NCT03857386

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of PECS block applied to patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction surgery on postoperative analgesia compared to local infiltration anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2017

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

December 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

pectoral nerve block (PECS block)breast reduction surgeryultrasonographypostoperative painVAS score

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score

    Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (VAS 0 = no pain, VAS 10 = most severe pain possible). The VAS scores will be recorded at postoperative 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours.

    postoperative 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • analgesia consumption

    12 hours

  • length of hospital

    4 days

  • analgesia consumption

    during the surgery

Study Arms (2)

PECS group

Preoperative bilateral PECS I + PECS II Pecs block performed by anaesthetist using ultrasound guidance in plane approach

Procedure: PECS group

Control group

Bilateral local anesthesia infiltration Local infiltration anesthesia performed by surgeon during the operation

Procedure: Control group

Interventions

PECS groupPROCEDURE

Pecs block performed using ultrasound guidance

Also known as: Regional anesthesia in breast surgery
PECS group
Control groupPROCEDURE

Local infiltration anesthesia performed during the operation

Also known as: Regional anesthesia in breast surgery
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study included patients with ASA I-II, 18-65 years old, with a BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2 and undergoing elective breast reduction operation under general anesthesia.

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II
  • body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2
  • elective bilateral breast reduction surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • declining to give written informed consent
  • ASA III and above
  • under 18 years of age or over 65 years of age
  • history of allergy against to the local anesthetics,
  • controendication of peripheral block or local anesthetic infiltration (local infection, coagulopathy, etc.)
  • history of breast surgery
  • treatment due to psychiatric disorder
  • history of treatment for a chronic pain
  • history of nerve blocks in order to treat postoperative pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Antalya, 07100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

    PMID: 22939099BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Anesthesia, ConductionControl Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaEpidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Arzu Karaveli

    Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
study director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2018

First Posted

February 28, 2019

Study Start

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

May 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 30, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations