NCT03838549

Brief Summary

Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common choice for mastectomy reconstruction. Whatever the choice of mastectomy incision, a scar remains on or near the breast volume. Current techniques involve partial or total coverage of the implant with the pectoralis major muscle, to prevent exposure or infection. The muscle dissection technique applied has functional and cosmetic consequences. In this study, an endoscopic approach will be evaluated. This new surgical technique, using a single-port endoscopic way, will put the scar is in the axillary area, away from the breast. The hypothesis is that this delocalized scar potentially reduces the risk of exposure and allows placement of the implant in the subcutaneous space, with no manipulation of the pectoralis major muscle.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 26, 2019

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 26, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 26, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Prophylactic Surgical ProcedureSubcutaneous MastectomyEndoscopyBreast ReconstructionBreast Implants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • success rate of total mastectomy

    The total mastectomy is done by a scar in the axillary area, away from the breast, using single port endoscopy, with Implant base reconstruction in pre pectoral position. Complete excision of the gland by means of an incision on the axillary line, Installation of a definitive smooth prosthesis, Absence of conversion to a conventional approach, No skin necrosis

    one day

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Operative time

    one day

  • Open surgery conversion rate

    one day

  • Number of participants with an infection

    1 and 3 months after the prophylactic mastectomy

  • Blood loss

    one day

  • Number of participants with a local haematoma

    Between the day of the prophylactic mastectomy and a month later

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

implant for breast reconstruction

EXPERIMENTAL

20 patients female with genetic risk for breast cancer and who ask for prophylactic mastectomy. They will have a prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

Procedure: Prophylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

Interventions

It is an endoscopic approach for prophylactic mastectomy using an axillary single port

implant for breast reconstruction

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with an indication for prophylactic uni or bilateral mastectomy (Genetic risk factors for breast cancer)
  • Ask an immediate breast reconstruction during the surgery
  • World Heath Organization score \<3
  • Glandular volume : french bra cup size A, B ou C
  • Glandular ptosis \<=2 (Classification and Algorithm for Treatment of Breast Ptosis)
  • Contraception for woman of childbearing age and no pregnancy
  • Valid Social Security
  • Wrote consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of breast cancer surgery
  • Breast cancer not operated on the side concerned by the prophylactic mastectomy
  • Patient having had irradiant treatment
  • Breast hypertrophy
  • Smoking \> 10 cigarette/day
  • Body Mass Index \> 30
  • Large breast volume requiring prostheses \> 500ml
  • Chronic pulmonary obstructive gold 4
  • ASA (Physical Status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) \> 3
  • Chronic shoulder pain on the side to operate, or both shoulders
  • History of abarticular pathology of the shoulder on the operating side
  • Patient involvment in another clinical research
  • Protected patient or unable to give consent
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Vulnerable person (Article L1121-6 of the Public Health Code)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montpellier University Hospital

Montpellier, Hérault, 34295, France

Location

Related Publications (27)

  • Jakub JW, Peled AW, Gray RJ, Greenup RA, Kiluk JV, Sacchini V, McLaughlin SA, Tchou JC, Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Willey S. Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study. JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):123-129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422.

    PMID: 28903167BACKGROUND
  • Colwell AS, Christensen JM. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S-50S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003949.

    PMID: 29064921BACKGROUND
  • Muller T, Baratte A, Bruant-Rodier C, Bodin F, Mathelin C. Oncological safety of nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy: A review of the literature on 3716 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2018 Jun;63(3):e6-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

    PMID: 29030030BACKGROUND
  • Casella D, Di Taranto G, Marcasciano M, Sordi S, Kothari A, Kovacs T, Lo Torto F, Cigna E, Ribuffo D, Calabrese C. Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop(R) Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. Breast. 2018 Jun;39:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 18.

    PMID: 29455110BACKGROUND
  • Miyake R, Kinoshita S, Shimada N, Uchida K, Takeyama H, Morikawa T. Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer. Surg Today. 2018 Jun;48(6):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1633-z. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

    PMID: 29468434BACKGROUND
  • Co M, Chiu R, Chiu TM, Chong YC, Lau S, Lee YH, To HM, Kwong A. Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Its Application on BRCA Gene Mutation Carrier. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Dec;17(8):581-584. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

    PMID: 28428099BACKGROUND
  • Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942.

