Study Stopped
Follow-up of the VenaSeal vs. Endothermal Ablation and Venous Leg Ulcer studies was concluded early due to increased evidence of safety and effectiveness of VenaSeal in published literature and to reduce burden to investigators and sites.
VenaSeal Spectrum: Global Post-Market Randomized Controlled Trial
Global, Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the VenaSeal™ Closure System vs. Surgical Stripping or Endothermal Ablation (ETA) for the Treatment of Early & Advanced Stage Superficial Venous Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
506
10 countries
32
Brief Summary
Global, Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the VenaSeal™ Closure System vs. Surgical Stripping or Endothermal Ablation (ETA) for the Treatment of Early and Advanced Stage Superficial Venous Disease
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
32 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 12, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 10, 2025
CompletedDecember 30, 2025
December 1, 2025
4.4 years
January 8, 2019
June 3, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.
Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.
30 days
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.
Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.
30 days
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.
Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.
30 days
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.
Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.
30 days
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.
Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.
Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Primary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Healing, Calculated Through Healing Confirmation and Verified by an Independent Core Laboratory Through 12 Months.
Time to ulcer healing reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as a percentage of participants with ulcer healing through 12 months.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (53)
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
6 months
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
6 months
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
6 months
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.
30 days
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.
30 days
- +48 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ System
EXPERIMENTALCEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. ETA
Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
ACTIVE COMPARATORCEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. ETA
Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ System
EXPERIMENTALCEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. Surgical Stripping
Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
ACTIVE COMPARATORCEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. Surgical Stripping
Single arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
EXPERIMENTALCEAP 6 active leg ulcer subjects will not be randomized to a comparator, all subjects will be treated with VenaSeal™ System
Interventions
The VenaSeal™ System is the non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant device that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.
ETA includes EVLA that uses laser or RFA that uses radiofrequency heating to close the vein. Heat is applied in both EVLA and RFA therapies to close the vein. Subject can be treated with either EVLA or RFA if randomized to ETA arm per site's standard practice.
Surgical stripping involves stripping (removal) of the diseased vein via surgical procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is ≥18 years of age
- Patient has venous reflux in superficial truncal vein(s) (e.g., GSV, SSV, accessory saphenous veins) with CEAP 2 (symptomatic) or CEAP 3, 4a, 4b, 5, 6, appropriate for treatment, as confirmed by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS)
- Eligibility for treatment:
- VenaSeal vs ETA Study: Patient is eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system and ETA
- VenaSeal vs Surgical Stripping Study: Patient is eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system and surgical stripping
- VLU Study: patients should be eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system
- Treatable refluxing segment of target vein(s) 10 cm in length or longer
- Patient has a target vein diameter of ≥3 mm throughout the intended treated segment of the target vein as measured by DUS while patient is standing
- Patient is willing and capable of complying with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
- Patient has an ability to understand the requirements of the study and to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a known history of allergic sensitivities (including but not limited to cyanoacrylate adhesives), or any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator may make the patient more susceptible to cyanoacrylate adhesive hypersensitivity
- Patient has known deep vein obstruction in the target limb, as identified by the site's standard of care
- Patient has abnormal pulse exam or ABI \<0.8
- Patient has acute superficial thrombophlebitis
- Patient requires any non-target vein treatments in the contralateral or ipsilateral limb, or any other surgical procedure up tp 30 days pre-procedure and through 3 months post-procedure
- Patient has any co-morbid conditions, which in the investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's compliance with study visits and procedures, or may confound interpretation of study data (e.g., congestive heart failure Class III and IV, non-ambulatory patients, severe hepatic dysfunction, life expectancy \< 1 year)
- IFU contraindications:
- VenaSeal vs. ETA Study: Patient has VenaSeal™ system and/or ETA product's IFU contraindication(s)
- VenaSeal vs Surgical Stripping Study: Patient has surgical stripping and/or VenaSeal™ system IFU contraindication(s)
- VLU Study: Patient has VenaSeal™ system IFU contraindication(s)
- Patient is non-ambulatory
- Patient is a female of childbearing potential who may be pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of the index procedure
- Patient belongs to a vulnerable population per investigator's judgment or patient has any kind of disorder that compromises his/her ability to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study when the data collected could be conflicting or biased due to participation in another study
- Patient has documented COVID-19 infection currently or within the past 3 months. Patient is not completely recovered from past COVID-19 infection, per physician's discretion.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (32)
Yavapai Regional Medical Center
Prescott Valley, Arizona, 86314-2255, United States
PIMA Heart and Vascular
Tucson, Arizona, 85718, United States
Valley Vascular Surgical Associates
Fresno, California, 93701, United States
Vascular Care Connecticut
Darien, Connecticut, 06820, United States
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2113, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Vascular Care Group
Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02482, United States
New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10024, United States
OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214, United States
Orion Medical
Houston, Texas, 77034, United States
Lake Washington Vascular
Bellevue, Washington, 98004-4623, United States
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
Birtinya, 4575, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, Australia
East Toronto Vascular Clinic
Toronto, Ontario, M4L 3Y3, Canada
CHU Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, DIjon Cedex, 21079, France
Clinique du Parc
Lyon, 69006, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, France
Praxis fur Innere Medizin und Gefäβkrankheiten
Halle, 06108, Germany
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico
Milan, 20121, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova Ospendale Sant' Antonio
Padua, 35127, Italy
Rijnstate - Locatie Arnhem
Arnhem, 6815, Netherlands
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 137-701, South Korea
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, 143-729, South Korea
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Granada (Hospital Campus de la Salud)
Granada, 18016, Spain
Sanitas Hospital Universitario La Zarzuela
Madrid, 28023, Spain
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bedford, MK42 9DJ, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
West London Vascular and Interventional Centre
Harrow, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust - Charing Cross Hospital
London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Wendy Moeyersons, Clinical Research Specialist
- Organization
- Medtronic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen Gibson, MD
Lake Washington Vascular, US
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manjit Gohel, MD
Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
February 5, 2020
Primary Completion
June 12, 2024
Study Completion
November 10, 2025
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Results First Posted
September 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share