Comparison of PHVP of Different VTH Methods
Comparison of the Vault Prolapse Rate After Vaginal Hysterectomy With or Without Residual Uterine Ligament Ligation
Comparison of the Vault Prolapse Rate After Vaginal Hysterectomy With or Without Residual Uterine Ligament Ligation
Sponsor study identifier
observational
213
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
January 1, 1986
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 31, 2001
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)To evaluate the post-hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) rates performed using different methods of vaginal total hysterectomy (VTH).
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 1, 1986
Actual (reported)December 31, 2001
Actual (reported)December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)February 26, 2019
Actual (reported)March 1, 2019
Actual (reported)Post-hysterectomy vault prolapse
PHVP was defined as more than or equal to the second stage of descent of the vaginal vault was noted during the follow-up visits.
Between January 1986 and December 2001
VTH via the Tsuzi method with residual uterine ligament ligation (ligations group)
Traditional VTH without residual uterine ligament ligation (without ligations group)
VTH via the Tsuzi method with residual uterine ligament ligation
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Between January 1986 and December 2001, all women who received VTH with or without other combined operations at National Taiwan University Hospital were recruited. In September 2016, a retrospective chart review was performed.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
Buca DIP, Liberati M, Falo E, Leombroni M, Di Giminiani M, Di Nicola M, Santarelli A, Frondaroli F, Fanfani F. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse with Elevate Prolapse Repair System. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):854-859. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1419462. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
Ho-Hsiung Lin, PhD
National Taiwan University Hospital
213 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 26, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 1986
Actual (reported)Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Ker CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS, Long CY. Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8.
Chang TC, Hsiao SM, Chen CH, Wu WY, Lin HH. Clinical Outcomes and Urodynamic Effects of Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:191258. doi: 10.1155/2015/191258. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
Chen CH, Hsiao SM, Chang TC, Wu WY, Lin HH. Transvaginal cystocele repair using pursestring technique reinforced with custom-tailored two-armed mesh. Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1380. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Primary Completion
December 31, 2001
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: