EPASS Versus Uncovered Duodenal Stent for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction.
EUS-guided Balloon-occluded Gastrojejunostomy Bypass (EPASS) Versus Uncovered Duodenal Stent for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction.
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgical gastrojejunostomy is the conventional treatment for palliating patients suffering from of inoperable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Although, the procedure is associated with a high success and low re-intervention rates, there is a risk of morbidities (10% - 16%) and mortalities (7%). The placement of a pyloro-duodenal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is an alternative to surgery for the palliating these patients. As compared to surgery, the procedure is associated with shorter hospital stay, reduced morbidities and cost. However, the clinical efficacy of SEMS is limited by several problems. In uncovered SEMS, the long-term patency is reduced by tumor ingrowth leading to subsequent re-stenosis. In covered SEMS, stent migration occurs at a frequency of 14-25% and it is a major obstacle to stent patency. As a result, randomized trials comparing uncovered stents and partially or fully covered stents in patients with malignant GOO have reported comparable stent patency between the two types of stents. Recently, the creation of a gastrojejunostomy under EUS (EUS-GJ) guidance using lumen-apposing stents has been described. The procedure was associated with a technical success rate of around 90% and clinical success of 85% to 100%. The procedure holds the potential to create a gastrojejunostomy without surgery. Furthermore, there is a low risk of tumor ingrowth and stent migration, thus improving the stent patency and reducing the need of re-intervention. We have previously published a novel method of creating EUS-GJ with the use of a double balloon occluder (EPASS). The device provides a stable condition for performance of EUS-GJ and improves the safety of the procedure. However, there is limited data on how EPASS compares to endoscopic stenting. The aim of the current study is thus to compare EPASS and DS under a randomized setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2022
CompletedAugust 31, 2023
August 1, 2023
2.3 years
January 24, 2019
August 30, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Re-intervention rate
The percentage of patients requiring additional endoscopic intervention due to stent dysfunction.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Technical success rate
1 day
Clinical success rate
3 days
Stent dysfunction rate
6 months
Duration of stent patency
6 months
Adverse events rate
6 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe procedures would be performed under conscious sedation or monitored anesthesia by a therapeutic gastroscope. The endoscope would be used to reach the site of obstruction. The stricture would be cannulated with a 0.025" or 0.035" guide-wire. The double balloon occluder would then be inserted on guidewire beyond the duodenal-jejunal flexure and the two balloons of the occluder would be inflated. A segment of duodenum/jejunum would then be occluded and saline would be injected. A linear echoendoscope would then be inserted into the stomach to guide insertion of the gastrojejunostomy stent.
Pyloro-duodenal stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe uncovered DS used in this study is Wallflex (Boston, Natick, MA, USA), made of nitinol wire, with a diameter of 22mm and length of 6, 9, 12cm. This stent is a braided stent with high axial force, good flexibility and conformability.
Interventions
As listed in the arms description
As listed in the arms description
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old
- Confirmed unresectable distal gastric or duodenal or pancreatico-biliary malignancies
- Suffering from gastric outlet obstruction with a gastric outlet obstruction score of ≤ 1
- Performance status ECOG ≤3
You may not qualify if:
- Prior metallic stent placement
- Severe comorbidities precluding the endoscopic procedure (such as cardiopulmonary disease, sepsis, or a bleeding disorder)
- Life expectancy of less than 1 month
- History of gastric surgery
- Linitus plastic
- Multiple-level bowel obstruction confirmed on radiographic studies such as small bowel series or abdominal computed tomography
- Coagulation disorders
- Pregnancy
- Unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (2)
Teoh AYB, Lakhtakia S, Tarantino I, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R, Maluf-Filho F, Dhir V, Basha J, Chan SM, Ligresti D, Ma MTW, de la Serna-Higuera C, Yip HC, Ng EKW, Chiu PWY, Itoi T. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus uncovered duodenal metal stenting for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DRA-GOO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;10(6):e8-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00136-0.
PMID: 40347959DERIVEDTeoh AYB, Lakhtakia S, Tarantino I, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R, Maluf-Filho F, Dhir V, Basha J, Chan SM, Ligresti D, Ma MTW, de la Serna-Higuera C, Yip HC, Ng EKW, Chiu PWY, Itoi T. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus uncovered duodenal metal stenting for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DRA-GOO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;9(2):124-132. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00242-X. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
PMID: 38061378DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Recruited patients would not be informed of the type of treatment that was received.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Honorary Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2019
First Posted
January 30, 2019
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 30, 2022
Study Completion
May 30, 2022
Last Updated
August 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08