Study Stopped
Study terminated by the PIs due to unexpected outcomes
Carry-over Effects of Repetitively Applied Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Spasticity
SCS-CorE
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, causing substantial impairment of vital body functions caudal to the lesion. A major cause of disability stems from spasticity, a common secondary sequelae. Its various clinical manifestations include spasms, clonus, and resistance to passive movements, and often present a major hindrance in rehabilitation, further deteriorate residual motor performance, and negatively impact independence and quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, successful management of spasticity has remained difficult. Standard-of-care treatment modalities are often insufficient or bear the risk of undesirable side effects further accentuating paresis. Epidural stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord via implanted electrodes provides for an alternative approach. It works through modifying the dysregulated neural signal processing of spared spinal circuitry caudal to the injury. Its ameliorative effects on severe lower-limb spasticity have been repetitively reported. Yet, epidural spinal cord stimulation in motor disorders is still off-label, applied in relatively few patients only, also because of its invasive character, the time consuming testing phase for its effective application, and the lack of markers to identify responders in advance. With the development of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, a method became available to activate the same input structures to the lumbar spinal cord as with epidural stimulation and hence to induce similar neuromodulatory effects, yet non-invasively, using standard equipment available at rehabilitation centers. A recent proof-of-concept study has shown that a single 30-minute session of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation controlled various clinical signs of spasticity and augmented residual motor control in spinal cord injured individuals for several hours beyond its application. Further, in one subject, the stimulation was repetitively applied for six weeks, resulting in cumulative therapeutic effects persisting for 10 days after its discontinuation. These observations strongly suggest that the stimulation can induce beneficial neuroplastic adaptations of spared spinal systems and their interaction with residual supraspinal control. The proposed research aims at studying the reproducibility of these findings in a statistically sound cohort of individuals with spinal cord injury and testing the applicability and acceptance of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation as a home-based therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 10, 2021
CompletedNovember 26, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.3 years
January 22, 2019
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in spasticity index
Spasticity index based on the Wartenberg pendulum test: For the pendulum test, subjects will be in a supported sitting position with the trunk reclined approximately 30°. The examiner will lift one leg to a horizontal position, release it, and let it oscillate passively until it stops. The pendulum test will be repeated three times on each side, separated by phases of relaxation. The spasticity index is calculated subtracting the knee angle of the initial horizontal leg position from the peak flexion angle of the first swing divided by the final knee resting angle. Scores ≥ 1 denote non-spastic conditions, and 0 extreme spasticity.
from day 1 to day 57
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in numeric rating scale spasticity
day 1, 8, 29, 50 and 57
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale
from day 1 to day 57
Change in adductor tone rating
from day 1 to day 57
Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale
from day 1 to day 57
Change in resistance of the lower limbs
from day 1 to day 57
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
daily stimulation
EXPERIMENTAL30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 7 times per week.
stimulation every other day
EXPERIMENTAL30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 3 times per week.
Interventions
device for repetitive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- motor and sensory incomplete spinal cord injury classified as grade C or D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale
- neurological level of spinal cord injury: third cervical to tenth thoracic segment
- chronic condition (≥ 12 months post-spinal cord injury)
- preserved segmental and cutaneo-muscular reflexes in the lower limbs
- able to be verticalized for 6 minutes (with walking aids)
- preserved joint mobility, no musculoskeletal diseases
- spasticity (with/without antispasticity medication)
- stable antispasmodic medication one month prior to as well as during study participation
You may not qualify if:
- neuromuscular diseases, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, muscular dystrophy
- dermatological issues at the stimulation site
- acute urinary tract infection at study entry
- active implants (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, drug pump)
- passive implants between the ninth thoracic level and the first lumbal level (e.g. metal screws/plates for surgical stabilization of spinal fractures)
- malignant diseases
- heart insufficiency
- potential pregnancy (pregnancy test to be conducted as part of the first evaluation)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwillead
- Medical University of Viennacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Swiss Paraplegic Centre
Nottwil, Canton of Lucerne, 6207, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ursula Hofstötter
Medical University Vienna
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angela Frotzler
Swiss Paraplegic Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD in Medical Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2019
First Posted
January 24, 2019
Study Start
January 7, 2019
Primary Completion
May 10, 2021
Study Completion
May 10, 2021
Last Updated
November 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share