Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Shockwave Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
CAST-HF
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomised, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cardiac Shockwave Therapy (CAST-HF) in patients with ischaemic heart failure requiring surgical revascularization. The main questions to answer are:
- Does cardiac shockwave therapy, in addition to CABG surgery, improve left ventricular ejection fraction?
- Is cardiac shockwave therapy in addition to CAGB surgery safe? Participants will be randomised into intervention (cardiac shockwave therapy) and control (sham treatment with an inactive applicator) groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2023
CompletedOctober 19, 2023
November 1, 2022
3.5 years
November 8, 2018
October 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The primary efficacy endpoint is the improvement in LVEF measured by cardiac MRI from baseline to 360 days.
The primary efficacy objective is to assess the efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting and suffering from reduced left ventricular function ≤ 40%
360 days
The primary safety endpoint is the occurrence of device-related complications (adverse device effects or serious adverse device effects) within 360 days.
The primary safety objective is to assess the safety profile of the cardiac shock wave therapy device.
360 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Secondary efficacy-related endpoints include patient-reported outcomes.
360 days
Secondary safety-related endpoints include patient-reported outcomes.
6 Days
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the intervention arm, 300 shockwave impulses per coronary supply territory, at an energy flux density of 0.38mJ/mm2 and a frequency 3Hz, are applied in direct contact with the ischaemic myocardium of the left ventricle. The intervention is performed during CABG surgery after bypasses are fully established while still on cardiopulmonary bypass.
Sham Control Arm
NO INTERVENTIONIn the sham control arm, the same manipulations are performed with an inactive shockwave applicator in direct contact with the ischaemic myocardium of the left ventricle as in the intervention arm. The sham treatment is performed during CABG surgery after bypasses are fully established while still on cardiopulmonary bypass.
Interventions
The cardiac shockwave system consists of a table-top device (Nonvasiv Medical GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) and a sterile single-use applicator releasing electrohydraulic shockwaves (Heart Regeneration Technologies GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). Prior to use, the applicator is inserted into a sterile cover containing ultrasound gel. In order to ensure acoustic coupling between the applicator and the myocardium, continuous saline rinsing is applied throughout the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients between 21 and 90 years of age undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting
- Presentation with reduced left ventricular function, defined as LVEF ≤ 40% measured by cardiac MRI
- Presentation with regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities
- Written informed consent from the patient for participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Significant concomitant aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment (other than significant aortic valve disease not detected in preoperative cardiac ultrasound but detected during surgery)
- Serious radiographic contrast allergy
- Patient in cardiogenic shock or presenting with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI)
- Patient with a contraindication for cardiac MRI
- History of significant ventricular arrhythmia, other than MI-associated arrhythmia
- Comorbidity reducing life expectancy to less than one year
- Presence of a ventricular thrombus
- Presence of a cardiac tumour
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Innsbruck - Competence Center for Clinical Trials
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Related Publications (2)
Nagele F, Polzl L, Graber M, Hirsch J, Mayr A, Pamminger M, Troger F, Theurl M, Schreinlechner M, Sappler N, Dorfmuller C, Mitrovic M, Ulmer H, Grimm M, Gollmann-Tepekoylu C, Holfeld J. Safety and efficacy of direct cardiac shockwave therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (the CAST-HF trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial-an update. Trials. 2022 Dec 9;23(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06931-4.
PMID: 36494706DERIVEDPolzl L, Nagele F, Graber M, Hirsch J, Lobenwein D, Mitrovic M, Mayr A, Theurl M, Schreinlechner M, Pamminger M, Dorfmuller C, Grimm M, Gollmann-Tepekoylu C, Holfeld J. Safety and efficacy of direct Cardiac Shockwave Therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (the CAST-HF trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 May 30;21(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04369-0.
PMID: 32473644DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johannes Holfeld, MD
University Hospital for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The masking is performed using opaque envelopes that are opened by an assistant at the end of the CABG procedure after the bypasses are fully established.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2018
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
November 16, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
March 15, 2023
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-11