Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography-derived Minimal Lumen Area, Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve and FFRCT
OPTICO-LM
Multimodality Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Stenosis: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography-derived Minimal Lumen Area, Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve and FFRCT
1 other identifier
interventional
104
4 countries
13
Brief Summary
Significant left main (LM) stenosis is associated with a poor prognosis, therefore, adequate judgement of the prognostic significance of LM stenosis is essential to improve patients' prognosis. Recently, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become widespread practice and carries a Class Ia recommendation to assess functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with stable angina. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived minimum lumen area (MLA) represents an accurate measure to determine LM significance as shown in multiple studies, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) ,which is a novel intracoronary imaging method with a greater spatial resolution (15μm vs. 100μm), faster image acquisition and facilitated image interpretation, OCT derived-MLA has never been validated against FFR and accordingly, it is not mentioned in the current guidelines for myocardial revascularization. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative of coronary angiography with its excellent negative predictive value, while the positive predictive value of CTA is limited. Computational fluid dynamics is an emerging method that enables prediction of blood flow in coronary arteries and calculation of FFR from computed tomography (FFRCT) noninvasively. Noninvasive and accurate assessment of functional significance would bring a great benefit for patients with LM stenosis, however, there are no data to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT for LM stenosis in comparison with FFR and minimal lumen area derived by OCT. This study will investigate the optimal OCT-derived MLA cut-off point and the diagnostic performance of FFRCT for intermediate LM stenosis compared with FFR ≤0.8 as a reference standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 9, 2023
February 1, 2023
7.6 years
January 17, 2019
February 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
OCT vs. FFR
\- The area under the curve of OCT-derived MLA for FFR≤0.8
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR
-The optimal cut-off point of OCT-derived MLA from receiver-operator characteristics curves for FFR≤0.8
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
FFRCT vs. FFR
Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRCT≤0.8 for FFR≤0.8
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
Secondary Outcomes (14)
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT, QFR
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. CTA
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. CTA
Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patient with left-main stenosis
OTHERMultimodality assessment of intermediate left main stenosis: Comparison of optical coherence tomography-derived minimal lumen area, invasive fractional flow reserve and FFRCT
Interventions
Multimodality assessment of intermediate left main stenosis: Comparison of optical coherence tomography-derived minimal lumen area, invasive fractional flow reserve and FFRCT
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unprotected LM lesion \[midshaft, and distal bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1 or 1,1,0 or 1,0,1 or 1,0,0)\] of 30% to 80% angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) on visual estimation or equivocal disease by angiography.
- Age ≥18 years.
- Ability to give preliminary oral consent witnessed by an independent physician or sign written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant distal lesions (\>50% angiographic DS on visual estimation within the left anterior descending artery \[LAD\] or left circumflex artery \[LCX\], except for ostium of LAD or LCX or diseased side branch \[e.g. diagonal branch, obtuse marginal branch\])
- Ostial LM disease.
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (non-ST-elevation ACS and ST-elevation MI).
- LM In-stent restenosis.
- Previous coronary stenting of the left coronary system.
- Chronic total occlusion.
- Previous coronary artery bypass graft.
- Previous MI related to the left coronary artery.
- Occurrence of ventricularization or hypotension during engagement of the LM ostial lesion.
- The presence of hemodynamic instability.
- Known renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \>1.5mg/dL or receiving dialysis).
- Female of childbearing potential (age \<50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy.
- Life expectancy less than 1 year.
- Contraindication or known allergy against protocol-required medications including heparin, iodinated contrast, β-blocker, nitroglycerin, and adenosine.
- Body mass index \>35kg/m2.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
Institute Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75014, France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, 75014, France
Universitätsklinikum Giessen Justus-Liebig Universität
Giessen, Hesse, 35392, Germany
Friedrich Alexander Universität (FAU) , Medizinische Klinik 2 , Kardiologie und Angiologie
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Ageo Central General Hospital
Ageo, 362-8588, Japan
Gifu heart center
Gifu, 500-8384, Japan
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Shinshu University School of Medicine
Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
Kansai Medical University,
Osaka, 573-1010, Japan
Medical Corporation Ouyuukai Tokorozawa Heart Center
Saitama, 359-1142, Japan
Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital
Sapporo, 065-0033, Japan
Inselspital
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
CHUV
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sorensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Frobert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
PMID: 27810312BACKGROUNDNeumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
PMID: 30165437BACKGROUNDJasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004 Nov 2;110(18):2831-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146338.62813.E7. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
PMID: 15492302BACKGROUNDde la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064.
PMID: 21757111BACKGROUNDNorgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, Osawa K, Marwan M, Naber C, Erglis A, Park SJ, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S; NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1145-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PMID: 24486266BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorenz Raeber, Prof. MD PhD
Inselspital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
May 28, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share