The Training and Evaluate Effect on Clinical Airway Management
1 other identifier
interventional
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this self-control experiment, anesthesiologists with limited experiments of bronchoscopy working in anesthesiology department in Peking Union Medical College Hospital will receive a training and evaluation procedure in simulation and clinical practice about clinical airway management. The objects was (1) to investigate the improvements of manufacturing bronchoscopy in simulation and clinical practise before and after training on simulation,(2) to record the efforts trainees needed to achieve experienced on simulation, (3) to evaluate if status manufacturing on simulations could reflect the ones in clinical practise.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 2, 2020
CompletedMarch 6, 2019
March 1, 2019
3 months
February 14, 2019
March 4, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change of Time needed.
Change of time needed to navigate using bronchoscopy.
Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Change of modified global rating scores (GRS).
Change of modified global rating scores (GRS) rating manufacturing skills using bronchoscopy. Total score ranges from 4 to 20 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score matches better skill. Total score is the submission of four subscales, which evaluating central view, mucosal contact, progress and orientation using bronchoscopy, ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score interval, higher scores represent better outcome.
Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Change of Likert score.
Change of Likert score evaluating self-confidence using bronchoscopy. Likert score ranges from 1 to 5 scores at 1-score intervals, higher score with more self-confidence.
Changes from baseline after finishing simulate training, an average of 1 month.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Inconsistency of evaluation of time needed between simulate and clinical practice.
At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.
Inconsistency of evaluation of modified global rating scores (GRS) between simulate and clinical practice.
At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.
Inconsistency of evaluation of Likert score between simulate and clinical practice.
At the beginning and after finishing the training, an average of 1 month.
Other Outcomes (2)
Efforts needed on simulate.
An average of 6 hours, since begin of simulate training.
Efforts needed on simulate.
An average of 6 hours, since begin of simulate training.
Study Arms (1)
anesthesiologist with limited experiment
EXPERIMENTALAnesthesiologists with limited experiment of bronchoscopy.
Interventions
Using the simulate device, the trainees are going to trained and evaluated the ability of driving bronchoscopy in simulate device and clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- An anesthesiologist who is working on anesthesia airway management；
- During the research period, he/she worked in the anesthesiology department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital；
- Have some experience in airway management，Meet at least one of the following conditions: ①Airway management experience ≤10 cases；②Objective GRS score \<3 points；③Subjective Likert score \<3 points
You may not qualify if:
- Cannot complete pre-training assessment；
- Cannot complete the training course；
- Cannot complete the post-training evaluation；
- Clinical airway managers were not performed during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chunhua Yu, Doctor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2019
First Posted
February 26, 2019
Study Start
March 5, 2019
Primary Completion
May 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 2, 2020
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03