BIS-Guided Sedation in Critically Ill Patients Under Deep Sedation
Effect of Bispectral Index (BIS)-Guided Sedation on Delirium and Sedative Drug Requirements in Critically Ill Patients Under Deep Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of sedation guided by the bispectral index (BIS) in reducing the incidence of delirium and the doses of sedative drugs used in critical patients who require deep sedation. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does sedation guided by BIS lead to higher delirium and coma-free days compared to clinical monitoring?
- Does sedation guided by BIS result in reduced doses of sedative drugs compared to clinical monitoring? Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Clinical Monitoring Group: Participants in this group will receive sedation based on clinical scales. These participants will also be fitted with a BIS sensor, but the sensor will be covered. Sedation Guided by BIS Group: Participants in this group will receive sedation guided by the bispectral index. The study will be conducted as a prospective, controlled, blind intervention trial with random distribution and intention to treat. The primary outcomes to be evaluated include:
- Delirium and coma-free days after the end of deep sedation using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scale.
- Total dose of sedative drugs administered.
- BIS values Researchers will compare the two groups to determine if sedation guided by BIS is associated with a higher number of delirium and coma-free days, reduced sedative drug doses, and higher values of BIS compared to clinical monitoring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 1, 2023
July 1, 2023
3.1 years
February 3, 2019
July 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Compare delirium and coma free days until 14 days after end of deep sedation
To compare the number of Delirium and Coma-Free Days until day 14 after the cessation of deep sedation in patients receiving sedation guided by the Bispectral Index (BIS) vs. sedation guided by clinical scales. Delirium will be assessed using the CAM-ICU scale (Ely EW et al.) by non-ICU researchers who are blinded to the randomization allocation. The delirium evaluation will begin when the patient reaches a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of \> -3.
Up to 14 days post end of deep sedation
Compare the doses of sedative drugs received
To compare the total doses of Propofol, Midazolam, and Remifentanil (calculated in mg/kg) received during the period of deep sedation
From date of randomization until the date of end of deep sedation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days
Compare values of BIS
To compare the values of Bispectral Index (BIS) in patients receiving sedation guided by the Bispectral Index (BIS) versus sedation guided by clinical scales. This outcome will assess the BIS values recorded during the period of deep sedation and compare them between the two groups
From date of randomization until the date of end of deep sedation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time with values of BIS less than 40
From date of randomization until the date of end of deep sedation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days
Compare days alive and free of the ICU
From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 days
Compare days alive and free of the hospital
From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 days
Compare days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 30
From date of randomization until the date of end of mechanical ventilation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 30 days
Compare days alive and free of mechanical ventilation through Study Day 60
From date of randomization until the date of end of mechanical ventilation or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Compare mortality at 60 days after randomization
Until 60 days after randomization
Study Arms (2)
Sedation guided by Clinical Scales
NO INTERVENTIONSedative guided by RASS (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale) score. Target RASS: -4 / -5.
Sedation guided by Bispectral Index
EXPERIMENTALSedation guided by the Bispectral Index (BIS). Target BIS between 40 to 60.
Interventions
The sedative dose administered through a continuous infusion pump will be adjusted based on the BIS value to maintain a target range of 40 to 60. If the BIS value is below the target range, the dose will be increased, and if it exceeds the range, the dose will be decreased, aiming to keep the BIS within the desired range.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years.
- Under mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit
- Indication of deep sedation (RASS objective -4, -5)
- Admission to the ICU or indication of deep sedation up to 8 hours prior to randomization.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with end-of-life care.
- Family refusal to participate in the study.
- Impossibility to place the BIS sensor (burns, extensive lesions on the forehead, prone position, etc.).
- Patients with intracranial hypertension or convulsive status, in whom sedation has the objective of suppressing electroencephalographic waves.
- Patients who, following a decrease in sedation, have a coma, vegetative state or a state of minimal consciousness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Capital Federal, 1173, Argentina
Related Publications (7)
MacKenzie KK, Britt-Spells AM, Sands LP, Leung JM. Processed Electroencephalogram Monitoring and Postoperative Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):417-427. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002323.
PMID: 29912008BACKGROUNDSalluh JI, Soares M, Teles JM, Ceraso D, Raimondi N, Nava VS, Blasquez P, Ugarte S, Ibanez-Guzman C, Centeno JV, Laca M, Grecco G, Jimenez E, Arias-Rivera S, Duenas C, Rocha MG; Delirium Epidemiology in Critical Care Study Group. Delirium epidemiology in critical care (DECCA): an international study. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R210. doi: 10.1186/cc9333. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
PMID: 21092264BACKGROUNDEly EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.
PMID: 11445689BACKGROUNDDevlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
PMID: 30113379BACKGROUNDSessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
PMID: 12421743BACKGROUNDShetty RM, Bellini A, Wijayatilake DS, Hamilton MA, Jain R, Karanth S, Namachivayam A. BIS monitoring versus clinical assessment for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource utilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 21;2(2):CD011240. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011240.pub2.
PMID: 29464690BACKGROUNDHuespe I, Giunta D, Acosta K, Avila D, Prado E, Sanghavi D, Bisso IC, Giannasi S, Carini FC. Comparing Bispectral Index Monitoring vs Clinical Assessment for Deep Sedation in the ICU: Effects on Delirium Reduction and Sedative Drug Doses-A Randomized Trial. Chest. 2024 Oct;166(4):733-742. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.05.031. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
PMID: 38901489DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sergio Giannasi, MD
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Federico Carini, MD
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ivan A. Huespe, MD
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The primary outcome "Compare delirium and coma-free days until 14 days after the end of deep sedation" will be assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) scale. The evaluations will be conducted by blinded evaluators who are unaware of the patient's assigned sedation management group
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2019
First Posted
February 15, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 22, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will be made available at the end of the study, in 2024.
- Access Criteria
- All data requirements will be evaluated by the principal investigator and the local Institutional Review Board to ensure compliance with ethical and regulatory guidelines regarding data access and protection
Individual participant data will be made available upon reasonable request.