Impact of a Predictive Score of Bowel Preparation Quality in Clinical Practice
REPREP2
Intensive High-volume Bowel Cleansing Regimen Versus Low-volume Bowel Regimen in Patients With a High Risk of Poor Colonic Cleansing Following a Validated Predictive Score
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single center randomized controlled trial to compare the colon cleansing quality determined by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale achieved by two strategies in patients with high risk of poor colon cleansing defined as those patients with a score\> 1.225 following a predictive score previously published: one group will receive an intensified split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus bisacodyl and 3 days of fiber-free diet and the other group a split-dose 2 L PEG solution with ascorbic plus bisacodyl and 1 day of fiber-free diet. Patients with a score ≤ 1.225 will receive a split-dose 2 L PEG solution with ascorbic plus bisacodyl and 1 day of fiber-free diet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedMarch 13, 2020
March 1, 2020
9 months
February 2, 2019
March 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale
This scale goes from 0 (no preparation) to 3 points (excellent preparation) in the three segments of the colon (proximal, transverse and distal). The maximum score is 9 points
8 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of polyps detected in each arm
8 months
Tolerance to bowel preparation
8 months
Study Arms (2)
Large volume based preparation
EXPERIMENTALThis strategy will consist of split dose 4 L polyethylene glycol plus 10 mg bisacodyl plus 3 days of fiber-free diet.
Low volume based preparation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis strategy will consist of split dose 2 L polyethylene glycol plus Ascorbic acid plus 1 day of fiber-free diet
Interventions
The experimental arm will take 4 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) in split dose plus bisacodyl and 3 days of fiber-free diet
The control arm will take 2 L polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus ascorbic acid in split dose plus 1 day of fiber-free diet
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Outpatient colonoscopy
- Willing to participate (informed consent signed).
You may not qualify if:
- Intestinal perforation
- Poorly controlled arterial hypertension (HTAS\> 180 HTAD\> 100)
- Congestive heart failure
- NYHA III-IV
- Acute hepatic failure
- End-stage renal disease (creatinine \<15 ml / min dialysis or pre-dialysis)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Known hypersensitivity reaction to drug components
- Phenylketonuria or Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- Dementia with difficulty in intake of Preparation
- Past history of poor bowel preparation colonic cleanliness
- Inability to follow the instructions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Gastroenterology
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, 38320, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Hernandez G, Aldea A, Nicolas-Perez D, Jimenez A, Carrillo M, Felipe V, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Moreno M, Ramos L, Quintero E. Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;112(6):951-958. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.53. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
PMID: 28291237RESULTGimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, Morales D, Gonzalez-Perez CD, Nicolas-Perez D, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Jimenez A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Carrillo M, Ramos L, Quintero E. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):536-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101683. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PMID: 28282690RESULTDik VK, Moons LM, Huyuk M, van der Schaar P, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Ter Borg PC, Meijssen MA, Ouwendijk RJ, Le Fevre DM, Stouten M, van der Galien O, Hiemstra TJ, Monkelbaan JF, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD; Colonoscopy Quality Initiative. Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
PMID: 25600879RESULTHassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PMID: 22239959RESULTGimeno-Garcia AZ, Benitez-Zafra F, Hernandez A, Hernandez-Negrin D, Nicolas-Perez D, Hernandez G, Baute-Dorta JL, Cedres Y, Del-Castillo R, Mon J, Jimenez A, Navarro-Davila MA, Rodriguez-Hernandez E, Alarcon O, Romero R, Felipe V, Segura N, Hernandez-Guerra M. Agreement between the perception of colon cleansing reported by patients and colon cleansing assessed by a validated colon cleansing scale. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;47(2):130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 2. English, Spanish.
PMID: 36870478DERIVEDGimeno-Garcia AZ, Hernandez G, Baute Dorta JL, Reygosa C, de la Barreda R, Hernandez-Bustabad A, Amaral C, Cedres Y, Del Castillo R, Nicolas-Perez D, Jimenez A, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Hernandez D, Ramos L, Carrillo M, Felipe V, Hernandez A, Rodriguez-Jimenez C, Quintero E. An Enhanced High-Volume Preparation for Colonoscopy Is Not Better Than a Conventional Low-Volume One in Patients at Risk of Poor Bowel Cleansing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 22;8:654847. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.654847. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33829030DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Goretti Hernandez, MD
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Only the endoscopists in charge of rating the bowel cleansing during the colonoscopy will be masked
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2019
First Posted
February 5, 2019
Study Start
February 4, 2019
Primary Completion
October 21, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
March 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03