NCT03820492

Brief Summary

Significant left main (LM) stenosis is associated with a poor prognosis, therefore, adequate judgement of the prognostic significance of LM stenosis is essential to improve patients' prognosis. Recently, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become widespread practice and carries a Class Ia recommendation to assess functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with stable angina. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived minimum lumen area (MLA) represents an accurate measure to determine LM significance as shown in multiple studies, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) ,which is a novel intracoronary imaging method with a greater spatial resolution (15μm vs. 100μm), faster image acquisition and facilitated image interpretation, OCT derived-MLA has never been validated against FFR and accordingly, it is not mentioned in the current guidelines for myocardial revascularization. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative of coronary angiography with its excellent negative predictive value, while the positive predictive value of CTA is limited. Computational fluid dynamics is an emerging method that enables prediction of blood flow in coronary arteries and calculation of FFR from computed tomography (FFRCT) noninvasively. Noninvasive and accurate assessment of functional significance would bring a great benefit for patients with LM stenosis, however, there are no data to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT for LM stenosis in comparison with FFR and minimal lumen area derived by OCT. This study will investigate the optimal OCT-derived MLA cut-off point and the diagnostic performance of FFRCT for intermediate LM stenosis compared with FFR ≤0.8 as a reference standard.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
104

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started May 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
4 countries

13 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
May 2019Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2019

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 28, 2019

Completed
7.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

February 9, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7.6 years

First QC Date

January 17, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Coronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveOptical coherence tomographyComputed tomography angiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • OCT vs. FFR

    \- The area under the curve of OCT-derived MLA for FFR≤0.8

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • OCT vs. FFR

    -The optimal cut-off point of OCT-derived MLA from receiver-operator characteristics curves for FFR≤0.8

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • FFRCT vs. FFR

    Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRCT≤0.8 for FFR≤0.8

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT, QFR

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • OCT vs. CTA

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • OCT vs. CTA

    Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Patient with left-main stenosis

OTHER

Multimodality assessment of intermediate left main stenosis: Comparison of optical coherence tomography-derived minimal lumen area, invasive fractional flow reserve and FFRCT

Diagnostic Test: OCT, FFR, CTA and FFRCT

Interventions

Multimodality assessment of intermediate left main stenosis: Comparison of optical coherence tomography-derived minimal lumen area, invasive fractional flow reserve and FFRCT

Patient with left-main stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Unprotected LM lesion \[midshaft, and distal bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1 or 1,1,0 or 1,0,1 or 1,0,0)\] of 30% to 80% angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) on visual estimation or equivocal disease by angiography.
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Ability to give preliminary oral consent witnessed by an independent physician or sign written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant distal lesions (\>50% angiographic DS on visual estimation within the left anterior descending artery \[LAD\] or left circumflex artery \[LCX\], except for ostium of LAD or LCX or diseased side branch \[e.g. diagonal branch, obtuse marginal branch\])
  • Ostial LM disease.
  • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (non-ST-elevation ACS and ST-elevation MI).
  • LM In-stent restenosis.
  • Previous coronary stenting of the left coronary system.
  • Chronic total occlusion.
  • Previous coronary artery bypass graft.
  • Previous MI related to the left coronary artery.
  • Occurrence of ventricularization or hypotension during engagement of the LM ostial lesion.
  • The presence of hemodynamic instability.
  • Known renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \>1.5mg/dL or receiving dialysis).
  • Female of childbearing potential (age \<50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy.
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year.
  • Contraindication or known allergy against protocol-required medications including heparin, iodinated contrast, β-blocker, nitroglycerin, and adenosine.
  • Body mass index \>35kg/m2.
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

RECRUITING

Institute Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, 75014, France

RECRUITING

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, 75014, France

RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Giessen Justus-Liebig Universität

Giessen, Hesse, 35392, Germany

RECRUITING

Friedrich Alexander Universität (FAU) , Medizinische Klinik 2 , Kardiologie und Angiologie

Erlangen, 91054, Germany

RECRUITING

Ageo Central General Hospital

Ageo, 362-8588, Japan

RECRUITING

Gifu heart center

Gifu, 500-8384, Japan

RECRUITING

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Shinshu University School of Medicine

Nagano, 390-8621, Japan

RECRUITING

Kansai Medical University,

Osaka, 573-1010, Japan

RECRUITING

Medical Corporation Ouyuukai Tokorozawa Heart Center

Saitama, 359-1142, Japan

RECRUITING

Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital

Sapporo, 065-0033, Japan

RECRUITING

Inselspital

Bern, 3010, Switzerland

RECRUITING

CHUV

Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sorensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Frobert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

    PMID: 27810312BACKGROUND
  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30165437BACKGROUND
  • Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004 Nov 2;110(18):2831-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146338.62813.E7. Epub 2004 Oct 18.

    PMID: 15492302BACKGROUND
  • de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064.

    PMID: 21757111BACKGROUND
  • Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, Osawa K, Marwan M, Naber C, Erglis A, Park SJ, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S; NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1145-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

    PMID: 24486266BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary StenosisCoronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Tomography, Optical CoherenceComputed Tomography Angiography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography, OpticalOptical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisTomographyInvestigative TechniquesTomography, X-Ray ComputedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMultimodal ImagingRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-Ray

Study Officials

  • Lorenz Raeber, Prof. MD PhD

    Inselspital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Lorenz Raeber, Prof. MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2019

First Posted

January 29, 2019

Study Start

May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

February 9, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations