NCT03839368

Brief Summary

In patients with angle fracture , will the (K) shaped titanium miniplates provide more stable fixation than two conventional miniplates? Many studies have been conducted to compare between different techniques of fixation used in angle fracture fixation. The driving force behind this study was to design a new plate that would overcome the disadvantages of the other plating techniques but has the advantages \& simplicity of the Champy technique (simple intraoral approach and few major complications). This new miniplate gives more biomechanical stability than the conventional Champy plate. More over the placement of a 3D miniplate or two separate miniplates for fixing angle fractures is more difficult and mostly will require a transbuccal approach , with increased surgical trauma, longer operation time unlike the new plate that could provide the clinician with a simple and reliable solution.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 11, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 11, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

10 days

First QC Date

February 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 1, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

angle fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Stability of angle fracture fixation

    Inter-ramus distance (fixed position at the lingual), inter-mental distance will be obtained from the immediate postoperative facial bone CT \& after 3 months. Comparison between the 2 records will be done to assess the stability of fixation technique. Bone density will be measured by Hounsfield unit at fracture site immediate postoperative \& after 3 months using F.B.CT.

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

K plate

EXPERIMENTAL

fixation of angle fracture using K plate versus two miniplates

Procedure: fixation of angle fracture

Conventional two miniplates

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

fixation of angle fracture using K plate versus two miniplates

Procedure: fixation of angle fracture

Interventions

open reduction and internal fixation of angle fracture

Conventional two miniplatesK plate

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with unilateral angle fracture.
  • Patients free from any systemic disease \& bone metabolism diseases.
  • No sex predilection
  • Age range ( 15-70)

You may not qualify if:

  • Comminuted fragmented \& infected angle fractures.
  • Bilateral angle fracture.
  • Systemic diseases.
  • bone metabolism diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Suer BT, Kocyigit ID, Kaman S, Tuz HH, Tekin U, Atil F. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

    PMID: 24582290BACKGROUND
  • El-Sherif HM, Ali S, Talaat M, Mubarak F. Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Feb;23(1):107-113. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Jaw FracturesMaxillofacial InjuriesFacial InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesSkull FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Hagar Mohamed, BDS

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hagar A Mohamed, BDS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Cards will have sequential numbers one number for each card then these cards will be placed within opaque sealed envelopes. Then these envelops will be placed in a container (box), each participant will grasp one envelope the day of procedure.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Nasser Institute Hospital for research & treatment / Master Candidate of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Cairo University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2019

First Posted

February 15, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion

April 11, 2020

Study Completion

April 1, 2021

Last Updated

June 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share