Comparison of PHVP of Different VTH Methods
Comparison of the Vault Prolapse Rate After Vaginal Hysterectomy With or Without Residual Uterine Ligament Ligation
1 other identifier
observational
213
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To evaluate the post-hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) rates performed using different methods of vaginal total hysterectomy (VTH).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 1986
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1986
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 6, 2019
February 1, 2016
16 years
February 26, 2019
March 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-hysterectomy vault prolapse
PHVP was defined as more than or equal to the second stage of descent of the vaginal vault was noted during the follow-up visits.
Between January 1986 and December 2001
Study Arms (2)
Ligations group
VTH via the Tsuzi method with residual uterine ligament ligation (ligations group)
Without ligations group
Traditional VTH without residual uterine ligament ligation (without ligations group)
Interventions
VTH via the Tsuzi method with residual uterine ligament ligation
Eligibility Criteria
Between January 1986 and December 2001, all women who received VTH with or without other combined operations at National Taiwan University Hospital were recruited. In September 2016, a retrospective chart review was performed.
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Received VTH with or without other combined operations.
You may not qualify if:
- Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
- Conversion to an abdominal approach
- Unsatisfactory medical record
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
PMID: 19941278RESULTBuca DIP, Liberati M, Falo E, Leombroni M, Di Giminiani M, Di Nicola M, Santarelli A, Frondaroli F, Fanfani F. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse with Elevate Prolapse Repair System. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):854-859. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1419462. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
PMID: 29537324RESULTKer CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS, Long CY. Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8.
PMID: 29930249RESULTChang TC, Hsiao SM, Chen CH, Wu WY, Lin HH. Clinical Outcomes and Urodynamic Effects of Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:191258. doi: 10.1155/2015/191258. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
PMID: 26634203RESULTChen CH, Hsiao SM, Chang TC, Wu WY, Lin HH. Transvaginal cystocele repair using pursestring technique reinforced with custom-tailored two-armed mesh. Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1380. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
PMID: 21908027RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ho-Hsiung Lin, PhD
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 1986
Primary Completion
December 31, 2001
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share