Lumbar Plexus vs Quadratus Lumborum Block in Post-operative Pain Following Total Hip Replacement
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-comparator, Non-inferiority Study to Observe Relative Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Class Lumbar Plexus Block in Managing Post-operative Pain Following Total Hip Replacement Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Lumbar Plexus (LP) block is currently used as the standard-of-care regional anesthesia technique to provide postoperative pain management after primary hip replacement surgery at UPMC Shadyside Hospital. However, the LP technique is complex and can be associated with potentially serious side effects, including nerve injury, major bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, and intrathecal injection of local anesthetic. In rare instances the LP block can also lead to motor blockade, interfering with early ambulation. There are several case reports of Quadratus Lumborum inter-fascial block (QL3) giving equally adequate pain relief after total hip replacement surgery, and this QL3 block is performed routinely at this institution. The benefits to inter-fascial administration of local anesthetic include the avoidance of theoretical nerve injury, bleeding and intrathecal anesthetic administration associated with the direct interaction between the nerve and the nerve block needle. The purpose of this study is to show that QL3 block is non-inferior to the standard-of-care lumbar plexus block and should be used more regularly in hip replacement surgery. The study will be conducted as a prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blind, non-inferiority, active-comparator trial. The investigators plan to enroll 40 subjects, 20 in each treatment group. This study will prospectively investigate the efficacy of QL3 versus Classic LP block for post-operative pain management in subjects undergoing primary, unilateral hip replacement surgery and prospectively compare QL3 versus Classic LP block in time to mobilization and physical therapy response. Primary outcome measures include pain at rest and with movement at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be time for first request for pain medication, total pain medications (narcotics and non-narcotic analgesics) given in 24 hours and the time of participant's ability to walk 100 feet as recorded by a physical therapist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 15, 2021
CompletedJuly 15, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.2 years
January 9, 2019
May 30, 2021
June 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain at Rest After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain at rest. A higher score means worse outcomes.
6 hours after surgery
Pain With Movement After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain with movement. A higher score means worse outcomes.
6 hours after surgery
Pain at Rest After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain at rest. A higher score means worse outcomes.
12 hours after surgery
Pain With Movement After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain with movement. A higher score means worse outcomes.
12 hours after surgery
Pain at Rest After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain at rest. A higher score means worse outcomes.
24 hours after surgery
Pain With Movement After Surgery
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score (0-10, 0 means no pain, 10 means the worst pain) of pain with movement. A higher score means worse outcomes.
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Pain During Physical Therapy
24 hours after surgery
Total Opioid Consumption During 24 Hours After Surgery
24 hours after surgery
Postoperative Time to Accomplish Walking 100 Feet
within 24 hours after surgery
Block Procedure Duration
during surgery
Patients With Postoperative Quadriceps Weakness
12 hours after surgery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lumbar Plexus block
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.5% ropivacaine 100 mg (20 ml) will be injected
Quadratus Lumborum type 3 block
EXPERIMENTAL0.5% ropivacaine 100 mg (20 ml) will be injected
Interventions
Patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus position with side to be blocked facing upwards. Midline will be identified by palpating the spinous process. Intercristal line will be drawn connecting iliac crests. The point of needle insertion will be 4 cm lateral to the intersection of both lines. The transverse process will first contact with a finder needle. Subsequently an 18 gauge 10 cm insulated needle will be used and advanced until it contacted the transverse process. Needle will then be redirected cephalad or caudad and advanced 2 cm, until the quadriceps femoris twitch is obtained. Local anesthetic will then be injected after confirming a motor response between 0.3-0.5 milli amperes.
Patient will be placed in a lateral position with the side to be blocked facing up. A low frequency transducer will be used to identify three layers of abdominal musculature, probe will be then moved posteriorly till the transverse abdominus aponeurosis is visualized, the QL muscle is then identified by tracing the aponeurosis posteriorly. The transducer is then moved more posteriorly to visualize the shadow of transverse process and the origin of QL muscle. Psoas muscle is then identified lying anterior to the QL muscle. A 22 gauge 8 cm is inserted in plane posterior to the probe and advanced intramuscularly through the QL to interfacial plane between QL and psoas major and local anesthetic is deposited.
0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml (100 mg) will be injected for both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18-90 years old
- Primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty
- BMI 20 - 36
- Male and Female
- All races
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- ASA class \> or = 4
- Pregnancy
- Any condition precluding patient going home with in 24 hours of surgery
- Non-English speaking or inability to participate in the study
- Patients with coagulopathy or on therapeutic anticoagulation
- Chronic Steroid Use
- Narcotic Addiction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sharad Khetarpallead
Study Sites (1)
UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Related Publications (9)
Ilfeld BM, Ball ST, Gearen PF, Le LT, Mariano ER, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Meyer RS. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks after hip arthroplasty: a dual-center, randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep;109(3):491-501. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318182a4a3.
PMID: 18719448BACKGROUNDWeller RS, Gerancher JC, Crews JC, Wade KL. Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma without neurologic deficit in two patients who underwent lumbar plexus block and were later anticoagulated. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):581-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00044. No abstract available.
PMID: 12552223BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
PMID: 20889937BACKGROUNDHockett MM, Hembrador S, Lee A. Continuous Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2016 Sep 15;7(6):129-31. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000363.
PMID: 27513972BACKGROUNDLa Colla L, Ben-David B, Merman R. Quadratus Lumborum Block as an Alternative to Lumbar Plexus Block for Hip Surgery: A Report of 2 Cases. A A Case Rep. 2017 Jan 1;8(1):4-6. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000406.
PMID: 28036319BACKGROUNDAdhikary SD, Short AJ, El-Boghdadly K, Abdelmalak MJ, Chin KJ. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum versus lumbar plexus block for total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Sep;34(3):372-378. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_335_17.
PMID: 30386022BACKGROUNDBørglum J, Moriggl B, Jensen K, Lønnqvist P, Christensen AF, Sauter A, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum blockade. British Journal of Anaesthesia 111:eLetters Supplement, 2013.
BACKGROUNDWinnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z, Radonjic R: Plexus blocks for lower extremity surgery: New answers to old problems. Anesth Review 1974; 1:11
BACKGROUNDPolania Gutierrez JJ, Ben-David B, Rest C, Grajales MT, Khetarpal SK. Quadratus lumborum block type 3 versus lumbar plexus block in hip replacement surgery: a randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;46(2):111-117. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101915. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PMID: 33177220DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was conducted at a single-center, potentially confounding external validity. Though the desired statistical power was achieved, our sample was still small. More non-inferiority studies are needed to confirm our results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sharad Khetarpal, MD
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharad Khetarpal, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The person who perform the block will be unblinded. The participants and the outcomes assessor will be blinded to the treatment allocations.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2019
First Posted
January 11, 2019
Study Start
March 19, 2019
Primary Completion
May 30, 2020
Study Completion
May 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 15, 2021
Results First Posted
July 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share