heiervang KS, Hestmark L, Landeweer EGM, Pedersen R. The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6.
PMID: 36539741DERIVEDHansson KM, Romoren M, Pedersen R, Weimand B, Hestmark L, Norheim I, Ruud T, Hymer IS, Heiervang KS. Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 12;22(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08489-y.
PMID: 36096844DERIVEDHestmark L, Heiervang KS, Pedersen R, Hansson KM, Ruud T, Romoren M. Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a cross-sectional fidelity-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03300-4.
PMID: 34078306DERIVEDHestmark L, Romoren M, Heiervang KS, Weimand B, Ruud T, Norvoll R, Hansson KM, Norheim I, Aas E, Landeweer EGM, Pedersen R. Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 9;20(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05792-4.
PMID: 33036605DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Reidar Pedersen, PhD
Professor and head of department, Centre for medical ethics,University of Oslo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patients and relatives will not be informed about their outpatient clinic's allocation status. However, they may deduce this from the kind of treatment they receive. It's impossible to blind the care providers and for practical reasons we won't be able to blind the investigators or the outcomes assessors.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2019
First Posted
March 11, 2019
Study Start
March 21, 2019
Primary Completion
November 30, 2021
Study Completion
May 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share