CryoBalloon Ablation for Treatment of Duodenal Adenomas
C2D2
Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation for Treatment of Sporadic and Familial Nonampullary Nonpolypoid Duodenal Adenomas (the C2D2 Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This multicenter prospective non-randomized interventional study (clinical trial) that will assess the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation treatment using the C2 Cryoballoon device (Pentax Medical Corporation) as an alternative primary treatment modality for sporadic and familial nonampullary nonpolypoid (flat) duodenal adenomas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 13, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
March 1, 2025
5.8 years
February 15, 2019
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Safety of cryoBalloon ablation in treating non-ampullary non-polypoid duodenal adenomas (DAs) as assessed by the incidence of adverse events in all treated patients
To assess incidence of treatment-related adverse events following cryoablation using the C2 cryoballoon system, defined by frequency or number of adverse events in all treated patients (per patient analysis).
5 years
Safety of cryoBalloon ablation in treating non-ampullary non-polypoid duodenal adenomas (DAs) as assessed by the incidence of adverse events in all treatment procedures
To assess incidence of treatment-related adverse events following cryoablation using the C2 cryoballoon system, defined by frequency or number of adverse events in all treatment procedures (per procedure analysis).
5 years
Complete eradication rate of DAs
Complete eradication (CE) rate of DAs as assessed by a combination of endoscopic and pathologic absence of adenomatous tissue in treated areas.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percent change in the treated duodenal adenoma size
Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Technical failure rate
5 years
Change in Spigelman class score
Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Progression rate to high grade dysplasia or duodenal cancer
5 years
Time to complete eradication of DAs in each patient
5 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with duodenal adenomas (DAs) and FAP with Spigelman class 2,3 or 4, treated with cryoballoon ablation (intervention)
Sporadic duodenal adenomas
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with at least 1 sporadic duodenal adenoma (DA) between 1-5 cm in maximum diameter, treated with cryoballoon ablation (intervention)
Interventions
Endoscopic cryoablation (cryogen is contained nitrous) using a CryoBalloon catheter to ablate up to 4 separate DA.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sporadic duodenal adenomas between 1 to 5 cm in widest diameter
- FAP patient with Spigelman class 2, 3 or 4 (see definition below)
- Polyp characteristics: Non-polypoid lesions Paris 2A and 2B, or
- Sessile adenomas, occupying no more than 50% circumference of duodenum, and no more than 3 duodenal folds
- Individuals must be considered high risk for surgery or endoscopic resection, due to complication risk, or declined standard therapies.
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected or proven duodenal carcinoma
- Paris 1p pedunculated, Paris 2c, or 3 lesions
- Paris 1s lesion \> 4 mm thick (estimated with closed biopsy forceps)
- Ampullary lesion or lesion involving the ampulla
- Prior failed ablative treatment with Argon Plasma Coagulation, laser, or cryotherapy
- Pre-existing esophageal, gastric, pyloric, or duodenal stenosis/stricture preventing advancement of a therapeutic endoscope during screening/baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD.) Subjects are eligible if the stenosis/stricture is dilated to at least 15mm, but baseline treatment may need to be delayed.
- Any endoscopically-visualized abnormalities such as ulcers, masses or nodules during screening/baseline EGD within 3 cm of the treatment area.
- Subjects with nodular polyps or suspicion of invasive cancer by white light endoscopy /enhanced imaging/biopsy identified during screening/baseline EGD
- Suspicion of malignancy by abdominal or endoscopic ultrasound imaging based on malignant lymph nodes, invasion of lesion beyond mucosa.
- EMR or polypectomy \< 6 weeks prior to baseline treatment.
- Untreated invasive esophageal malignancy, including margin-positive EMR.
- Active duodenitis in treatment zone during screening/baseline EGD.
- Severe medical comorbidities precluding endoscopy, or limiting life expectancy to less than 2 years in the judgment of the endoscopist.
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy or inability to be off anticoagulation or anti-platelet medication per standards of the institutions performing cryoablation.
- Known portal hypertension, visible esophageal, gastric, or duodenal varices, or history of varices.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Pentax Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcia I. Canto, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2019
First Posted
February 20, 2019
Study Start
May 13, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 4 years
- Access Criteria
- Submit request to P.I. and study team with study goal.
Submit request to P.I. and study team with study goal.