The Effectiveness of Soft Tissue Vibration in Reducing Pain of Local Anesthesia Injection in Adult Dental Patients
The Effectiveness of Automated Soft Tissue Vibration in Reducing Pain and Accelerating Action of Intraoral Local Anesthesia Injections in Adult Dental Patients. A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The clinical trial will compare pain perception during dental local anesthesia injections with and without using soft tissue vibration device prior to injection. The primary goal is to test the effectiveness of such devices in pain/discomfort reduction during intraoral local anesthesia injections in various techniques (infiltration and block anesthesia).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 5, 2019
CompletedSeptember 10, 2019
September 1, 2019
4 months
January 30, 2019
September 9, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain of needle penetration of buccal LA injection
The pain of needle penetration will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
1-2 seconds after mucosal penetration
Pain of anesthesia delivery during buccal LA infiltration
The pain during anesthesia solution delivery will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
30 seconds after LA solution delivery
Pain of needle penetration of palatal LA injection
The pain of needle penetration will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
1-2 seconds after mucosal penetration
Pain of anesthesia delivery during palatal LA infiltration
The pain during anesthesia solution delivery will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
30 seconds after LA solution delivery
Pain of needle penetration of IAN block LA injection
The pain of needle penetration will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
1-2 seconds after mucosal penetration
Pain of anesthesia delivery during IAN block LA injection
The pain during anesthesia solution delivery will be assessed using 10-point Graphic Rating Scale (GRS). The pain score will be compared to its counterpart pain score on the experimental side using DentalVibe® injection system.
30 seconds after LA solution delivery
Study Arms (6)
Pain of buccal injection with DentalVibe®
EXPERIMENTALDentalVibe® Comfort Injection System will be used prior and during the local anesthesia (LA) buccal injection. The LA to be used is Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine dental injection.
Pain of buccal injection without DentalVibe®
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia (LA) for buccal infiltration using Lidocaine Epinephrine dental injection. No tissue vibrations will be performed before or during the injection.
Pain of palatal injection with DentalVibe®
EXPERIMENTALDentalVibe® Comfort Injection System will be used prior and during the local anesthesia (LA) palatal injection. The LA to be used is Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine dental injection.
Pain of palatal injection without DentalVibe®
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia (LA) for palatal infiltration using Lidocaine Epinephrine dental injection. No tissue vibrations will be performed before or during the injection.
Pain of block injection with DentalVibe®
EXPERIMENTALDentalVibe® Comfort Injection System will be used prior and during the local anesthesia (LA) injection for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block. The LA to be used is Lidocaine 2% with Epinephrine dental injection.
Pain of block injection without DentalVibe®
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal anesthesia (LA) injection for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block using Lidocaine Epinephrine dental injection. No tissue vibrations will be performed before or during the injection.
Interventions
Soft tissue vibration for 10 seconds using DentalVibe®. The device induces approximately 16 soft tissue vibrations of per second. The device will be in touch of oral mucosa (at the site of injection) before and during the local anesthesia injection.
Dental local anesthesia injection of 1.8 mL Lidocaine (2%) with Epinephrine (1:80000 w/v).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I
- Planned for multiple dental treatments in the maxilla and mandible bilaterally
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years old
- Pregnant ladies
- Smokers and alcoholics
- Patients on medications
- Drug abusers
- Never received dental treatment under local anesthesia before
- Patients with an acute infection with or without fever
- Patients with preoperative pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riyadh Elm University
Riyadh, 12734, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ra'ed G Salma
Riyadh Elm University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2019
First Posted
February 15, 2019
Study Start
March 20, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 5, 2019
Last Updated
September 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share