    PMID: 29064922BACKGROUND
  • Mitchell MP, Wagner J, Butterworth J. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction, a modern challenge in postmastectomy radiation planning. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):153-156. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

    PMID: 29233522BACKGROUND
  • Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003627.

    PMID: 28574950BACKGROUND
  • Highton L, Johnson R, Kirwan C, Murphy J. Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 19;5(9):e1488. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488. eCollection 2017 Sep.

    PMID: 29062655BACKGROUND
  • Heidemann LN, Gunnarsson GL, Salzberg CA, Sorensen JA, Thomsen JB. Complications following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Acellular Dermal Matrix Implant-based Breast Reconstruction-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan 12;6(1):e1625. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001625. eCollection 2018 Jan.

    PMID: 29464161BACKGROUND
  • Glasberg SB. The Economics of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):49S-52S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004051.

    PMID: 29166348BACKGROUND
  • Kompatscher P. Endoscopic capsulotomy of capsular contracture after breast augmentation: a very challenging therapeutic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Dec;90(6):1125-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199212000-00049. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1448521BACKGROUND
  • Lai HW, Chen ST, Chen DR, Chen SL, Chang TW, Kuo SJ, Kuo YL, Hung CS. Current Trends in and Indications for Endoscopy-Assisted Breast Surgery for Breast Cancer: Results from a Six-Year Study Conducted by the Taiwan Endoscopic Breast Surgery Cooperative Group. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):e0150310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150310. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 26950469BACKGROUND
  • Lai HW, Lin HY, Chen SL, Chen ST, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Endoscopy-assisted surgery for the management of benign breast tumors: technique, learning curve, and patient-reported outcome from preliminary 323 procedures. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1080-5.

    PMID: 28077134BACKGROUND
  • Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST, Kuok KM, Chen SL, Lin YL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Single-Axillary-Incision Endoscopic-Assisted Hybrid Technique for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Technique, Preliminary Results, and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome from Preliminary 50 Procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1340-1349. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6383-z. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PMID: 29484564BACKGROUND
  • Lai HW, Wu HS, Chuang KL, Chen DR, Chang TW, Kuo SJ, Chen ST, Kuo YL. Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) Flap Reconstruction: Preliminary Results of 48 Patients. Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):382-9. doi: 10.1177/1553350614546003. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

    PMID: 25118202BACKGROUND
  • Leff DR, Vashisht R, Yongue G, Keshtgar M, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Endoscopic breast surgery: where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):607-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1258-4. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

    PMID: 21128113BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Wu JX, Guan S. A Technique of Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. JSLS. 2017 Apr-Jun;21(2):e2017.00028. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00028.

    PMID: 28684896BACKGROUND
  • Ng TB, Lee HM, Cheng CH, Wong CC. Study on the purification of growth hormone-like substance from pituitaries of the snake Ptyas mucosa. Prep Biochem. 1993 Aug;23(3):351-61. doi: 10.1080/10826069308544561.

    PMID: 8361955BACKGROUND
  • Tukenmez M, Ozden BC, Agcaoglu O, Kecer M, Ozmen V, Muslumanoglu M, Igci A. Videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):77-82. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0172. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

    PMID: 24401140BACKGROUND
  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28692558BACKGROUND
  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

    PMID: 27810700BACKGROUND
  • Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N, Honart JF, Alkhashnam H, Tran de Fremicourt K, Conversano A, Rimareix F, Simon M, Michiels S, Kolb F. Robotic Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2579-2586. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6555-x. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

    PMID: 29959612BACKGROUND
  • Rathat G, Blay L, Bakenga J, Roggen N, Peralta G, Baekelandt J. Scarless preventive surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;163(2):701-702. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15039. Epub 2023 Aug 7. No abstract available.

  • Rathat G, Fontaine V, Chaumette M, Duraes M. [How I do... an endoscopic mastectomy in 10 steps]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2024 Nov;52(11):653-656. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 29. No abstract available. French.

  • Rathat G, Chaumette M, Fontaine V, Rebel L, Pissarra J, Duflos C, Duraes M. Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan;54(1):102862. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseBreast Neoplasms

Interventions

Prophylactic Mastectomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease SusceptibilityDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MastectomySurgical Procedures, OperativeProphylactic Surgical Procedures

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2019

First Posted

February 12, 2019

Study Start

April 26, 2019

Primary Completion

September 26, 2025

Study Completion

September 26, 2025

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations