GnRH Agonist Versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction With Intrauterine Insemination.
1 other identifier
interventional
197
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) in patients who are administered either Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. Total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n= 99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 31, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.2 years
January 11, 2019
January 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The effectiveness of GnRHa versus hCG in ovulation induction
To compare the ovulation rate of patients who were triggered with GnRHa versus hCG in patients undergoing either natural cycle or controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and IUI.
14 months
The effectiveness of GnRHa versus hCG in pregnancy rate
To compare the pregnancy rate of patients who were triggered with GnRHa versus hCG in patients undergoing either natural cycle or controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and IUI.
14 months
Study Arms (2)
GnRHa trigger
EXPERIMENTALInfertile patients underwent ovarian stimulation, started on cycle day eight with 75 IU Menogon (Ferring Pharm Co, Switzerland) daily. Ultrasound monitoring was required after every 2-3 days of stimulation and adjustments to dose and duration were tailed according the patient's response. Ovulation was triggered when at least one and no more than 3 follicles reached ≥18mm in diameter. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive two doses of GnRH-a (Fertipeptil 0.1mg x 2 vial; Ferring Pharm Co, Switzerland) for ovulation trigger.
hCG trigger
EXPERIMENTALInfertile patients underwent ovarian stimulation, started on cycle day eight with 75 IU Menogon (Ferring Pharm Co, Switzerland) daily. Ultrasound monitoring was required after every 2-3 days of stimulation and adjustments to dose and duration were tailed according the patient's response. Ovulation was triggered when at least one and no more than 3 follicles reached ≥18mm in diameter. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive hCG (Pregnyl 5000IU; Organon Pharm Co, Nertheland) for ovulation trigger.
Interventions
Two doses of GnRH-a (Fertipeptil 0.1mg x 2 vial) for ovulation trigger after ovarian stimulation for IUI.
hCG (Pregnyl 5000IU) for ovulation trigger after ovarian stimulation for IUI.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infertile women who were indicated for IUI cycles
- bilateral tubal patency
- at least one follicle ≥ 18mm in diameter on the day of trigger, and
- men with more than five millions total motile sperm after preparation.
- Only the first cycles of IUI were studied
You may not qualify if:
- No mature follicle
- Disagree to be enrolled
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Minh Tam Le, Prof.MD.PhD
Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Odd even rule
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2019
First Posted
January 31, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01