NCT03833544

Brief Summary

This study evaluates whether a 4-week exercise training program focusing on lower limb flexors can improve lower limb motor function late after stroke. It is hypothesized that there would be significant improvements in gait and strength of the flexor muscles as a result of the training. It is also hypothesized that the training effects, if any, would be retained at 4 weeks after ending the training.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 7, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 3, 2019

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Changes in Speed During Overground Gait

    To test if the training can improve gait speed during overground walking, gait speeds will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the gait speed changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Speed During Obstacle Crossing

    To test if the training can improve the speed during obstacle crossing (stepping over a 4x1.5x60 cm\^3 wooden block), speeds during obstacle crossing will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the speed changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Step Length During Overground Gait

    To test if the training can improve the step length during overground walking, step lengths will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the step length changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Step Length During Obstacle Crossing

    To test if training can improve the step length during obstacle crossing (stepping over a 4x1.5x60 cm\^3 wooden block), step lengths during obstacle crossing will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the step length changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Toe Clearance During Overground Gait

    To test if the training can improve toe clearance during overground walking, toe clearances will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the toe clearance changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Toe Clearance During Obstacle Crossing

    To test if the training can improve the toe clearance during obstacle crossing (stepping over a 4x1.5x60 cm\^3 wooden block), toe clearances during obstacle crossing will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the toe clearance changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Peak Knee Flexion Angle in the Swing Phase During Overground Gait

    To test if training can improve the peak knee flexion angle in the swing phase during overground walking, knee flexion angles will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the angle changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Peak Knee Flexion Angle in the Swing Phase During Obstacle Crossing

    To test if the training can improve the peak knee flexion angle in the swing phase during obstacle crossing (stepping over a 4x1.5x60 cm\^3 wooden block), knee flexion angles will be obtained using a video-based 3D motion capture system before and after the training. To test if the angle changes are maintained after training, a follow-up test will be performed 4 weeks after training finished.

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Changes in Muscle Activation Profiles During Overground Gait

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Muscle Activation Profiles During Obstacle Crossing

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in 6-min Walk Distance

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Muscle Strength

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • Changes in Force Steadiness

    Weeks 1-2: Baseline Assessment (2-3 times); Weeks 3-6: Training (no assessment); Week 7: Post-training Assessment (within 1 week after the end of training); Week 10: Follow-up Assessment (4 weeks after the end of training)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Treatment Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise training: Progressive resistance training of hip, knee, and ankle flexors.

Other: Exercise training

Interventions

Progressive resistance training of hip, knee, and ankle flexors.

Treatment Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Time post-stroke between 6 months and 3 years
  • Able to walk with or without an assistive device for 7 m independently
  • Abnormal flexor synergy in both hip and knee joints (score 1 or 2) on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity section II: Volitional movement within synergies (Fugl-Meyer et al., 1975)
  • Walk slower than 1 m/s
  • Able to understand and follow simple instructions
  • Agree not to participate in strength training or supervised physical therapy during and for at least 4 weeks after the completion of training
  • Previous participation in the physical therapy program for stroke without experiencing excessive symptoms (shortness of breath, headache, prolonged fatigue)

You may not qualify if:

  • Current symptomatic coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure
  • History of myocardial infarction
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (\>150/90 mm Hg)
  • Lower limb fracture in the past 6 months
  • Lower limb joint or muscular problems
  • Acute or terminal illness
  • Current participation in strength training or supervised physical therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Methodist Rehabilitation Center

Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.

    PMID: 3809245BACKGROUND
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.

    PMID: 1135616BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • John W Chow, PhD

    Methodist Rehabiliation Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2019

First Posted

February 7, 2019

Study Start

June 3, 2019

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

May 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations