Dislocation Precautions
Impact of Dislocation Precautions on Fear and Function in Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is looking at the impact of giving patients precautions, or restrictions for movement, when undergoing a total hip replacement. Have of the participants will receive precautions, while the other half will not receive any precautions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2023
CompletedAugust 8, 2022
August 1, 2022
4 years
January 14, 2019
August 5, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Oxford Hip Score
Assess function of the hip
Week before surgery to 6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Week before surgery to 6 months after surgery
Change in Forgotten Joint Score
6 weeks after surgery to 6 months after surgery
Change in EQ-5D-5L
Week before surgery to 6 months after surgery
Canadian Patient Experience Survey - Inpatient Care (CPES-IC)
At 2 weeks after surgery
Study Arms (4)
Anterior Approach Precautions
OTHERThis group receives precautions and have a total hip arthroplasty with a posterior approach.
Posterior Approach Precautions
OTHERThis group receives precautions and have a total hip arthroplasty with a posterior approach.
Anterior Approach No Precautions
OTHERThis group receives does not precautions and have a total hip arthroplasty with an anterior approach.
Posterior Approach No Precautions
OTHERThis group receives does not receive precautions and have a total hip arthroplasty with a posterior approach.
Interventions
These patients will be advised not to bend their leg or trunk more than 90 degrees, avoid crossing the leg or crossing midline, and rotating the leg inwards. Patients will also be instructed to put a pillow in between their legs while sleeping for 6 weeks and to avoid bathing for 6 weeks.
These patients will be advised to avoid extending the leg back, rotating the leg outwards, and lifting their bottom when lying down after their surgery for 6 weeks.
For the non-precautions group, there will be no mention of precautions by any providers before, during, and after surgery. No equipment will be given, but a list of self-care equipment will be available for 'comfort' purposes. Patients will be instructed to avoid bathing for 4 weeks. All groups will have instructions to use a walking aid and a toilet seat if needed, to weight-bear as tolerated, and to avoid driving for 3 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receiving a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis
- Over 18
- Willing and able to sign consent
You may not qualify if:
- Receiving a lateral approach hip arthroplasty
- Cannot make follow up visits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Related Publications (21)
Seagrave KG, Troelsen A, Malchau H, Husted H, Gromov K. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
PMID: 27879150BACKGROUNDSmith TO, Jepson P, Beswick A, Sands G, Drummond A, Davis ET, Sackley CM. Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 4;7(7):CD010815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010815.pub2.
PMID: 27374001BACKGROUNDvan der Weegen W, Kornuijt A, Das D. Do lifestyle restrictions and precautions prevent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Apr;30(4):329-39. doi: 10.1177/0269215515579421. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PMID: 25834275BACKGROUNDBarnsley L, Barnsley L, Page R. Are Hip Precautions Necessary Post Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Sep;6(3):230-5. doi: 10.1177/2151458515584640.
PMID: 26328242BACKGROUNDWestby MD, Brittain A, Backman CL. Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Canada and United States Delphi study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):411-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.22164.
PMID: 24023047BACKGROUNDVissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;41(4):576-88. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
PMID: 22035624BACKGROUNDSwinkels-Meewisse EJ, Swinkels RA, Verbeek AL, Vlaeyen JW, Oostendorp RA. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Man Ther. 2003 Feb;8(1):29-36. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0484.
PMID: 12586559BACKGROUNDPincus T, Vogel S, Burton AK, Santos R, Field AP. Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: a systematic review and synthesis of current evidence. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3999-4010. doi: 10.1002/art.22273.
PMID: 17133530BACKGROUNDDarlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S, Hurley DA, Baxter GD, Dowell A. The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2012 Jan;16(1):3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.006.
PMID: 21719329BACKGROUNDMacedo LG, Smeets RJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, McAuley JH. Graded activity and graded exposure for persistent nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010 Jun;90(6):860-79. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090303. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
PMID: 20395306BACKGROUNDWebster F, Perruccio AV, Jenkinson R, Jaglal S, Schemitsch E, Waddell JP, Venkataramanan V, Bytautas J, Davis AM. Understanding why people do or do not engage in activities following total joint replacement: a longitudinal qualitative study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jun;23(6):860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
PMID: 25707933BACKGROUNDDawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90.
PMID: 8666621BACKGROUNDBeard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray DW, Carr AJ, Price AJ. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
PMID: 25441700BACKGROUNDKaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Nov;82(11):131-8, 150.
PMID: 15559451BACKGROUNDPodsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PMID: 1991946BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUNDKurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PMID: 17403800BACKGROUNDHusted H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical and organizational aspects. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2012 Oct;83(346):1-39. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.700593.
PMID: 23205862BACKGROUNDZhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Sep;15(9):981-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
PMID: 17719803BACKGROUNDWithers TM, Lister S, Sackley C, Clark A, Smith TO. Is there a difference in physical activity levels in patients before and up to one year after unilateral total hip replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017 May;31(5):639-650. doi: 10.1177/0269215516673884. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
PMID: 27773874BACKGROUNDJones CA, Martin RS, Westby MD, Beaupre LA. Total joint arthroplasty: practice variation of physiotherapy across the continuum of care in Alberta. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 4;16(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1873-9.
PMID: 27809849BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2019
First Posted
January 16, 2019
Study Start
June 21, 2019
Primary Completion
June 21, 2023
Study Completion
December 21, 2023
Last Updated
August 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08