NCT03863613

Brief Summary

This study compares the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and a cervix ≤28 mm. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
219

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 28, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2019

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 23, 2019

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 8, 2023

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 29, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

February 28, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Pessary, Cerclage, Progesterone, Twins, Preterm birth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Preterm birth <34 weeks

    Birth before 34 weeks' gestation

    From date of randomisation until 33 6/7 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (37)

  • Gestational age at delivery

    At birth

  • Time from randomisation to delivery

    From date of randomisation until the date of delivery, assessed up to 22 weeks

  • Preterm birth <28 weeks

    From date of randomisation until 27 6/7 weeks

  • Preterm birth <37 weeks

    From date of randomisation until 36 6/7 weeks

  • Spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks

    From date of randomisation until 27 6/7 weeks

  • +32 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Pessary group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A soft, flexible, silicone pessary, purchased from the manufacturer (Arabin®, Dr Arabin GmbH \& Co KG, Germany) will be inserted through the vagina, upward around the cervix by 4 senior clinicians, who had experienced with pessary used, within one week of randomisation. Size of the pessary will be determined at the time of speculum inspection.

Device: Pessary

Cerclage group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women will be receiving the cervical cerclage according to local protocol, within a week after randomisation. 3 senior clinicians who had experienced with cerclage, will perform cerclage, using Mc Donald technique, under spinal anaesthesia.

Procedure: Cervical cerclage

Pessary plus progesterone group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

400 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 400mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), will be applied once daily at bedtime, starting from the day of randomisation, in addition to the pessary that has been placed. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.

Device: PessaryDrug: Vaginal progesterone

Cerclage plus progesterone group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

400 mg vaginal progesterone, purchased from the manufacturer (Cyclogest® 400mg, Actavis, United Kingdom), will be applied once daily at bedtime, starting from the day of randomisation, in addition to the cerclage that has been placed. Participants will be asked to record their drug application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.

Procedure: Cervical cerclageDrug: Vaginal progesterone

Interventions

PessaryDEVICE

A soft, flexible, silicone pessary (Arabin®, Dr Arabin GmbH \& Co KG, Germany) will be inserted through the vagina, upward around the cervix.

Also known as: Arabin
Pessary groupPessary plus progesterone group

Cervical cerclage using Mc Donald technique, under anaesthesia

Also known as: Stitch
Cerclage groupCerclage plus progesterone group

Cyclogest® 400mg, Actavis, United Kingdom, applied once daily at bedtime

Also known as: Cyclogest 200 mg
Cerclage plus progesterone groupPessary plus progesterone group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with a twin pregnancy (mono- and di-chorionic)
  • /7 to 22 0/7 weeks of gestation
  • Maternal age ≥18 yrs
  • Cervical length ≤28 mm
  • Informed consent
  • Not participating in another preterm birth study at the same time

You may not qualify if:

  • Uterine anomalies
  • Cervical dilation with visible amniotic membranes or amniotic membranes prolapsed into the vagina
  • Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
  • Stillbirth or major congenital abnormalities in any of the fetus
  • Severe vaginal discharge
  • Acute vaginitis or cervicitis
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Placental preavia
  • Vasa preavia
  • Premature rupture of membranes
  • Premature labor with/without ruptured membrane
  • Suspicion of chorioamnionitis
  • Cerclage or pessary in place or unable to undergo cervical cerclage or pessary

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital

Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • He YTN, Pham HNH, Nguyen TC, Bui TQ, Vuong NT, Nguyen DTN, Le TV, Li W, Le CH, Ho TM, Mol BW, Dang VQ, Vuong LN. Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 21;22(2):e1004526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004526. eCollection 2025 Feb.

  • Dang VQ, He YT, Pham HN, Trieu TT, Bui TQ, Vuong NT, Nguyen LM, Nguyen DT, Le TV, Li W, Le CH, Mol BW, Vuong LN. Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e036587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature Birth

Interventions

PessariesCerclage, CervicalProgesterone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical EquipmentEquipment and SuppliesObstetric Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePregnenedionesPregnenesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsCorpus Luteum HormonesGonadal HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsProgesterone CongenersGonadal Steroid Hormones

Study Officials

  • Yen TN He, MD

    My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Participants will be randomised to either cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone in a 1:1:1:1 ratio with a variable block size of 4 or 8.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2019

First Posted

March 5, 2019

Study Start

March 23, 2019

Primary Completion

July 8, 2023

Study Completion

July 29, 2023

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) and study protocol will be available, upon request from investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Data will be available at the beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication. Proposals should be directed to bsvinh.dq@myduchospital.vn. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at https://www.project-redcap.org/

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be available at the beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
Access Criteria
To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at https://www.project-redcap.org/.
More information

Locations