NCT03815721

Brief Summary

Spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, causing substantial impairment of vital body functions caudal to the lesion. A major cause of disability stems from spasticity, a common secondary sequelae. Its various clinical manifestations include spasms, clonus, and resistance to passive movements, and often present a major hindrance in rehabilitation, further deteriorate residual motor performance, and negatively impact independence and quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, successful management of spasticity has remained difficult. Standard-of-care treatment modalities are often insufficient or bear the risk of undesirable side effects further accentuating paresis. Epidural stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord via implanted electrodes provides for an alternative approach. It works through modifying the dysregulated neural signal processing of spared spinal circuitry caudal to the injury. Its ameliorative effects on severe lower-limb spasticity have been repetitively reported. Yet, epidural spinal cord stimulation in motor disorders is still off-label, applied in relatively few patients only, also because of its invasive character, the time consuming testing phase for its effective application, and the lack of markers to identify responders in advance. With the development of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, a method became available to activate the same input structures to the lumbar spinal cord as with epidural stimulation and hence to induce similar neuromodulatory effects, yet non-invasively, using standard equipment available at rehabilitation centers. A recent proof-of-concept study has shown that a single 30-minute session of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation controlled various clinical signs of spasticity and augmented residual motor control in spinal cord injured individuals for several hours beyond its application. Further, in one subject, the stimulation was repetitively applied for six weeks, resulting in cumulative therapeutic effects persisting for 10 days after its discontinuation. These observations strongly suggest that the stimulation can induce beneficial neuroplastic adaptations of spared spinal systems and their interaction with residual supraspinal control. The proposed research aims at studying the reproducibility of these findings in a statistically sound cohort of individuals with spinal cord injury and testing the applicability and acceptance of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation as a home-based therapy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 7, 2019

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2019

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 10, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

January 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in spasticity index

    Spasticity index based on the Wartenberg pendulum test: For the pendulum test, subjects will be in a supported sitting position with the trunk reclined approximately 30°. The examiner will lift one leg to a horizontal position, release it, and let it oscillate passively until it stops. The pendulum test will be repeated three times on each side, separated by phases of relaxation. The spasticity index is calculated subtracting the knee angle of the initial horizontal leg position from the peak flexion angle of the first swing divided by the final knee resting angle. Scores ≥ 1 denote non-spastic conditions, and 0 extreme spasticity.

    from day 1 to day 57

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in numeric rating scale spasticity

    day 1, 8, 29, 50 and 57

  • Change in Modified Ashworth Scale

    from day 1 to day 57

  • Change in adductor tone rating

    from day 1 to day 57

  • Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale

    from day 1 to day 57

  • Change in resistance of the lower limbs

    from day 1 to day 57

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

daily stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 7 times per week.

Device: Stimulette r2x+

stimulation every other day

EXPERIMENTAL

30-minute sessions of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the Stimulette r2x+ will be repetitively applied 3 times per week.

Device: Stimulette r2x+

Interventions

device for repetitive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

daily stimulationstimulation every other day

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • motor and sensory incomplete spinal cord injury classified as grade C or D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale
  • neurological level of spinal cord injury: third cervical to tenth thoracic segment
  • chronic condition (≥ 12 months post-spinal cord injury)
  • preserved segmental and cutaneo-muscular reflexes in the lower limbs
  • able to be verticalized for 6 minutes (with walking aids)
  • preserved joint mobility, no musculoskeletal diseases
  • spasticity (with/without antispasticity medication)
  • stable antispasmodic medication one month prior to as well as during study participation

You may not qualify if:

  • neuromuscular diseases, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, muscular dystrophy
  • dermatological issues at the stimulation site
  • acute urinary tract infection at study entry
  • active implants (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, drug pump)
  • passive implants between the ninth thoracic level and the first lumbal level (e.g. metal screws/plates for surgical stabilization of spinal fractures)
  • malignant diseases
  • heart insufficiency
  • potential pregnancy (pregnancy test to be conducted as part of the first evaluation)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Swiss Paraplegic Centre

Nottwil, Canton of Lucerne, 6207, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesMuscle Spasticity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ursula Hofstötter

    Medical University Vienna

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Angela Frotzler

    Swiss Paraplegic Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD in Medical Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2019

First Posted

January 24, 2019

Study Start

January 7, 2019

Primary Completion

May 10, 2021

Study Completion

May 10, 2021

Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations