The Effects of Tiszasüly and Kolop Mud-pack Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this double-blind, randomized, follow-up study investigators evaluated and compared the effects of Tiszasüly and Kolop mud-pack therapy on pain, function and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. 30 patients were treated with Tiszasüly hot mud-pack (Group 1), 30 patients with Kolop hot mud-pack (Group 2) for 10 working days. Knee pain, function a nd qualitiy of life were measured at baseline, at the end of treatment and 3 months later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 4, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.5 years
January 30, 2019
January 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
change in severity of pain at rest
change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
Week 0 and Week 2
change in severity of pain at rest
change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
Week 0 and Week 12
change in function
change from baseline physical function measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 2. It is comprised of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). All the items are scored on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Values are summed up for a combined WOMAC score. The lower score represents better outcome.
Week 0 and Week 2
change in function
change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 12. It is comprised of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). All the items are scored on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Values are summed up for a combined WOMAC score. The lower score represents better outcome.
Week 0 and Week 12
change in function
change from baseline physical function measuredf by Lequesne Index, which is a 10-question survey. It has five questions pertaining to pain or discomfort, 1 question dealing with maximum distance walked, and four questions about activities of daily living.
Week 0 and Week 2
change in function
change from baseline physical function measured by Lequesne Index, which is a 10-question survey. It has five questions pertaining to pain or discomfort, 1 question dealing with maximum distance walked, and four questions about activities of daily living.
Week 0 and Week 12
change in function
change from baselilne physical function measured by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). It is an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index with the purpose of evaluating short-term and long-term symptoms and function in knee osteoarthritis. It has five separately scored subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related quality of life (QOL). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems.
Week 0 and Week 2
change in function
change from baselilne physical function measured by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). It is an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index with the purpose of evaluating short-term and long-term symptoms and function in knee osteoarthritis. It has five separately scored subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related quality of life (QOL). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems.
Week 0 and Week 12
change in quality of life
change from baseline qualiity of life measured by EuroQoL-5D. It has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), where patients are asked to rate their health problems at five levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems). It also includes a self-rating of health status on a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 (where 0 means the worst and 100 means the best health status).
Week 0 and Week 2
change in quality of life
change from baseline qualiity of life measured by EuroQoL-5D. It has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), where patients are asked to rate their health problems at five levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems). It also includes a self-rating of health status on a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 (where 0 means the worst and 100 means the best health status).
Week 0 and Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Tiszasüly mud-pack
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the Tiszasüly mud-pack group got hot mud-packs for 30 minutes on 10 occasions for 2 weeks (10 working days) on the painful knee.
Kolop mud-pack
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the Kolop mud-pack group got hot mud-packs for 30 minutes on 10 occasions for 2 weeks (10 working days) on the painful knee.
Interventions
Patients received Tiszasüly hot mud-packs (42 Celsius degree) for 30 minutes on 10 occasions for 2 weeks (10 working days) on the painful knee.
Patients received Kolop hot mud-packs (42 Celsius degree) for 30 minutes on 10 occasions for 2 weeks (10 working days) on the painful knee.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients over 18 years of age with knee osteoarthritis (radiologically Kellgren-Laurence II-III. stage)
- resting VAS pain is \> 50 mm
You may not qualify if:
- infection
- fever
- tumour
- neurologic disorders with numbness and tingling sensation in the lower extremeties
- skin disease aroud the knee
- untreated hypertension
- heart failure (NYHA II-IV. stage)
- inflammatory rheumatic diseases
- knee arthroplasty
- steroid or hialuronic acid injection into the knee joint within 3 months
- physiotherapy of the knee within 3 months
- inflammatory knee osteoarthitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital
Győr, 9025, Hungary
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- chief physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2019
First Posted
February 1, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01