NCT03824808

Brief Summary

Controlling pain is fundamental during and after surgical procedures. This study examines pain associated with robotic assisted surgery on prostate cancer or a kidney mass. In recent years, the risk of opioids in the postoperative period has gained interest due to the growing epidemic of addiction, dependence, and overdose. In this study, the investigators expect a continuous infusion of intravenous lidocaine during the perioperative period to result in less pain and less opioid use.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 31, 2019

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 26, 2019

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 26, 2020

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 25, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 25, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 13, 2018

Results QC Date

July 10, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

prostatectomypartial nephrectomyrobotic surgeryintravenous lidocainelidocaine hydrochloride

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Post-operative Pain Scores Measured by Visual Analog Scale

    10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), score of 0 "no pain" to a score of 10 "worst pain ever"

    Through study completion, assessed at 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h and 24h post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Opioid Consumption

    Through study completion, assessed for first 24-hours post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    At participant discharge, assessed up to 14 days (+/-) 7 days

  • Duration of Post-operative Ileus

    Through study completion, assessed at 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h and 24h post operatively, then every 24 hours until discharge, and at the post operative visit which occurred within 21-days post-operatively.

  • Post-operative PACU Time

    During hospitalization, approximately 2 hours post-surgery

  • Return of Flatus

    During hospitalization at 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h, and 24h post operatively, then every 24 hours thereafter until discharge.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lidocaine Hydrochloride 0.8% in Dextrose 5% Solution

Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride 0.8% in Dextrose 5% Solution

Control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection

Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection

Interventions

Lidocaine Hydrochloride and 5% Dextrose Injection, USP is a sterile, nonpyrogenic solution prepared from lidocaine hydrochloride and dextrose in water for injection.

Also known as: Lidocaine
Treatment group

Sodium Chloride Injection USP is sterile, nonpyrogenic, isotonic and contains no bacteriostatic or antimicrobial agents.

Also known as: Normal Saline
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergoing robotic assisted prostatectomy or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy at University of Missouri Hospital for prostate cancer or kidney mass
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ASA I-III

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to obtain written informed consent
  • Allergy to lidocaine or other amide local anesthetics
  • Atrioventricular conduction blocks
  • CV instability and concomitant use of alpha agonists or beta blockers
  • Recent myocardial infarction (≤ 6 months ago)
  • Cardiac arrhythmia disorders
  • Stokes-Adams syndrome
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
  • Seizure disorders
  • Liver failure or hepatic dysfunction
  • Significant renal disease with a serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl
  • A family history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Current use of opioids or documented history of opioid abuse
  • Typically, have less than 3 bowel movement per week
  • Combined surgical cases that include robotic prostatectomy or robotic partial nephrectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital

Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Bates C, Laciak R, Southwick A, Bishoff J. Overprescription of postoperative narcotics: a look at postoperative pain medication delivery, consumption and disposal in urological practice. J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):551-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.088. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

    PMID: 21168869BACKGROUND
  • Hedegaard H, Warner M, Minino AM. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Dec;(294):1-8.

    PMID: 29319475BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers---United States, 1999--2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Nov 4;60(43):1487-92.

    PMID: 22048730BACKGROUND
  • Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28114177BACKGROUND
  • De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald P, Streicher LF, Marcus RJ, McCarthy RJ. Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):262-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318257a380. Epub 2012 May 14.

    PMID: 22584558BACKGROUND
  • Joshi GP, Jaschinski T, Bonnet F, Kehlet H; PROSPECT collaboration. Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence? BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Nov 4;15:159. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0137-2.

    PMID: 26530113BACKGROUND
  • Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events associated with postoperative opioid analgesia: a systematic review. J Pain. 2002 Jun;3(3):159-80. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.123652. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14622770BACKGROUND
  • Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Payne CJ, Cundy TP, Nandi D, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Trends in the diffusion of robotic surgery: A retrospective observational study. Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4):e1870. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1870. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

    PMID: 29105982BACKGROUND
  • Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):891-901. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

    PMID: 25572825BACKGROUND
  • Avulova S, Smith JA Jr. Is Comparison of Robotic to Open Radical Prostatectomy Still Relevant? Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):672-673. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29398264BACKGROUND
  • D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Sun L, Dahm P, Habib AS. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

    PMID: 19700296BACKGROUND
  • Batley SE, Prasad V, Vasdev N, Mohan-S G. Post-Operative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Robotic Urological Surgery. Curr Urol. 2016 Feb;9(1):5-11. doi: 10.1159/000442843. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

    PMID: 26989364BACKGROUND
  • Woldu SL, Weinberg AC, Bergman A, Shapiro EY, Korets R, Motamedinia P, Badani KK. Pain and analgesic use after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):544-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0783. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

    PMID: 24400824BACKGROUND
  • Jendoubi A, Naceur IB, Bouzouita A, Trifa M, Ghedira S, Chebil M, Houissa M. A comparison between intravenous lidocaine and ketamine on acute and chronic pain after open nephrectomy: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):177-184. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203027.

    PMID: 28442956BACKGROUND
  • Naik BI, Tsang S, Knisely A, Yerra S, Durieux ME. Retrospective case-control non-inferiority analysis of intravenous lidocaine in a colorectal surgery enhanced recovery program. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0306-6.

    PMID: 28143397BACKGROUND
  • Nakhli MS, Kahloul M, Guizani T, Zedini C, Chaouch A, Naija W. Intravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to general anesthesia in renal surgery. Libyan J Med. 2018 Dec;13(1):1433418. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2018.1433418.

    PMID: 29433385BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms

Interventions

LidocaineGlucoseSolutionsSodium ChlorideSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, MaleGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesProstatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesHexosesMonosaccharidesSugarsCarbohydratesPharmaceutical PreparationsChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic Solutions

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Boris Mraovic
Organization
University of Missouri

Study Officials

  • Boris Mraovic, MD

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The surgeon, anesthesiologist, operating room staff, participant, personnel in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as the investigators collecting the postoperative data will be blinded to the group allocation. Study medication is prepared and masked by an unblinded investigation drug pharmacist who is not involved in clinical care.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will receive either intraoperative 0.8% lidocaine or normal saline at 1 mg/kg/h when younger than 65 years and 0.5 mg/kg/h when greater than or equal to the age of 65 to be delivered by continuous infusion for 24 hours.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2018

First Posted

January 31, 2019

Study Start

February 26, 2019

Primary Completion

March 26, 2020

Study Completion

March 26, 2020

Last Updated

October 25, 2023

Results First Posted

October 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations