Use of CoG by Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Evaluation of the CNOGA TensorTip COMBO GLUCOMETER (CoG) During Standardized Meal Test and Consecutive Home Use by Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The CNOGA Combo Glucometer (CoG) employs an invasive glucose meter using blood glucose teststrips and requiering a capillary blood sample obtained from a fingerstick and in addition, a non-invasive optical component for prediction of tissue glucose at the fingertip. In this study, participants will use both devices during meal tests and also at home during routine care. The results from the device will be compared to a standard reference method and will be used to determine the accuracy of the two device components.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
February 1, 2019
8 months
July 21, 2018
January 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
CoG accuracy in measuring glucose levels (non-invasively) during a standardized meal experiment.
Comparison of non-invasive CoG device measurements (tissue glucose in mg/dL) with the results of a standard laboratory reference method (YSI glucose analyzer, blood glucose in mg/dL) by consensus-error grid analysis
Experiment will be performed twice within 3 months
CoG accuracy in monitoring glucose levels (invasively) during a standardized meal experiment.
Comparison of CoG invasive device readings (blood glucose in mg/dL) with the results of a standard laboratory reference method (YSI glucose analyzer, blood glucose in mg/dL) by consensus-error grid analysis
Experiment will be performed twice within 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Impact of the CoG on long-term (three month) glycemic control (HbA1c using standard laboratory procedures) in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes
3 months
Treatment satisfaction questionnaire
3 months
Interventions
Generation of non-invasive and invasive glucose readings for comparison with a standard laboratory reference glucose determination method (YSI glucose analyzer)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, any treatment) of other than caucasian origin, who are experienced with performing blood glucose self-testing.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes of Afro-American, Hispanic, or Asian-American origin
- Subjects who are able to provide informed consent (by him/herself or by his/her guardian);
- years old and above;
- HbA1c \< 10 %
- Anatomically suitable finger as determined by the clinical investigator and detailed in section 4
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects requiring dialysis;
- Any conditions that may hamper good visual contact between the finger and sensor, such as raised birthmarks, scars and/or tattoos;
- Pregnancy;
- Nursing mothers;
- Any skin injuries on the measured finger;
- Severe disease conditions (cancer etc.)
- Any condition that may prevent patients from successful participation in the trial (in discretion of the investigator)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sciema UGlead
- Cnoga Medical Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mills-Penisnsula Medical Center
San Mateo, California, 94596, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Filiz Demircik, PhD
Sciema UG
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2018
First Posted
February 15, 2019
Study Start
July 16, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
March 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share