NCT03853213

Brief Summary

The primary goal of this project is to identify, measure, and influence fear of cardiac event recurrence, a candidate mechanism of change in medication adherence in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). An intervention will be tested that has been used to reduce fear of cancer recurrence by changing emotion-related patterns of attention allocation and interpretation of neutral stimuli. Secondarily, the study will test whether a reduction in fear of cardiac event recurrence improves medication adherence.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 28, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 26, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

September 17, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2019

Results QC Date

June 30, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Fear of RecurrenceAcute Coronary SyndromeInterventionCognitive Bias Modification TrainingAttentional BiasInterpretation BiasMedication Adherence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Total Score for Concerns About Recurrence Scale [Adapted for Acute Coronary Syndrome]

    This 19-item self-report scale measures fear of recurrence of ACS events. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4). It has three subscales: health worries (items 1-11; subscale range: 0-44), role worries (items 12-17: subscale range: 0-24), and death worries (items 18-19: subscale range: 0-8). The total score is computed as the sum of all items in the scale (total score range: 0 to 76). Higher total scores indicate greater fear of recurrence. The study will test whether there is a larger Time-1-to-Time-2 reduction in Concerns about Recurrence total scores for the intervention group relative to the control group. The outcome for each group is computed as mean of the difference of the Time-2 score minus the Time-1 score. This is the sole primary outcome because the trial design was statistically powered to reduce FoR.

    Pre-Training/Time 1, Post-Training/Time 2 (approximately 4 weeks apart)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Total Score for Self-reported Extent of Nonadherence to Medication From the Extent of and Reasons for Nonadherence Scale [Adapted]

    Post-Training/Time 2 (approximately 4 weeks after Time 1)

  • Change in Total Score for the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in MET Minutes/Week

    Pre-Training/Time 1, Post-Training/Time 2 (approximately 4 weeks apart)

  • Change in Cue Presence Score for the Context Sensitivity Index

    Pre-Training/Time 1, Post-Training/Time 2 (approximately 4 weeks apart)

  • Change in Total Score for Future Time Perspective Scale

    Pre-Training/Time 1, Post-Training/Time 2 (approximately 4 weeks apart)

  • Percentage of Adherent Days to Medication (Aspirin, Beta-blocker, or Statin)

    Up to 2 months (starting after Pre-Training/Time 1 and extending for approximately 4 weeks after Post-Training/Time 2)

Study Arms (2)

Cognitive Bias Modification Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this intervention group complete two tasks, each repeated 8 times over the course of 4 weeks (twice per week). The first task is Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Attention. It is designed to reinforce attention away from ACS threat-related stimuli (e.g., "death," "chest pain") and toward neutral stimuli (e.g., "curve," barn doors"). The second task is Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Interpretation. It is designed to train participants to appraise ambiguous information that is potentially related to ACS threat as benign.

Behavioral: Cognitive Bias Modification Training

Attention Control Training

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants in this placebo control group complete two tasks, each repeated 8 times over the course of 4 weeks (twice per week). The first task is the placebo version of Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Attention. It is designed NOT to train attention toward or away from threatening or neutral information. The second task is the placebo version of Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Interpretation. It is designed NOT to train the interpretation of information as either threatening or benign.

Behavioral: Attention Control Training

Interventions

In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The letter appears in the neutral location on 90.6% of trials, thereby reinforcing participants' attending away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or phrase corresponding to a threatening (e.g., "dying") or benign (e.g., "sleep") interpretation of a sentence (e.g., "You have been waking up tired recently"). They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback ("Correct") is given for rejected threat interpretations and for benign interpretations. Otherwise, negative feedback ("Incorrect") is given.

Also known as: Cognitive-Affective Fear of Recurrence Intervention
Cognitive Bias Modification Training

In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The target letter is equally likely to appear in the threat location as the neutral location. Thus, participants' patterns of attention are not trained toward or away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or short phrase corresponding to either a threatening or benign interpretation of a sentence that follows it. They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback and negative feedback are equally likely to be given regardless of whether participants endorse the threatening or benign interpretations.

Attention Control Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older;
  • Fluent in English or Spanish;
  • A diagnosis of NSTEMI or unstable angina (UA) according to American College of Cardiology criteria;
  • Currently enrolled in the protocol titled "Testing biopsychosocial mechanisms of the posthospital syndrome \[PHS\] model of early rehospitalization in cardiac patients" (IRB-AAAR7350 at CUIMC)
  • Previously indicated "YES" to the following question in the consent form for the separate protocol (IRB-AAAR7350) in which they are enrolled and willing to be contacted about other future research projects.
  • Elevated Threat Perception score in emergency department flagged by automatic scoring (i.e., ≥ 10, the median for 1,000 ACS patients in a separate sample)
  • Currently on a daily aspirin regimen prescribed by a doctor OR currently on a daily beta-blocker or statin regimen prescribed by a doctor
  • Some comfort using technology such as electronic tablets or smartphones

You may not qualify if:

  • Deemed unable to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or by indicating during screening that s/he could not complete all requested tasks). This includes patients with a level of cognitive impairment indicative of dementia and patients with current alcohol or substance abuse;
  • Deemed to need immediate psychiatric intervention (that is, has to be hospitalized or have some other psychiatric intervention within 72 hours);
  • Unavailable for follow-up. This includes patients with a terminal noncardiovascular illness (life expectancy less than 1 year by physician report) and those who indicate they are about to leave the United States;
  • Underwent a surgical procedure within the past 24 hours and/or is scheduled for a surgical procedure within the next 24 hours.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Lopez-Veneros D, Cumella R, Kronish IM, Lazarov A, Birk JL. Home-based cognitive bias modification training for reducing maladaptive fear in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01442-2.

  • Birk JL, Cumella R, Lopez-Veneros D, Jurado A, Romero EK, Lazarov A, Kronish IM. Intervening on fear after acute cardiac events: Rationale and design of the INFORM randomized clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;39(9):736-744. doi: 10.1037/hea0000853.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary SyndromeMedication Adherence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesPatient CompliancePatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Limitations and Caveats

Because New York City was the original epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak in the US, the pandemic brought study enrollment to a halt in March 2020. Our potential pool of participants from the parent study also slowed due to the implementation of a new test (high sensitivity cardiac troponin assay) to diagnose ACS in the emergency department. Although beneficial for patient treatment, it reduced the number of patients enrolled in the parent study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jeffrey Birk
Organization
Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey L Birk, PhD

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Instructor in Medical Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2019

First Posted

February 25, 2019

Study Start

March 28, 2019

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

July 31, 2020

Last Updated

September 17, 2021

Results First Posted

July 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations