NCT03816969

Brief Summary

In this study investigators shall compare between the two types of air-Q 's; the Air-Q ILA blocker and the Air-Q SP with blocker , regarding good sealing and oropharyngeal leak pressure

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 5, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 18, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Self-pressurized Air Q

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Oropharyngeal leak pressure

    The Oropharyngeal leak pressure after insertion and fixation of the device

    10 Minutes after initial assessment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Insertion time

    10 Minutes

  • Complications associated

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Self-pressurized air-Q with blocker

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Self-pressurized air-Q with blocker has a greater seal pressure compared to Air-Q blocker, easier and faster in insertion and has less morbidity and complications while and after insertion

Device: Self-pressurized air-Q with blocker

Air-Q ILA blocker

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

It has a drain tube through which a suction tube is passed

Device: Air-Q ILA blocker

Interventions

It has a drain tube through which a suction tube is passed like the Air-QILA blocker, and Instead of the pilot balloon and inflating cuff, the air-Q SP with blocker incorporates a self-regulating periglottic cuff at the end of this tube , a communication orifice at the junction of the peri-glottic cuff and the airway tube. This communication between two spaces enables the cuff to dynamically regulate intra-cuff pressure depending on airway pressure. This distinguishing feature of the air-Q SP may result in reduced risk for airway morbidities related to cuff hyperinflation

Self-pressurized air-Q with blocker

A good seal will provide good ventilation, will guarantee the desired depth of anesthesia at lower gas flows and with lesser leaks to the esophagus, it will not cause rise in intragastric pressure thus preventing regurgitation However, When the cuff pressure is more than the mucosal perfusion pressure, it is likely to either cause postoperative pharyngo-laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia) or cause local mucosal trauma and nerve injuries

Air-Q ILA blocker

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients between the age group of 18 and 50 years.
  • Patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II.
  • Patients with Ganzouri airway score less than 4.

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA III - V patients.
  • Airway score ≥ 4 according to El-Ganzouri Airway Scoring System.
  • Patients with any oropharyngeal pathology.
  • Patients known to have risk of gastric aspiration, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hiatus hernia or previous upper gastrointestinal tract surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed

Cairo, 11451, Egypt

Location

Study Officials

  • Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed, M.D

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
An online randomization program (http://www.randomizer.org) will be used to generate random list and to allocate patients into the study groups. Random allocation numbers will be concealed in opaque closed envelops. The patient and investigator assessing study outcomes will all be blinded to the study groups allocation.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: It has a drain tube through which a suction tube is passed like the Air-QILA blocker, and Instead of the pilot balloon and inflating cuff, the air-Q SP with blocker incorporates a self-regulating periglottic cuff at the end of this tube, a communication orifice at the junction of the peri-glottic cuff and the airway tube. This communication between two spaces enables the cuff to dynamically regulate intra-cuff pressure depending on airway pressure. This distinguishing feature of the air-Q SP may result in reduced risk for airway morbidities related to cuff hyperinflation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Anesthesia &I.C.U and Pain Clinic, Cairo University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2019

First Posted

January 25, 2019

Study Start

January 5, 2018

Primary Completion

January 10, 2019

Study Completion

January 18, 2019

Last Updated

July 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Locations