Evaluation of MAF-1217 in Patients With DED
Evaluation of the Performance of the Tear Substitute MAF-1217 in Patients With Evaporative DED
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a pre-market, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy of MAF-1217 and Cationorm® in adult patients with evaporative DED. The study population will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED:
- 1.Group A: high evaporative levels
- 2.Group B: females in menopause, whether using hormonal integration or not
- 3.Group C: presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease
- 4.Group D: glaucomatous patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2019
CompletedJuly 15, 2019
July 1, 2019
7 months
January 31, 2019
July 12, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Break-up time (BUT) differences
Changes in break-up time (BUT) versus baseline
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Secondary Outcomes (7)
ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival)
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia)
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
number of blinking per minute
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Ferning test (Group D)
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
osmolarity
measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MAF1217/Cationorm
EXPERIMENTALCationorm/MAF1217
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old (adult patients), male and female
- Schirmer I test \> 10 mm at 5'
- (Group A): high evaporative levels
- (Group B): females in menopause, both using hormonal integration or not
- (Group C): presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease, defined as at least one of the following:
- Meibomian orifice plugging
- eyelid margin foaminess
- changes in orifice position with respect to the mucocutaneous junction
- abnormal Meibomian gland secretions (opaque and viscous-like form that is difficult to express)
- (Group D): glaucomatous patients receiving one or more BAK preserved treatments for at least 2 years, showing an abnormal Ferning test (Types 3 or 4 according to Rolando)
- all: wishing to participate in the study and able to sign the ICF
- BUT \< 7"
- Mild to severe DED according to OSDI chart
You may not qualify if:
- Neuropathic causes of dry eye (diabetes, long-standing contact lens wearing, previous ocular herpes infections)
- Coexisting corneal diseases
- Autoimmune diseases
- Past or active cicatricial conjunctivitis
- Past ocular surface burns
- Keratinization of the eyelid margin
- Sjogren syndrome
- History of corneal trauma
- Pregnant and lactating women
- Younger than 18 years old patients
- Use of contact lenses
- inability to self administer study medications
- (GROUPS B, D) Presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease
- (GROUP C) Presence of cicatricial Meibomian gland disease
- known allergic sensitivity to any of the devices ingredients or any other known allergy
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VISUfarma SpAlead
Study Sites (2)
Ospedale San Paolo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
Milan, 20121, Italy
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco P.O.L. Sacco
Milan, 20157, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Fogagnolo P, Quisisana C, Caretti A, Marchina D, Dei Cas M, Melardi E, Rossetti L. Efficacy and Safety of VisuEvo(R) and Cationorm(R) for the Treatment of Evaporative and Non-Evaporative Dry Eye Disease: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Cross-Over, Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 18;14:1651-1663. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S258081. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32606580DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2019
First Posted
February 7, 2019
Study Start
November 27, 2018
Primary Completion
June 19, 2019
Study Completion
June 19, 2019
Last Updated
July 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07