Experiences With Automated Surgical Drainage in Cardiac Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Thoraguard Surgical Drainage System in a real-world clinical environment. It is believed that this system will offer functional and clinical benefits over the current standard of care system for the removal of surgical fluids following cardiac surgery. Observations, experiences, and outcomes in a single hospital setting will be collected for the Thoraguard Surgical Drainage System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 17, 2020
July 1, 2020
1.1 years
February 27, 2019
July 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Device User Experience Survey
The Device User Experience Survey is an unvalidated, Sponsor-generated questionnaire aimed to increase the Sponsor's understanding of the usability of the Thoraguard Surgical Drainage System. The questionnaire asks approximately 15 questions (includes yes/no responses, rating scales, and fill-in-the-blank sections) and is to be completed by the treating clinicians at the completion of the study. A summary of all treating clinician responses will be generated at the completion of the study to summarize the overall user experience with the device.
At study completion - approximate 6 months.
Study Arms (1)
Treatment Group
Patients selected to participate.
Interventions
Blood drainage post cardiac surgery with Thoraguard Surgical Drainage System.
Eligibility Criteria
Non-emergent cardiac surgery patients undergoing one of the following procedures: coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve repair or replacement, mitral valve repair or replacement, ascending aortic surgery, a combination of these procedures, or in conjunction with additional procedures such as left ventricular aneurysm repair.
You may qualify if:
- Adult (age ≥ 18)
- Patient undergoing non-emergent cardiac surgery
- Anticipated requirement for mediastinal chest tube drainage
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Re-do surgery
- Prior cardiac surgery
- Congenital cardiac disease or deformation
- Transplant surgery
- Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
- Suspected pulmonary air leak
- Atrial fibrillation
- In the opinion of the investigator the patient is unsuitable for the study for any other legitimate reason including incarceration, pre-existing medical or psychiatric condition, or interfering medications
- Known previous or concurrent enrollment in a clinical trial that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the objectives of this clinical trial
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centese, Inc.lead
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (5)
Karimov JH, Gillinov AM, Schenck L, Cook M, Kosty Sweeney D, Boyle EM, Fukamachi K. Incidence of chest tube clogging after cardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective observational study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Dec;44(6):1029-36. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt140. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
PMID: 23520232BACKGROUNDBalzer F, von Heymann C, Boyle EM, Wernecke KD, Grubitzsch H, Sander M. Impact of retained blood requiring reintervention on outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;152(2):595-601.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.086. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PMID: 27210474BACKGROUNDHalm MA. To strip or not to strip? Physiological effects of chest tube manipulation. Am J Crit Care. 2007 Nov;16(6):609-12. No abstract available.
PMID: 17962505BACKGROUNDMahmood K, Wahidi MM. Straightening out chest tubes: what size, what type, and when. Clin Chest Med. 2013 Mar;34(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
PMID: 23411057BACKGROUNDShalli S, Saeed D, Fukamachi K, Gillinov AM, Cohn WE, Perrault LP, Boyle EM. Chest tube selection in cardiac and thoracic surgery: a survey of chest tube-related complications and their management. J Card Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):503-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00905.x.
PMID: 19740284BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jack Boyd, MD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
February 22, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
May 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share