A Fast-track Versus Conventional Recovery Protocol in Laparoscopic Hysterctomy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Factors affecting to length of hospital stay after fast-track recovery program in laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional recovery program
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 31, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2019
CompletedFebruary 4, 2019
February 1, 2019
2 years
January 21, 2019
February 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
length of hospitalisation
time from end of operation until discharge
up to one week
Secondary Outcomes (8)
postoperative pain score
change in 24 hours after surgery
nausea
change in 24 hours after surgery
vomiting
change in 24 hours after surgery
complications
Up to one week.
The use of anelgesics for posoperative pain.
change in 24 hours after surgery
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
fast-track recovery program
ACTIVE COMPARATORPre-operative Verbal and video information Tobacco cessation Daily physical activity Light meal 6 hours and clear liquids up to 2 hours before surgery No bowel preparation A warm blanket Premedication paracetamol 1g and tematsepam 20mg Intraoperatively For nausea and voimiting dexamethasone 10mg, dehydrobensperidol 1mg and ondancetron 4mg before emergence Analgesia: ropivacain at port sites before incision and at vaginal vault Opioids intravenously at discretion of anesthesiologist supplemented with Dexketoprofen 50mg Urinary catheter early removal Postoperative Pain: tramadol 50mg and ketoprofen100mg i.v., oral opioid if needed; patients with normal pain control receive oral pregabalin 25mg every 8 hours, paracetamol 1000mg every 8 hours, ibuprofen 600mg every 8 hours until discharge Out of bed after 2 hours from the end of surgery A liquid diet, if tolerated regular normal diet. For emesis ondansetron 4mg
conventional recovery program
NO INTERVENTIONPreoperative preparation Verbal and written information Cessation of oral intake after previous midnight. Premedication paracetamol 1g+ diatsepam 5mg. Intraoperative A warm blanket at the start of procedure. Prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting: Dexamethasone 5mg at induction, and Dehydrobenzperidol 1mg, ondancetron 4mg before emergence. Analgesia: injection of ropivacain 5% 20ml at port sites at the end of surgery, Opioids i.v. (oxycodone) Postoperative Pain medication:Opioids i.v. (oxycodone), paracetamol 1000mg every 8 hours, ibuprofen 600mg every 8 hours Urinary catheter removal on next morning. Prolonged bowel and bed rest and gradual reintroduction of feeding.
Interventions
Pre-operative: fast-track management counseling, fast-track educational video,tobacco cessation, daily physical activity, light meal 6 hours and clear liquids up to 2 hours before surgery, no bowel preparation, a warm blanket, medication. Intra-operative: vaginal wound infiltrative anesthesia, early remove of urine catheter. Post-operative: early oral intake liquids and food, early mobilization, avoiding opioids by use of pregabaline for postoperative pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- uterine size less than uterine size at 14 weeks of pregnancy
- at list one friend or family available to care to care after discharge.
You may not qualify if:
- endometriosis
- contraindications to any of medications used in the study (oxycodone, ketoprofen, or paracetamol)
- language difficulties (inability to understand and speak Finnish or Swedish)
- age older that 70 years
- mental health disability that limit autonomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Päivi Pakarinen
Helsinki, 00140, Finland
Related Publications (20)
Borendal Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Carlsson P, Kjolhede P. Cost-effectiveness of general anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia in fast-track abdominal benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):326.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.043. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
PMID: 22083055BACKGROUNDKjolhede P, Borendal Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Fredrikson M, Wijma K. Impact of stress coping capacity on recovery from abdominal hysterectomy in a fast-track programme: a prospective longitudinal study. BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):998-1006; discussion 1006-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03342.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
PMID: 22568450BACKGROUNDKjolhede P, Langstrom P, Nilsson P, Wodlin NB, Nilsson L. The impact of quality of sleep on recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Aug 15;8(4):395-402. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2032.
PMID: 22893770BACKGROUNDNilsson L, Wodlin NB, Kjolhede P. Risk factors for postoperative complications after fast-track abdominal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):113-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01395.x. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
PMID: 22224504BACKGROUNDWodlin NB, Nilsson L. The development of fast-track principles in gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jan;92(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01525.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
PMID: 22880948BACKGROUNDWodlin NB, Nilsson L, Kjolhede P. [Fast track has its advantages in elective gynecological surgery]. Lakartidningen. 2014 Jun 17-Jul 1;111(25-26):1120-3. No abstract available. Swedish.
PMID: 25072075BACKGROUNDWodlin NB, Nilsson L, Kjolhede P. Health-related quality of life and postoperative recovery in fast-track hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Apr;90(4):362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01058.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
PMID: 21306322BACKGROUNDVeenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Bonjer HJ, Bemelman WA, Cuesta MA. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012 Feb;255(2):216-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2.
PMID: 22241289BACKGROUNDWijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K. Implementing a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):749-56. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12423. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
PMID: 24828471BACKGROUNDvan Bree SH, Vlug MS, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Zwinderman AH, de Jonge WJ, Snoek SA, Bolhuis K, van der Zanden E, The FO, Bennink RJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopy and fast-track care in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Gastroenterology. 2011 Sep;141(3):872-880.e1-4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.034. Epub 2011 May 26.
PMID: 21699777BACKGROUNDVlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA; LAFA study group. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):868-75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce.
PMID: 21597360BACKGROUNDRelph S, Bell A, Sivashanmugarajan V, Munro K, Chigwidden K, Lloyd S, Fakokunde A, Yoong W. Cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programme for vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of pre and post-implementation expenditures. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Oct-Dec;29(4):399-406. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2182. Epub 2013 May 10.
PMID: 23661616BACKGROUNDRhou YJ, Pather S, Loadsman JA, Campbell N, Philp S, Carter J. Direct hospital costs of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital: a retrospective case-controlled study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Dec;55(6):584-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12093. Epub 2013 May 2.
PMID: 23634987BACKGROUNDMinig L, Chuang L, Patrono MG, Fernandez-Chereguini M, Cardenas-Rebollo JM, Biffi R. Clinical outcomes after fast-track care in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PMID: 26386495BACKGROUNDFeroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M. Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):259-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828ba16f.
PMID: 23751989BACKGROUNDGouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1119-31. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5. Epub 2009 May 5.
PMID: 19415308BACKGROUNDHansen CT, Sorensen M, Moller C, Ottesen B, Kehlet H. Effect of laxatives on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track hysterectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):311.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.902.
PMID: 17403400BACKGROUNDMoller C, Kehlet H, Friland SG, Schouenborg LO, Lund C, Ottesen B. Fast track hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Sep;98(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00342-6.
PMID: 11516794BACKGROUNDKilpio O, Harkki PSM, Mentula MJ, Pakarinen PI. Health-related Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy following Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol or a Conventional Recovery Protocol. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1650-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
PMID: 33582379DERIVEDKilpio O, Harkki PSM, Mentula MJ, Vaananen A, Pakarinen PI. Recovery after enhanced versus conventional care laparoscopic hysterectomy performed in the afternoon: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;151(3):392-398. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13382. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
PMID: 32961589DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Olga Kilpiö, MD
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD Specialist on gynecologic oncology,senior consultant, gynecologic onkology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2019
First Posted
February 4, 2019
Study Start
May 31, 2016
Primary Completion
May 30, 2018
Study Completion
May 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no plan to share a data