NCT03843203

Brief Summary

Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. FM worldwide prevalence according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 diagnostic criteria is estimated under 5,4%. In USA the burden caused by FM is estimated at 29 billions every year, due to assistance, health care costs and retirement to loss of productivity. It is known that conventional pharmacological approaches present poor therapeutic response in more than 50% of these patients. It is conceivable that this limited results, at least in part, due to the lack of a complete elucidation of its pathophysiology. Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment. In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. FM patients will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

PainBrain derived neurotrophic factorfunctional capacity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in pain level - first phase

    Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 to 100mm) (0 means no pain - 100 means the worst pain imaginable)

    1 month

  • Change in functional capacity - first phase

    Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Total score on the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (BPCP:S) (range from 0 to 93; high numbers means more pain severity, interference in daily activities and emotional burden)

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in pain level - second phase

    3 months

  • Change in functional capacity - second phase

    3 months

  • Change in Function of modulatory descending system

    1 month

  • Change in Function of corticospinal pathway

    1 month

  • Change in levels of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF

    1 month

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

s-tDCS

SHAM COMPARATOR

\- Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS The patients will receive tDCS sham treatment. The patients will receive sham tDCS treatment over primary motor cortex. According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at o contralateral F3. In sham stimulation the device only release flow current, in the first 30 s of session and in the remaining 30s in the end of the session, during 20 minutes.

Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS

M1 a-tDCS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over primary motor cortex. * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at contralateral supraorbital Fp2. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.

Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS

DLPFC a-tDCS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.

Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS

Interventions

\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it

DLPFC a-tDCSM1 a-tDCSs-tDCS

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women, who are able to read and write, with confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (2010-2016).
  • Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Reside outside the Greater Porto Alegre area
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemaker; cochlear implant;
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological diseases; history of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases, and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or under treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90.450-120, Brazil

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.

    PMID: 21878603BACKGROUND
  • Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.

    PMID: 22031874BACKGROUND
  • Silva AF, Zortea M, Carvalho S, Leite J, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00185-w.

    PMID: 28273933BACKGROUND
  • Zanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.

    PMID: 25005881BACKGROUND
  • Lopes Alves R, Zortea M, Vicuna Serrano P, Laranjeira VDS, Franceschini Tocchetto B, Ramalho L, Fernanda da Silveira Alves C, Brugnera Tomedi R, Pereira de Almeida R, Machado Bruck S, Medeiros L, R S Sanches P, P Silva D Jr, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Modulation of neural networks and symptom correlated in fibromyalgia: A randomized double-blind multi-group explanatory clinical trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation. PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0288830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288830. eCollection 2024.

  • Caumo W, Lopes Ramos R, Vicuna Serrano P, da Silveira Alves CF, Medeiros L, Ramalho L, Tomeddi R, Bruck S, Boher L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Ls Torres I, Fregni F. Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in the Disability Due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Factorial Sham-Randomized Clinical Study. J Pain. 2024 Feb;25(2):376-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

  • Serrano PV, Zortea M, Alves RL, Beltran G, Bavaresco C, Ramalho L, Alves CFDS, Medeiros L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Lucena da Silva Torres I, Fregni F, Caumo W. The effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive performance in fibromyalgia: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:992742. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.992742. eCollection 2022.

  • Caumo W, Alves RL, Vicuna P, Alves CFDS, Ramalho L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP, da Silva Torres IL, Fregni F. Impact of Bifrontal Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain Catastrophizing and Disability due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study. J Pain. 2022 Apr;23(4):641-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaPain

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Officials

  • Wolnei Caumo, PhD

    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Wolnei Caumo, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The researcher will receive equipment already programmed by a research assistant, so the researcher who will deliver the tDCS to perform stimulation will not know the programed stimulation. Patients will be instructed to discuss aspects of treatment with the respective investigator. Two independent evaluators who will not participate in the consultations where guidance on the use of tDCS will be provided will be trained to make outcome assessments in follow-up. Patients will not be aware of the type of intervention received, since the sham condition produces a stimulus, but no expected effects. In order to study the level of the blinding, at each moment of evaluation, the patient will be asked about the type of intervention that he / she believes to have received (active or simulated), and about the degree of safety in the response, using a standardized questionnaire. The blinding will be evaluated at the end of each treatment week by means of a standardized instrument.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, M.D, PhD.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2018

First Posted

February 18, 2019

Study Start

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

January 1, 2021

Last Updated

February 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations